Talk:The Dapper Swindler
From Homestar Runner Wiki
The Goblin (Talk | contribs) (→What The CRAP?!: reply) |
(→What The CRAP?!) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Why do we still have this article? It's SOOOOOO pointless. can somebody PLEASE give a REASON to stand up for this article if they want to keep it? {{unsigned|Haldo|19:50}} | Why do we still have this article? It's SOOOOOO pointless. can somebody PLEASE give a REASON to stand up for this article if they want to keep it? {{unsigned|Haldo|19:50}} | ||
:Put {{tl|tbd}} on the top of the page and we'll discuss it. {{User:Techgeekmbg/sig}} 00:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | :Put {{tl|tbd}} on the top of the page and we'll discuss it. {{User:Techgeekmbg/sig}} 00:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | oh. that sucked. I'm having troble putting up the template.... [[user:haldo]] |
Revision as of 13:41, 3 November 2007
I think we should include text that is also in the thumbnail as Wikis are primarily a text-based medium. It also allows for text-only browsers and "readers" for the blind. - Dr Haggis - Talk 17:34, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)
- I agree. I've added the text back. -- Tom 19:30, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)
Contents |
no
this belongs on The Sneak-- Benol, aka Coach B 20:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
It only appers once, i might add. 14:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)user:haldo
- Please note that this conversation was about two years ago. Obviously, for better or worse, we've decided to keep it separate. --DorianGray 19:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
yes
this belongs on its own page. — talk Bubsty edits 01:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Old Timey manifestation of Biscuit Dough Hands Man?
As I was reading this page, I was reminded of the poor rendering of Strong Bad as Biscuit Dough Hands Man. Could this be another accidental equivalent?
Well, if The Dapper Swindler was a dubious rendering of Old-Timey Strong Bad, I'd say yes. But since it isn't... 71.231.56.40 21:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Ah, but do we KNOW that Buscuit Dough Hands Man *IS* Strong Bad? --Jrgilby 01:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
What The CRAP?!
Why do we still have this article? It's SOOOOOO pointless. can somebody PLEASE give a REASON to stand up for this article if they want to keep it? — Haldo (Talk | contribs) 19:50 (left unsigned)
oh. that sucked. I'm having troble putting up the template.... user:haldo