Talk:Strong Bad checking more than one email
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Contents |
[edit] Rename
Should we rename this to Strong Bad answering more than one email? And what about capitalization? Loafing 11:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well he doesnt really answer several of them (in spring cleaning all of them just get deleted) so "checking" may be better. As for the capitalization...I dunno. Homestar-Winner (talk) 11:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, good point. I've removed the renaming template now. "Checking" is definitely better. Loafing 11:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cleanup
The appearances list needs some work.
[edit] image
Anyone have any ideas of a picture we could put on the page? Homestar-Winner (talk) 12:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
This page is a more wordy duplicate of Strong Bad Email Statistics#Strong Bad Emails Featuring More Than One Email. It should be redirected and it's content merged. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- This page should not be merged. We can just merge the Strong Bad Email Statistics#Strong Bad Emails Featuring More Than One Email onto this page. Sam the Man
- Replace "checking" with "featuring" and capitalise all the words. We can provide a link to this article on Strong Bad Email Statistics. – The Chort 17:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Elcool: merge and redirect. kai lyn 18:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Knowing that we already have this info on the Statistics page, I have to agree with the merge. — Has Matt? (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with The Chort. Maybe have a short segment and one of those "Main article" things... -- Super Martyo boing! 02:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Agree con El Chorto and Super Martyo Hermano. --DorianGray 02:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
DeleteMerge and redirect for the exact same reason I voted to delete that article about Hrwiki people who got their emails on Strong Bad Email: This info can already be found on Strong Bad Email Statistics. Bad Bad Guy 23:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)- I just updated that statisics section. Now it's even safer to redirect, imho. Bad Bad Guy 20:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- I vote for merge and redirect. — DNA Evidence (Talk | contribs) 20:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC) (left unsigned)
- Merge and redirect. Trey56 03:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- I vote for merge and redirect. — DNA Evidence (Talk | contribs) 20:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC) (left unsigned)
- I just updated that statisics section. Now it's even safer to redirect, imho. Bad Bad Guy 20:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Agree con El Chorto and Super Martyo Hermano. --DorianGray 02:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with The Chort. Maybe have a short segment and one of those "Main article" things... -- Super Martyo boing! 02:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Knowing that we already have this info on the Statistics page, I have to agree with the merge. — Has Matt? (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Elcool: merge and redirect. kai lyn 18:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Replace "checking" with "featuring" and capitalise all the words. We can provide a link to this article on Strong Bad Email Statistics. – The Chort 17:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
yeah yah, totally, yah Slipknot6477 02:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)