Talk:The Dapper Swindler

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Current revision as of 22:36, 10 November 2007

This is the talk page of an article that has been merged with The Sneak. Please do not participate in the discussions archived here. If you can provide a reason for the existence of this page that hasn't been discussed below, you may start a new section. Please refer to the inclusion guidelines that are generally applied to judge an article's merit.

I think we should include text that is also in the thumbnail as Wikis are primarily a text-based medium. It also allows for text-only browsers and "readers" for the blind. - Dr Haggis - Talk 17:34, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)

I agree. I've added the text back. -- Tom 19:30, 11 Feb 2005 (MST)

[edit] no

this belongs on The Sneak-- Benol, aka Coach B 20:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

It only appers once, i might add. 14:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)user:haldo

Please note that this conversation was about two years ago. Obviously, for better or worse, we've decided to keep it separate. --DorianGray 19:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] yes

this belongs on its own page. — _talk Bubsty _edits 01:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Old Timey manifestation of Biscuit Dough Hands Man?

As I was reading this page, I was reminded of the poor rendering of Strong Bad as Biscuit Dough Hands Man. Could this be another accidental equivalent?

Well, if The Dapper Swindler was a dubious rendering of Old-Timey Strong Bad, I'd say yes. But since it isn't... 71.231.56.40 21:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah, but do we KNOW that Buscuit Dough Hands Man *IS* Strong Bad? --Jrgilby 01:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What The CRAP?!

Why do we still have this article? It's SOOOOOO pointless. can somebody PLEASE give a REASON to stand up for this article if they want to keep it? — Haldo (Talk | contribs) 19:50 (left unsigned)

Put {{tbd}} on the top of the page and we'll discuss it. ^{The Goblin!!} 00:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

oh. that sucked. I'm having troble putting up the template.... user:haldo

Done. And all characters, no matter how many appearances they have, merit page. Keep. Sam the Man 13:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

It is debatable, however, whether The Dapper Swindler can be considered a separate character. It's really just a bad sketch of The Sneak. I say merge with The Sneak. — Has Matt? (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

YESS! He is not his own character, but a drawing of the sneak, kind of like how it was hinted that Biscuit Dough Hands Man is strong bad, but it's not a deffinant answer. Back on topic, I say merge. user:haldo

If we do end up deleeting this page, we should have a notice on the sneak's page requesting that no one brings it back. user:haldo

If the information is moved to The Sneak's page, we don't need to leave a note to tell that it's been moved from a deleted article. Oh, and merge. — ^Sam_{Fisher (Come in, Lambert.)} 19:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, let's merge. Info here is a bit too scarce, and we should be able to include it at The Sneak. Heimstern Läufer 19:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Good idea. Both this article and The Sneak's page looks a bit bare. So merge. – The Chort 19:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

I will throw in with a merge vote as well. The Dapper Swindler is a marginal "character", and though it is similar to Biscuit Dough Hands Man, it's a one off so far. Merging with The Sneak makes the most sense. wbwolf (t | ed) 20:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok, teh request that no one brings up the dappr swindler is unessicary, but we should still have a re direct to the sneak's page.

Have no fear, my friend. If we merge this article to The Sneak, the page will automatically be turned into a redirect to said article. – The Chort 19:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, I hope you like "cool" painting, because this has got to go. Merge. OptimisticFool 17:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template

This article really isn't deleted. I don't think it needs a deleted article template. Sam the Man 22:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I changed {{deletedtalk}} so that it can account better for merged pages — I think this should work a bit better... Trey56 22:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)