HRWiki:Sandbox

From Homestar Runner Wiki

The Sandbox is an HRWiki namespace page designed for testing and experimenting with wiki syntax. Feel free to try your skills at formatting here: click on edit, make your changes, and click 'Save page' when you are finished. Content added here will not stay permanently. If you need help editing, see Help:Editing.

---

something's not quite right for me

Um... is that an honest issue? Cause the pic is 20px high. Isn't that what it's supposed to be?--.Johnny Jupiter! ^talk _cont 05:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but (at least on my browser) it's sticking out at the bottom of the box, and there seems to be an invisible part of your talk page link sticking out at the right of the box (you see it when you move the mouse over it). Loafing 05:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, the image is sticking out the bottom for me too. Do I need to shrink it, or is just a couple 2 or 3 pixles not enough to worry about? As for the space at the end, that's cause I used "position: relative; left: -17px;" to make the "cont" go under the "talk". Is there an easier way to do that?--.Johnny Jupiter! ^talk _cont 05:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I suppose the negative placement for cont and talk cause both the image displacement as well as the phantom link on the right. If you can find a better way of doing that, then you can leave the image as it is. Loafing 05:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Me too!

 Loafing

Natural indents

I would like to propose this idea. I think it's a good idea and I think you'll agree. It basically entails that all X be changed to Y. Feel free to critique. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I actually think that's a pretty good idea. Let's get those X changed to those Y! — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, definitely. X has needed to be Y for a long time. After this, maybe we can get A and B going, too. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Let's go for it as soon as possible. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Whoa there. I don't think we should go around screwing with X. X is X and Y is Y. We shouldn't change X to Y. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

X is interchangable with Y, and Y is more pleasing and better overall. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

No, it isn't. Semantically, X is this, and Y is that. X and Y are not alike enough to be interchanged. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I think it's a good proposal. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Threaded indents

I would like to propose this idea. I think it's a good idea and I think you'll agree. It basically entails that all X be changed to Y. Feel free to critique. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I actually think that's a pretty good idea. Let's get those X changed to those Y! — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, definitely. X has needed to be Y for a long time. After this, maybe we can get A and B going, too. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Let's go for it as soon as possible. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Whoa there. I don't think we should go around screwing with X. X is X and Y is Y. We shouldn't change X to Y. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

X is interchangable with Y, and Y is more pleasing and better overall. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

No, it isn't. Semantically, X is this, and Y is that. X and Y are not alike enough to be interchanged. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I think it's a good proposal. — Lapper (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

This would be great if everyone always double spaced their replies, always put exactly the intended amount of colons, and never wrote more than 25 words in a post—preferably fewer than 10. — It's dot com 05:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)