Talk:Jerome

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(No, seriously, delete: Keepu)
Line 16: Line 16:
:::::::::This is an [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Jerome&diff=146122&oldid=133588 inside joke], not a running gag, so '''keep'''. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 19:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
:::::::::This is an [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Jerome&diff=146122&oldid=133588 inside joke], not a running gag, so '''keep'''. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 19:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
::::::::::Agree. Inside joke. Like many of the other "names of significance" (Dan, Dennis, etc.), --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 19:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
::::::::::Agree. Inside joke. Like many of the other "names of significance" (Dan, Dennis, etc.), --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 19:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 +
:::::::::::This might be an inside joke, but it seems to be a mere coincidence. '''BALEETED'''! --[[User:Collin Diver|Collin Diver]] 16:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:44, 31 March 2007

I don't think this page should be deleted. I think it's a prefectly legit inside joke. Heimstern Läufer 23:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

I don't either, but Seriously apparently really wanted the deletion templates up and was clogging recent changes, so I made them for him/her. Seriously, if you have a good reason to delete it, post it here! — talk Bubsty edits 23:31, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Looks like seriously removed the template, meaning he/she is fine with the article. I'll take the template off here then. — talk Bubsty edits 23:32, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
I think that it should definitely be deleted. First of all, unlike Dan, it only appears twice. Second of all, we don't have any information other than the fact that he appears to be a boy. Mikatoo 20:50, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

No, seriously, delete

This has 2 appearances, one of which is said for a second on the CD, not even on the site. This is really not noteworthy, I say delete. Dr. Clash 22:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

No. It's a perfectly legit inside joke. With the previous votes, no delete won the debate before... 3-2 No Delete. --TotalSpaceshipGirl3 22:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't quite see the point in this article. Loafing 00:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
The criterion for a running gag is that it have three or more appearances. This one only has two, and so the second appearance is simply a reference to the first — it's noted this way on Strong Badia National Anthem#Inside References. So, until a third appearance, er, appears, I move that this be deleted. Trey56 00:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
I agree with statements, er, stated, above. Delete. Has Matt? (talk) 00:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Once again, delete. Dr. Clash 00:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
I think that, despite the obscurity of it, and only 2 appearances of it, it should stay, because while it doesn't appear much, it is noteworthy. At least, it's noteworthy enough for TBC to mention it more than once. The_3000th_Flare 20:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
  1. Haddiman I really don't think Jerome is all important unless he makes a third appaearance, if he will make a third appearence I say he stays otherwise [thumbs down}.
Historically, this article has been in the Inside Jokes category rather than Running Gags. I'd consider that a more appropriate description of this article. I have stated multiple times that I'm in favor of keeping this article, and still am. Heimstern Läufer 19:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
This is an inside joke, not a running gag, so keep. —BazookaJoe 19:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Agree. Inside joke. Like many of the other "names of significance" (Dan, Dennis, etc.), --DorianGray 19:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
This might be an inside joke, but it seems to be a mere coincidence. BALEETED! --Collin Diver 16:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools