Talk:Might Could

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(add section, and if you're going to turn this into a debate...)
(Scope: wait what?!)
Line 5: Line 5:
::I think this is a shorter section of [[Engrish]]. '''Delete'''. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
::I think this is a shorter section of [[Engrish]]. '''Delete'''. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
:::I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random [[malapropisms]] that are in [[Engrish]].  '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
:::I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random [[malapropisms]] that are in [[Engrish]].  '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::Woah woah woah, this was a question about the scope of the page, not a deletion discussion... There's absolutely no reason to delete. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:22, 9 February 2009

Scope

Should the name/scope of this page be tweaked? For example, the best caper example is actually a quadruple modal including things other than might and could -132.183.151.171 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

That's what Deliberately Poor English is for. This is just to document a specific bad grammarism that's appeared a noteble amount of times. Dr. Clash 21:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I think this is a shorter section of Engrish. Delete. MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random malapropisms that are in Engrish. Keep wbwolf (t | ed) 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Woah woah woah, this was a question about the scope of the page, not a deletion discussion... There's absolutely no reason to delete. — Defender1031*Talk 22:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools