Talk:The Dapper Swindler

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(no)
m (Template: more)
 
(includes 21 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{deletedtalk|merge=The Sneak}}
I think we should include text that is also in the thumbnail as Wikis are primarily a text-based medium. It also allows for text-only browsers and "readers" for the blind. [[User:Drhaggis|<nowiki></nowiki>]]- [[User:Drhaggis|Dr Haggis]] - [[User talk: Drhaggis|Talk]] 17:34, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)
I think we should include text that is also in the thumbnail as Wikis are primarily a text-based medium. It also allows for text-only browsers and "readers" for the blind. [[User:Drhaggis|<nowiki></nowiki>]]- [[User:Drhaggis|Dr Haggis]] - [[User talk: Drhaggis|Talk]] 17:34, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)
Line 8: Line 9:
It only appers once, i might add. 14:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[[user:haldo]]
It only appers once, i might add. 14:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[[user:haldo]]
 +
:Please note that this conversation was about two years ago. Obviously, for better or worse, we've decided to keep it separate. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 19:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
== yes ==
== yes ==
Line 19: Line 21:
Ah, but do we KNOW that Buscuit Dough Hands Man *IS* Strong Bad? --[[User:Jrgilby|Jrgilby]] 01:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Ah, but do we KNOW that Buscuit Dough Hands Man *IS* Strong Bad? --[[User:Jrgilby|Jrgilby]] 01:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
== What The CRAP?! ==
 +
 +
Why do we still have this article? It's SOOOOOO pointless. can somebody PLEASE give a REASON to stand up for this article if they want to keep it? {{unsigned|Haldo|19:50}}
 +
:Put {{tl|tbd}} on the top of the page and we'll discuss it. {{User:Techgeekmbg/sig}} 00:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
oh. that sucked. I'm having troble putting up the template.... [[user:haldo]]
 +
:Done. And all characters, no matter how many appearances they have, merit page. '''Keep'''. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 13:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
::It is debatable, however, whether The Dapper Swindler can be considered a separate character. It's really just a bad sketch of The Sneak. I say '''merge''' with [[The Sneak]]. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 15:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
YESS! He is not his own character, but a drawing of the sneak, kind of like how it was hinted that [[Biscuit Dough Hands Man]] is strong bad, but it's not a deffinant answer. Back on topic, I say merge. [[user:haldo]]
 +
 +
If we do end up deleeting this page, we should have a notice on [[the sneak]]'s page requesting that no one brings it back. [[user:haldo]]
 +
:If the information is moved to The Sneak's page, we don't need to leave a note to tell that it's been moved from a deleted article. Oh, and '''merge'''. &mdash; {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 19:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
::Yes, let's merge. Info here is a bit too scarce, and we should be able to include it at [[The Sneak]]. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 19:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
:::Good idea. Both this article and The Sneak's page looks a bit bare. So '''merge'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
::::I will throw in with a '''merge''' vote as well. The Dapper Swindler is a marginal "character", and though it is similar to Biscuit Dough Hands Man, it's a one off so far.  Merging with The Sneak makes the most sense. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 20:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
Ok, teh request that no one brings up the dappr swindler is unessicary, but we should still have a re direct to [[the sneak]]'s page.
 +
:Have no fear, my friend. If we merge this article to The Sneak, the page will automatically be turned into a redirect to said article. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
::Well, I hope you like "cool" painting, because this has got to go.  '''Merge'''.  {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 17:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Template ==
 +
 +
This article really isn't deleted. I don't think it needs a deleted article template. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 22:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
:I {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Template%3Adeletedtalk&diff=515570&oldid=513723 changed}} {{t|deletedtalk}} so that it can account better for merged pages &mdash; I think this should work a bit better... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Current revision as of 22:36, 10 November 2007

DELETED!
This is the talk page of an article that has been merged with The Sneak. Please do not participate in the discussions archived here. If you can provide a reason for the existence of this page that hasn't been discussed below, you may start a new section. Please refer to the inclusion guidelines that are generally applied to judge an article's merit.

I think we should include text that is also in the thumbnail as Wikis are primarily a text-based medium. It also allows for text-only browsers and "readers" for the blind. - Dr Haggis - Talk 17:34, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)

I agree. I've added the text back. -- Tom 19:30, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)

Contents

[edit] no

this belongs on The Sneak-- Benol, aka Coach B 20:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

It only appers once, i might add. 14:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)user:haldo

Please note that this conversation was about two years ago. Obviously, for better or worse, we've decided to keep it separate. --DorianGray 19:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] yes

this belongs on its own page. — talk Bubsty edits 01:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Old Timey manifestation of Biscuit Dough Hands Man?

As I was reading this page, I was reminded of the poor rendering of Strong Bad as Biscuit Dough Hands Man. Could this be another accidental equivalent?

Well, if The Dapper Swindler was a dubious rendering of Old-Timey Strong Bad, I'd say yes. But since it isn't... 71.231.56.40 21:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah, but do we KNOW that Buscuit Dough Hands Man *IS* Strong Bad? --Jrgilby 01:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What The CRAP?!

Why do we still have this article? It's SOOOOOO pointless. can somebody PLEASE give a REASON to stand up for this article if they want to keep it? Haldo (Talk | contribs) 19:50 (left unsigned)

Put {{tbd}} on the top of the page and we'll discuss it. The Goblin!! 00:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

oh. that sucked. I'm having troble putting up the template.... user:haldo

Done. And all characters, no matter how many appearances they have, merit page. Keep. User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man 13:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
It is debatable, however, whether The Dapper Swindler can be considered a separate character. It's really just a bad sketch of The Sneak. I say merge with The Sneak. Has Matt? (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

YESS! He is not his own character, but a drawing of the sneak, kind of like how it was hinted that Biscuit Dough Hands Man is strong bad, but it's not a deffinant answer. Back on topic, I say merge. user:haldo

If we do end up deleeting this page, we should have a notice on the sneak's page requesting that no one brings it back. user:haldo

If the information is moved to The Sneak's page, we don't need to leave a note to tell that it's been moved from a deleted article. Oh, and merge. — SamSF%20sig.jpgFisher (Come in, Lambert.) 19:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, let's merge. Info here is a bit too scarce, and we should be able to include it at The Sneak. Heimstern Läufer 19:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Good idea. Both this article and The Sneak's page looks a bit bare. So merge. – The Chort 19:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I will throw in with a merge vote as well. The Dapper Swindler is a marginal "character", and though it is similar to Biscuit Dough Hands Man, it's a one off so far. Merging with The Sneak makes the most sense. wbwolf (t | ed) 20:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok, teh request that no one brings up the dappr swindler is unessicary, but we should still have a re direct to the sneak's page.

Have no fear, my friend. If we merge this article to The Sneak, the page will automatically be turned into a redirect to said article. – The Chort 19:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, I hope you like "cool" painting, because this has got to go. Merge. OptimisticFool 17:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template

This article really isn't deleted. I don't think it needs a deleted article template. User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man 22:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I changed {{deletedtalk}} so that it can account better for merged pages — I think this should work a bit better... Trey56 22:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools