Talk:Weekly Fanstuff 2010

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(comment)
Line 6: Line 6:
::I don't really like the idea of merging them; the new title looks pretty unwieldy and doesn't agree with the template, which shows two separate years. On the other hand, I have this question: Why do we need these articles at all? I know they're linked from the template, but why do they need to be if there's no content? My preferred solution would be to just delete these really not-very useful articles. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
::I don't really like the idea of merging them; the new title looks pretty unwieldy and doesn't agree with the template, which shows two separate years. On the other hand, I have this question: Why do we need these articles at all? I know they're linked from the template, but why do they need to be if there's no content? My preferred solution would be to just delete these really not-very useful articles. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
:::I agree with deleting them, too. But just one problem: how are we then supposed to note that there was no fanstuff or sketches in 2010 or 2011? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 05:45, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
:::I agree with deleting them, too. But just one problem: how are we then supposed to note that there was no fanstuff or sketches in 2010 or 2011? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 05:45, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 +
:I would think we could add a note to the main articles for sketchbook and fanstuff saying "There have been no additions since 2009" and that ought to suffice. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:38, 3 May 2012

Since it was reverted, I might as well discuss this:

Is there a particular reason we have separate articles for the 2010 and 2011 Weekly Fanstuff (and Sketchbook)? They were both years with no new fanstuff or sketches, and their articles have almost the same content (or lack thereof), and I don't see the point in having two almost identical articles (and especially not two pairs of them, either). RickTommy (edits) 08:35, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Anyone? Unless anyone objects, I'll change it back to one article. RickTommy (edits) 03:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't really like the idea of merging them; the new title looks pretty unwieldy and doesn't agree with the template, which shows two separate years. On the other hand, I have this question: Why do we need these articles at all? I know they're linked from the template, but why do they need to be if there's no content? My preferred solution would be to just delete these really not-very useful articles. Heimstern Läufer 03:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
I agree with deleting them, too. But just one problem: how are we then supposed to note that there was no fanstuff or sketches in 2010 or 2011? RickTommy (edits) 05:45, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
I would think we could add a note to the main articles for sketchbook and fanstuff saying "There have been no additions since 2009" and that ought to suffice. Heimstern Läufer 08:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools