Talk:Children

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Necessary?)
Line 12: Line 12:
:Children are referenced pretty rarely. And when they are, you don't "see them", they're just mentioned. I don't think we need this.[[User:Timic83|Timic83]] 05:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
:Children are referenced pretty rarely. And when they are, you don't "see them", they're just mentioned. I don't think we need this.[[User:Timic83|Timic83]] 05:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
::This is a stub, there are more references out there, and even still, we have 6 references already, and you see the [[The Sad Kids]] and [[Nibbles]] and surely there are more, how are they not referenced often?--{{User:Slipstream/sig}} 11:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
::This is a stub, there are more references out there, and even still, we have 6 references already, and you see the [[The Sad Kids]] and [[Nibbles]] and surely there are more, how are they not referenced often?--{{User:Slipstream/sig}} 11:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 +
::There are a number of item pages in the wiki (for example [[Boats]]) where the reference is infrequent or rare.  If the Children page is deleted (treating it as an item), then the other items that are infrequently mentioned or notice should also be revaluated.  This would be a case of list creep. [[User:Wbwolf|Wbwolf]] 02:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:47, 5 July 2007

Please Help

This is such a large topic I am surprised no one has created it yet. Please contribute. --~ SlipStream 05:46, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Necessary?

I really doubt that this page is necessary. the user above claims that this topic is so big, so why didn't somebody create it? Children is not really a real topic, IMO. --The Goblin!! 06:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

With so many references, doesn't it qualify as a running gag yet? There are less notable articles on this wiki that are allowed to exist, I am not being biased because I just created it, I just don't see how it's not a real topic.--~ SlipStream 06:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Why don't don't you think this isn't necessary Techgeekmbg. I think it's fine. If you think this should be merged into Parents, that's not a likely going to happen. PBS, is possibly a choice. User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man 14:25, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't really think it's fair to merge into PBS, it's not made completely for children, it's just a public channel--~ SlipStream 01:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Children are referenced pretty rarely. And when they are, you don't "see them", they're just mentioned. I don't think we need this.Timic83 05:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
This is a stub, there are more references out there, and even still, we have 6 references already, and you see the The Sad Kids and Nibbles and surely there are more, how are they not referenced often?--~ SlipStream 11:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
There are a number of item pages in the wiki (for example Boats) where the reference is infrequent or rare. If the Children page is deleted (treating it as an item), then the other items that are infrequently mentioned or notice should also be revaluated. This would be a case of list creep. Wbwolf 02:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools