Talk:Karen Wagner

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Validity)
m (Ring Cycle)
Line 17: Line 17:
:Yeah, right from [http://www.lsureveille.com/vfeedback/frontend.v?ACTION=display_post&Post_ID=b41cd92341ef6d6caa751f039a2da675 the source]. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 23:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
:Yeah, right from [http://www.lsureveille.com/vfeedback/frontend.v?ACTION=display_post&Post_ID=b41cd92341ef6d6caa751f039a2da675 the source]. -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 23:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 +
::When she sent me an email earlier today, it was signed Karen Wagner, so
 +
i wonder if this article should be re-titled/re-directed to Karen Wagner (Chapman)? {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 18:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:28, 8 November 2006

This page, along with some others, are pretty unneccesary. Anyone think I should make a "minor Chapman family members" page? I think it'll be a lot more useful than having many very minor pages. teeeffoh! 18:50, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Which ones were you thinking of? -AtionSong 19:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
No more "Minor such-and-such" pages, please. —BazookaJoe 19:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
I know what you mean, but having this page is like TBC making a documentary about nuclear physics (it barely matters). teeeffoh! 19:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

No insult to the idea, but for one thing I don't like the value implied by "minor" family member (just because they don't make a flash cartoon). And secondly, I'd just like to remind us that TBC seem to be reluctant to provide public insight into their extended family, and I'd like to respect that. Any form of research that goes beyond stray comments they might make in interviews would be distasteful to me. (This page doesn't do that, of course, but I just wanted to head off any kind of "family members" project at the pass.) Now, ALL that said, there's nothing wrong with short pages when there isn't much info to know. People have questioned the legitimacy of such people-pages before, as in Talk:Ryan Bradley; see Tom's comments there. —AbdiViklas 19:19, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Ooh. Point made. teeeffoh! 19:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

We could just have a fun fact referencing Karen at TBC's page. --Sam Goldfish 19:23, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Validity

Does anybody know whether or not the info I found about Karen being the E-Commerce director is true or not? The site seemed like a reliable source, but there always must be some doubt with information found on the internet. -AtionSong 19:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

There is now, I talked to her today, she was manning the phones at the homestarrunner store. I R F 16:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Ring Cycle

Shouldn't there be a dash between "Chapman" and "Wagner"? Or is it like that in te source material?

Yeah, right from the source. -- Tom 23:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
When she sent me an email earlier today, it was signed Karen Wagner, so

i wonder if this article should be re-titled/re-directed to Karen Wagner (Chapman)? I R F 18:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools