Talk:Might Could
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Scope: wait what?!) |
(Whoa there.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | |||
==Scope== | ==Scope== | ||
Should the name/scope of this page be tweaked? For example, the best caper example is actually a quadruple modal including things other than might and could -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.171|132.183.151.171]] 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | Should the name/scope of this page be tweaked? For example, the best caper example is actually a quadruple modal including things other than might and could -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.171|132.183.151.171]] 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
:::I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random [[malapropisms]] that are in [[Engrish]]. '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | :::I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random [[malapropisms]] that are in [[Engrish]]. '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::Woah woah woah, this was a question about the scope of the page, not a deletion discussion... There's absolutely no reason to delete. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ::::Woah woah woah, this was a question about the scope of the page, not a deletion discussion... There's absolutely no reason to delete. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::Chill, people. I was just saying that, like [[Be's]], this follows the "three times" running gag rule, and that DPE is to document all that other crap. {{User:Dr._Clash/sig}} 22:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:33, 9 February 2009
Scope
Should the name/scope of this page be tweaked? For example, the best caper example is actually a quadruple modal including things other than might and could -132.183.151.171 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's what Deliberately Poor English is for. This is just to document a specific bad grammarism that's appeared a noteble amount of times.
Dr. Clash 21:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is a shorter section of Engrish. Delete. — MichaelXX2
22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random malapropisms that are in Engrish. Keep wbwolf (t | ed) 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Woah woah woah, this was a question about the scope of the page, not a deletion discussion... There's absolutely no reason to delete. — Defender1031*Talk 22:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random malapropisms that are in Engrish. Keep wbwolf (t | ed) 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is a shorter section of Engrish. Delete. — MichaelXX2
