Talk:Lil' Strong Bad
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (→Article name: should we move this?) |
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (→Article name: I guess so) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
There are now at least two references to "Lil'" (as opposed to "Little") Strong Bad on the official site, [[origins]] and [[record book]]. I can find no mention of the other spelling. Should we change the article name here? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:50, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC) | There are now at least two references to "Lil'" (as opposed to "Little") Strong Bad on the official site, [[origins]] and [[record book]]. I can find no mention of the other spelling. Should we change the article name here? — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:50, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC) | ||
:In [[stand-up]], Coach Z ''does'' enunciate the word "little", but we could view that simply as an adjective. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] | :In [[stand-up]], Coach Z ''does'' enunciate the word "little", but we could view that simply as an adjective. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] | ||
| + | ::Nobody replied to this, but I see that the article has been moved, so ''somebody'' must have agreed. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 04:59, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:59, 27 July 2005
It says "He wears underwear. . . unlike his grown-up counterpart", so I think the latest edit can sorta be reverted, or at least rephrased.
Sould this be moved to Li'l Strong Bad? that what he is called in the record book and his birthday sign. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 11:01, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)
inverted
maybe a comment about his eye shine (or whatever its called) is inverted compared to the strongbad of today
Article name
There are now at least two references to "Lil'" (as opposed to "Little") Strong Bad on the official site, origins and record book. I can find no mention of the other spelling. Should we change the article name here? — It's dot com 15:50, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- In stand-up, Coach Z does enunciate the word "little", but we could view that simply as an adjective. — It's dot com
- Nobody replied to this, but I see that the article has been moved, so somebody must have agreed. — It's dot com 04:59, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)
