Talk:Acknowledged Update Delays

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Talk:Important Email Delays moved to Talk:Acknowledged Email Delays: tall page request, clearness)
(Move)
Line 17: Line 17:
:I agree. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
:I agree. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Done-[[User:LordQuackingstick|LordQuackingstick]] 02:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
== Cleanup ==
== Cleanup ==
Well, I messed around with it a little. Is there anything else we need to do? {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, I messed around with it a little. Is there anything else we need to do? {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:24, 2 January 2007

Deletion

I can understand sbemail 150, but just barely, yet sbemail 100's "delay cartoon" was definately to fool people going to sbemail100.html, and I believe was released at the time of flashback. Even if it wasn't, it didn't talk about any sort of delay. I vote delete. Bluebry 21:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

All I could think of is Missing Lappy, but without SBEmail100, it's only two appearances. Unless someone comes up with another one, I vote to delete. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 21:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, there's a new one on there, but the way the delay is displayed is COMPLETELY unrelated. I still vote delete. Bluebry 22:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Is there any reason that Not the 100th Email!!! shouldn't be on here. Also, I wanna know if, even if the article is DELETED!!! that I was still right to make it.. because it says to be bold and all...-LordQuackingstick 22:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Not the 100th Email!!! didn't actually mention anything about an email delay. Bluebry 22:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Yeah it did; if I remember correctly, Homestar asked Strong Bad "When're you gonna make it already?" But was I right to make it in the first place?-LordQuackingstick 22:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm...well whaddya know, it kinda does that, so I guess if you wanted you could add that back. And if you think something's pageworthy, it is suggested that you, well, make it a page. ;-) Bluebry 22:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Yes, it was a good idea to make this page, well done! And don't worry too much about the deletion tag. It was put up because we usually require at least three instances of something to accept it as notable. I think we've got that covered now. The article might still be moved to a new name to be a bit more inclusive. That's also normal for new articles. Feel free to voice your opinion about deletion and moving here! You have a say in it just like everybody else. Loafing 22:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. You're a real state trooper.-LordQuackingstick 22:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Actually, that's not the reason the tag's put up. The appearances on this page, while they do happen to do with sbemail delays, have pretty much NOTHING IN COMMON. In reality, it seems that only army, geddup noise, and redesign are common, and that can still be noted on their pages (which they already are, if I'm correct). Otherwise, Sbemail 150?!? was released before alternate universe to explain the delay, Not the 100th Sbemail!!! explained the delay at the time of flashback's release (and was a secret page), and unlike those two, invisibility's delay was pretty much "caused" by vacation. I still vote delete. Bluebry 22:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Move

I suggest we move this article to Acknowledged Email Delays or something like that. That makes more sense. Loafing 22:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Bluebry 22:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Done-LordQuackingstick 02:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup

Well, I messed around with it a little. Is there anything else we need to do? Bluebry 22:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools