Talk:Might Could

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(add section, and if you're going to turn this into a debate...)
(→Scope: wait what?!)
Line 5: Line 5:
::I think this is a shorter section of [[Engrish]]. '''Delete'''. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
::I think this is a shorter section of [[Engrish]]. '''Delete'''. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
:::I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random [[malapropisms]] that are in [[Engrish]].  '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
:::I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random [[malapropisms]] that are in [[Engrish]].  '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::Woah woah woah, this was a question about the scope of the page, not a deletion discussion... There's absolutely no reason to delete. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:22, 9 February 2009

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Scope

Should the name/scope of this page be tweaked? For example, the best caper example is actually a quadruple modal including things other than might and could -132.183.151.171 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

That's what Deliberately Poor English is for. This is just to document a specific bad grammarism that's appeared a noteble amount of times. Dr. Clash 21:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I think this is a shorter section of Engrish. Delete. — MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I think this is a worthy article, since it is a bit peculiar construction, and repeated multiple times, unlike random malapropisms that are in Engrish. Keep wbwolf (t | ed) 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Woah woah woah, this was a question about the scope of the page, not a deletion discussion... There's absolutely no reason to delete. — Defender1031*Talk 22:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Might_Could"
Personal tools