HRWiki talk:Protected page

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 02:17, 27 February 2006

Suggestion: Semi-protect?

What if we also had a semi protect for pages, so only logged in members could edit, which would reduce vandalism without removing to point of a wiki. This would be helpful on pages like Strong Bad Email, which are vandalized frequently, but also edited helpfully frequently -- nintendorulez 14:58, 12 Mar 2005 (MST)

I don't think this is possible, and it would ruin the point of a wiki. →[[User:FireBird|FireBird]]

Exactly right, Firebird. -- Tom 11:56, 13 Mar 2005 (MST)

Plus, that would be completely pointless right now, seeing as annonymous editing is disabled. — _talk Bubsty _edits 18:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

problem on teh SB e-mail page

under fun facts it says "strongbad has checked 163 e-mails" it should be 136, not 163. but the page is protected.

I've unprotected the page, but I believe that is referring to the actual number of emails he has answered. In some cases, he answers more than one, such as 50 emails and spring cleaning. -- Tom 06:36, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Wrong protection

I've noticed some of the pages that are protected, even though they are obviously not compiant to these guidelines. Would a sysop unprotect them? If you need a list, I'll TRY and find them all. Bluebry 01:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

I'll take a list, thanks. -- Tom 01:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Lemme find 'em all. Bluebry 02:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

1. User:Drhaggis
2. User:Jay
3. User:Thunderbird L17/Sysops

These are all I could find, really. And um, 1) They're not high-visibility, because they're user pages 2) Not logos 3) Not Mediawiki There are the reasons for them, too. Oh, yeah, no hard feelings on the users who have the pages. Bluebry 02:07, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

I'll add the image JsJAd.PNG which was protected "Because I feel like it, that's why." - Qermaq - (^T/C)  02:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)