Talk:Teddy Grahams

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(includes 5 intermediate revisions)
Line 2: Line 2:
There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
:They're not HR-specific and I'm not convinced they're used in a particularly unusual context (though spitting is arguably so).  Thoughts? (note: most of the info on this page appears in the minor food list) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54|170.223.0.54]] 20:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
:They're not HR-specific and I'm not convinced they're used in a particularly unusual context (though spitting is arguably so).  Thoughts? (note: most of the info on this page appears in the minor food list) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54|170.223.0.54]] 20:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
::I lean toward keeping it as a separate page — while Teddy Grahams do exist in real life, spitting them is pretty unusual.  With only the [[couch patch]] appearance, they should definitely be on [[Minor Foods]], but the second reference adds weight.  And sure, [[HRW:IG|the guidelines]] recommend 3—4 appearances, but this one feels significant enough to me in some intangible way. But it wouldn't be the end of the world if the page is redirected to [[Minor Foods#Teddy Grahams]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::On further consideration, I agree with Trey.  (And yeah, the guidelines are just that, guidelines.  Not hard-and-fast rules.  Exceptions can certainly be made.) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54|170.223.0.54]] 23:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::They're used pretty unusually and play an important role each time... I see no harm in '''keeping''' this page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::::We should wait until there are more references. [[User:StarFox|StarFox]] 22:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 +
::::::This discussion was closed the better part of a year ago. Unless you can come up with new arguments, please don't bring it back up. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 23:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Current revision as of 23:27, 28 January 2010

[edit] Enough references?

There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. Thy Not Dennis (t/c) 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

They're not HR-specific and I'm not convinced they're used in a particularly unusual context (though spitting is arguably so). Thoughts? (note: most of the info on this page appears in the minor food list) -170.223.0.54 20:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
I lean toward keeping it as a separate page — while Teddy Grahams do exist in real life, spitting them is pretty unusual. With only the couch patch appearance, they should definitely be on Minor Foods, but the second reference adds weight. And sure, the guidelines recommend 3—4 appearances, but this one feels significant enough to me in some intangible way. But it wouldn't be the end of the world if the page is redirected to Minor Foods#Teddy Grahams. Trey56 22:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
On further consideration, I agree with Trey. (And yeah, the guidelines are just that, guidelines. Not hard-and-fast rules. Exceptions can certainly be made.) -170.223.0.54 23:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
They're used pretty unusually and play an important role each time... I see no harm in keeping this page. — Defender1031*Talk 16:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
We should wait until there are more references. StarFox 22:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
This discussion was closed the better part of a year ago. Unless you can come up with new arguments, please don't bring it back up. --Jay stuck at home (Talk) 23:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Personal tools