Talk:Preeeeow
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(This needs to be divided into two discussions) |
m (Talk:Preeow moved to Talk:Preeeeow) |
||
(includes 7 intermediate revisions) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I concur. We also might need to move some of the info to [[The Paper]]. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | :I concur. We also might need to move some of the info to [[The Paper]]. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 21:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
::I agree with the Rogue and Heimstern. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | ::I agree with the Rogue and Heimstern. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::The wrting is good, but I say marge it. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 01:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::You mean like Marge Simpson? {rim shot} {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 01:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::I added a link to the glossary until this is decided upon. I like it's current placement and moving this whole thing to the glossary will make a very large glossary entry, but whatever. <br/>-{{User:Houdin654jeff/sig}} 05:47, 30 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::Just to clarify, my thought on the matter was that we would move the barebones definition to the Glossary, while the more fleshed-out details would be merged into [[The Paper]]. But again, that's just me. Let's see what others think. | ||
== Image == | == Image == | ||
- | |||
'''EDIT CONFLICT:''' Does anyone else think that this page can use a better image? I'd like to see one of that notebook paper from [[part-time job]] where "preeeow" is actually written. Just a suggestion. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 21:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | '''EDIT CONFLICT:''' Does anyone else think that this page can use a better image? I'd like to see one of that notebook paper from [[part-time job]] where "preeeow" is actually written. Just a suggestion. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 21:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
:'''edit conflict note''' How do you capture screen shots from the actual cartoons? I was limited to what I could find already posted here at the Wiki when I made this article. | :'''edit conflict note''' How do you capture screen shots from the actual cartoons? I was limited to what I could find already posted here at the Wiki when I made this article. | ||
Line 11: | Line 14: | ||
:Take a look at [[HRWiki_talk:FAQ/3#How_do_you_make_a_snapshot.3F|this]] discussion.--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 21:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | :Take a look at [[HRWiki_talk:FAQ/3#How_do_you_make_a_snapshot.3F|this]] discussion.--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 21:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks Bkmlb. That was very helpful. New Preeow pic everyone! -{{User:Houdin654jeff/sig}} 22:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | ::Thanks Bkmlb. That was very helpful. New Preeow pic everyone! -{{User:Houdin654jeff/sig}} 22:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Suggested move to PrEEEEow == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Would anyone object to me moving this article to "preeeeow" (with 4 e's)? I realise that there is no canonical spelling, and even [[TBC]] are not always consistent with its use. Nevertheless, I would argue that the basis for the shortened version is not much of a time saver. I would be willing to create a redirect and update all the pertinent links to reflect a change. Reasoning: I just would prefer that the title be the same as the "official" spelling (from [[part-time job]]) as noted in the second paragraph. Do I have a biased view due to my username? Probably. Feedback? {{User:The Paper/sig}} 06:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | :I concur. I don't think those two extra e's are going to take up too much space, and this very page recognizes "Preeeeow" as the "official" spelling. (Of course, there should be a redirect from this spelling.) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
Current revision as of 15:44, 22 February 2006
[edit] Move this article?
Hmm, I think that this article should be moved to the Glossary. since it is a phrase. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 21:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- I concur. We also might need to move some of the info to The Paper. Heimstern Läufer 21:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- I agree with the Rogue and Heimstern. — It's dot com 21:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- The wrting is good, but I say marge it. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 01:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- You mean like Marge Simpson? {rim shot} — Has Matt? (talk) 01:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- I added a link to the glossary until this is decided upon. I like it's current placement and moving this whole thing to the glossary will make a very large glossary entry, but whatever.
---Jeff J. W.(Talk·Contribs) 05:47, 30 December 2005 (UTC)- Just to clarify, my thought on the matter was that we would move the barebones definition to the Glossary, while the more fleshed-out details would be merged into The Paper. But again, that's just me. Let's see what others think.
- I added a link to the glossary until this is decided upon. I like it's current placement and moving this whole thing to the glossary will make a very large glossary entry, but whatever.
- You mean like Marge Simpson? {rim shot} — Has Matt? (talk) 01:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- The wrting is good, but I say marge it. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 01:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- I agree with the Rogue and Heimstern. — It's dot com 21:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image
EDIT CONFLICT: Does anyone else think that this page can use a better image? I'd like to see one of that notebook paper from part-time job where "preeeow" is actually written. Just a suggestion. — Has Matt? (talk) 21:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- edit conflict note How do you capture screen shots from the actual cartoons? I was limited to what I could find already posted here at the Wiki when I made this article.
---Jeff J. W.(Talk·Contribs) 21:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)- Take a look at this discussion.-- Bkmlb(talk to me·stuff I did) 21:38, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks Bkmlb. That was very helpful. New Preeow pic everyone! ---Jeff J. W.(Talk·Contribs) 22:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Suggested move to PrEEEEow
Would anyone object to me moving this article to "preeeeow" (with 4 e's)? I realise that there is no canonical spelling, and even TBC are not always consistent with its use. Nevertheless, I would argue that the basis for the shortened version is not much of a time saver. I would be willing to create a redirect and update all the pertinent links to reflect a change. Reasoning: I just would prefer that the title be the same as the "official" spelling (from part-time job) as noted in the second paragraph. Do I have a biased view due to my username? Probably. Feedback? —THE PAPER PREEEOW 06:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- I concur. I don't think those two extra e's are going to take up too much space, and this very page recognizes "Preeeeow" as the "official" spelling. (Of course, there should be a redirect from this spelling.) Heimstern Läufer 06:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)