Talk:More Like You Write A Book About Come-back Jokes, NERD!!

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Delete

I don't really think this merits a page. We usually don't create pages with two appearances, especially if one of them was in a garage sale with many other two-appearance items. The main appearance was in 50 emails; it was only on sale in "garage sale". —FireBird|Talk 19:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Although there's a page for Authorless Books, there isn't more than a category for ones with authors. — Lapper (talk) 20:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
The book The Fish was Delish and it made Quite a Dish! does have a page and so do Count Longardeaux's Book and Three-to-One Marny which was my rationale that established precedent for the page. --Stux 20:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm going with Stux on this one, even though the title is a bit, eh... how you say... not short. Has Matt? (talk) 23:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
I think this page title is too long any way we can make it shorter?? --TheThin 00:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
This page is perfectly valid. Frankly, if you don't think this is big enough to have a page for it, check out This. Seriously (Talk) 00:08, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Huh --TheThin 00:08, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Qermaq 04:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
I don't have a strong opinion on the article itself, but if we decide to keep it, then the page title is fine. Some titles are simply lengthy; we shouldn't be afraid of them. — It's dot com 00:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
If there is no further oposition, I will take the delete tag out in like several days or so. --Stux 21:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
I say, delete it. It was barely shown in the two SBEmails. Bluebry 21:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
I disagree. Like I said, there isn't much to go against for this page. Yuo guys are peing hypocritcal if you think that Strong Bad's Capsela should not be deleted yet this should. Seriously (Talk) 23:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Just so you know, Bluebry was actually for the deletion of The Strongs' Capsela, not against it. I still think this page should be kept, though. Has Matt? (talk) 23:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Bluebry, if you think this was barely shown, look at The Fish was Delish and it made Quite a Dish! It appeared in an easter egg, just like this book, and it was only showed once, while this book was showed twice. So I say keep. DBK! 02:46, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Keep per DBK's reason. And look, a nice little category for it to call home! —BazookaJoe 02:51, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
We could create a page for minor books. You know, combine all of these articles with new ones of minor books. I dunno. There are some, hem hem, minor books on the items page. I don't know. Oh, and Seriously, let's not bring that into this conversation. Hypocrasy. Or, however it's spelled. Bluebry 03:59, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
I meant, Items. Bluebry 04:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't see how this could possibly be deleted, when there are so many articles less significant than this, like DBK said. Unless I am mistaken, the vote is 7 to 3, so it should be kept. SaltyTalk! 04:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

If your friends jumped off a cliff, would you? If there are articles smaller than this, does that mean they also shouldn't be deleted? And I mean no offense to anyone's opinion, this is just mine. Bluebry 04:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
No I'm not saying that The Fish was Delish and it made Quite a Dish! is insignificant, I'm just saying that if that stays when it was showed less, this should stay also. DBK! 04:13, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
And it stays even though it needs to be deleted too. Bluebry 23:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Six months later and it's still here. I believe that this should go. Staple Sauce used to have its own page, but was subsequently deleted because it was insignificant. Here's what I think: Count Longardeaux's Book has a page dedicated to it for the same reason Mount RidesPlace USA has a page dedicated to it. It's true that they only appeared in one e-mail each, but the e-mails they appeared in revolved around them. This particular book, on the other hand, lends almost nothing to 50 Emails, and if it were entirely removed, it wouldn't affect it that much. It should go. BoobusToober 04:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

3 years later, still here. I think this should go. Besides, isn't the guideline for these kinds of article have to have a minimum of three appearances?--Record307 Talk/Contribs 16:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Although this page is page is minimalistic, let it be known that items, as long as they had a role in a toon and are original, deserve a page. Pages that seem useless or too infrequent aren't nessicarily bad. They may be simple and uninformative in some extreme cases, but they meet criteria none-the-less. At least, most of them do. Of all minor items, this one seems to warrent a page the most. It has a long screen time and is an interesting Easter Egg. The three appearence guideling is for Running Gags, I think, and even then, not always the case. With TWO appearences, this is page-worthy. I'm not saying I like this page (I don't really care either way), but I see no reason to delete it. --Jellote wuz here 17:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools