Talk:Big Butts

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 23:29, 17 September 2006

Delete?

This is one Strong Bad would love to DELETE! because it's total crap. The words "big" and "butt" are used in the same sentence thrice in the whole site, what's the big deal? We don't need any butt pages. MC Otaku 06:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Actually, we have a lot of butt pages. --DorianGray

I'm referring specifically to Butt, Butt-Patting and this abombination of a page. MC Otaku 07:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

So what exactly is your problem with the page other than it referring to butts? Loafing 07:16, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

That it's completely unnecessary and taking ridiculous to a level hardly comprehendable by the human brain. That's what my problem is. MC Otaku 07:18, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

So you don't have any other reason except for not liking it? Loafing 07:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Besides that it's completely unnecessary in every way and it makes us look like fools? MC Otaku 07:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, you've said that a few times now. It would be helpful if you could say why you think this page is unnecessary. Loafing 08:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I said why a few times now. MC Otaku 09:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry MC Otaku, but you should stop whining. Butt is a necessary disambig page because, like DorianGray said, we have a lot of butt-related articles. As for Butt-Patting, it's an obvious running gag and deserves an article. Granted, this article needs serious revision, but big butts are a running gag so this article should stay. ^Sam_{Fisher (Come in, Lambert.)} 9:37, 17 September 2006

I believe that even though there are little sightings of this, it's still very relevant to the wiki. I vote no delort. Bluebry 22:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Anyone who thinks "big butt" is a running gag in Homestar Runner doesn't know what a running gag is. MC Otaku 22:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

No personal attacks, please. Exept that saying that the page is "total crap", "abombination" and "completely unnecessary", You didn't mention even once why you think that way. Why is it not a running gag. To our defenition, a unique concept that repeat itself at least three times, is a runnign gag (with sometimes a few exceptions). — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 22:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I've said it a thousand times now. It happens three times, and the chances that it is intended as a "running gag" or that the Brothers Chaps have even noticed the pattern at all is a million to one. MC Otaku 23:29, 17 September 2006 (UTC)