Talk:Fully Human Characters
From Homestar Runner Wiki
DrPepper42 (Talk | contribs) (→Page title) |
(→Page title) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
How about just we just drop the "Clearly" and have '''Human Characters'''? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 11:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | How about just we just drop the "Clearly" and have '''Human Characters'''? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 11:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I agree fully. [[User:DrPepper42|DrPepper42]] 19:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | :I agree fully. [[User:DrPepper42|DrPepper42]] 19:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think human references or something of that nature would be good | ||
| + | [[User:Homsarstrongbad150|Homsarstrongbad150]] 22:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:27, 4 April 2008
Minor humans
What about minor characters like the guitar player from for kids and the hot '60s looking girls and SBASAF personnel from space program? Do entries on this page have to have more prominent roles? 
Trey56 05:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- You could create a "minor characters" category. Retromaniac 22:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Biscuit Hands
If Biscuit Dough Hands Man has biscuits for hands, he wouldn't be CLEARLY a human, would he? Homestar-winner 11:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agreee. He's human "except for...". This theory could be applied to a lot of characters, most notably, Strong Mad and the members of TGS.--.
Johnny Jupiter! talk cont 21:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Page title
Is there something better than "Clearly human characters" that we could consider? I realize it's subtly different from "Human characters", but it just seems not-quite-right to me. — It's dot com 15:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I thought about that when I made Human characters as a redirect. It kinda reminds me of how "Obviously Phony Aliases" was changed to "Aliases Used in Prank Calls". I think we should change it to "Human characters" or something similar. — Has Matt? (talk) 15:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Possibly "Human-like Characters"? --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 20:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- "Humanoid characters?" --Jnelson09 22:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Humanoid Characters? C'mon. That sounds like their robots. In my opinion, it should be "Human-like Characters", like TSG3 said.
Sam the Man 
14:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Bad could be considered a humanoid character... DEI
DAT
VM
┌datvm center\super contra┘ 14:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Humanoid Characters? C'mon. That sounds like their robots. In my opinion, it should be "Human-like Characters", like TSG3 said.
- "Humanoid characters?" --Jnelson09 22:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Possibly "Human-like Characters"? --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 20:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Keep the title! 
HAJ 
17:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
How about just we just drop the "Clearly" and have Human Characters? – The Chort 11:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- I agree fully. DrPepper42 19:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I think human references or something of that nature would be good Homsarstrongbad150 22:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
