HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 3 (Jan 18-24))
(HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 1 (Jan 4-10))
Line 138: Line 138:
:::It's actually the 7th anniversary, not the 6th. And [[Pan Pan]], [[Under Construction]] and [[Twenty THANXty Six]] were featured (at least that last one will be this Thanksgiving), too, though. It's just too bad that they have still not yet completed [[Stinkoman 20X6]] or we could do that, too. Anyway, how about doing [[Cheatball]]? That article is long enough, I would think. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 00:51, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
:::It's actually the 7th anniversary, not the 6th. And [[Pan Pan]], [[Under Construction]] and [[Twenty THANXty Six]] were featured (at least that last one will be this Thanksgiving), too, though. It's just too bad that they have still not yet completed [[Stinkoman 20X6]] or we could do that, too. Anyway, how about doing [[Cheatball]]? That article is long enough, I would think. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 00:51, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
::::Yeah, I guess Cheatball could work instead.  I wasn't sure at first if it'd be long enough. Another possibility could be [[20X6 vs. 1936]].  Either one would be fine. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
::::Yeah, I guess Cheatball could work instead.  I wasn't sure at first if it'd be long enough. Another possibility could be [[20X6 vs. 1936]].  Either one would be fine. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::::I don't think it should be one where Stinkoman loses, I defiantly, I mean, Definitely vote Cheatball [[User:McArbys|The McArby!]] 02:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 2]] (Jan 11-17)===
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 2]] (Jan 11-17)===

Revision as of 02:13, 15 November 2009

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations.

Contents

Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:

Discussion archives

Other Discussion | 2005, Weeks 26-29 | 2005, Weeks 30-39 | 2005, Weeks 40-52

2006, Weeks 1-10 | 2006, Weeks 11-20 | 2006, Weeks 21-30 | 2006, Weeks 31-40 | 2006, Weeks 41-52

2007, Weeks 1-10 | 2007, Weeks 11-20 | 2007, Weeks 21-30 | 2007, Weeks 31-40 | 2007, Weeks 41-52

2008, Weeks 1-10 | 2008, Weeks 11-20 | 2008, Weeks 21-30 | 2008, Weeks 31-40 | 2008, Weeks 41-52

2009, Weeks 1-10 | 2009, Weeks 11-20 | 2009, Weeks 21-30 | 2009, Weeks 31-40 | 2009, Weeks 41-53

Article discussions

HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 46 (Nov 9-15)

For this week, we should do another Teen Girl Squad character, one who is a staple of the series: Arrow'd Guy! MHarrington 17:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

I was thinking about doing the Monosodium Dreams, assuming we haven't already done it. Espemon333 14:23, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
What about The movie theater... The battle of Strong Badia is also a good one... cash money tc 15:23, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
We have not shown Monosodium Dreams or The Movie Theater yet, so why don't we do them in the near future? We could do one next week and then the next one two weeks later, since the week before that is Thanksgiving and I have an idea in mind for that one already. MHarrington 16:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Just a comment: remember we are trying to keep FAS to only 10 weeks ahead. We've been creeping up lately (and I've been guilty of same). wbwolf (t | ed) 19:36, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Wbwolf's right. We'll go ahead and leave it for now, but let's keep it down to 10 weeks in advance of the current week in the future. Another thing: don't forget that in a discussion, if you propose a new idea after someone else's, you should always respond to the previous one (perhaps giving a reason you think your choice is more suitable). Otherwise, it's not really a discussion, and it's hard to determine where consensus really lies. (Don't forget that this isn't a vote, contrary to what it may seem sometimes.)
As for my opinion: I do think Arrow'd Guy really deserves a turn in the spotlight, particularly because it's been a while since we've had a TGS-related feature. The other two ideas suggested also look deserving, so I suggest we keep them in mind for the near future. Heimstern Läufer 09:19, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
But wait, wouldn't we have just done TGS 13 for week 39? The Wheelchair 01:36, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes, but that doesn't mean that something like this can't be done for a long time if that's what we go with then. MHarrington 14:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Well we did do TGS 13, But Arrow'd Guy works for me. Monosodium, your time to shine comes soon. Espemon333 01:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I'd forgotten we had TGS 13 on the queue. Oh well, I stand corrected. It's still not going to be a problem to do Arrow'd guy this week, though we could delay him if people want to spread out TGS a bit. Heimstern Läufer 03:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
No, Arrow'd Guy's been delayed ever since we featured Whats-Her-Face. I think he's waited long enough. Let's do him this week. That Game Dude 386 14:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Okay. Seems good. cash money tc 16:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
No, he has not been delayed since we featured What's Her Face, as there was only one editor campaigning to feature Arrow'd Guy then. The fact that that editor didn't get what he wanted does not mean that article has been delayed. It's coming exactly on time: When consensus favours it. I.e., this week. Heimstern Läufer 13:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
What I meant is that, after the time of featuring what's-her-face, the idea of featuring him had been tossed around, but ultimately it was decided he was suited for a later period of time (after featuring The Ugly One, a few weeks after a few issues had been featured, etc.). Perhaps he wasn't delayed for almost a year so much as been taken under consideration for a year, if you want it in politically correct terms, but the point is that there really isn't much sense in putting off a deserving article any longer than it already has. I'm sorry if I came off as sour, Heimstern, but I feel that this article is in dire need of featuring and shouldn't be denied it merely because another TGS-related article had been featured over two months previously. That Game Dude 386 18:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
So far, no one seems to have seriously objected to featuring it this week, despite the relatively short gap between this and the last TGS, so I think we're fine. I'm certainly not going to, since I think TGS is one of the most awesomest things on the site and always like to see more articles about it get featured. Heimstern Läufer 14:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone oppose to French Fries? Espemon333 15:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Well I think we should change this one to next week, and do monosodium this week, so we can better space out the articles. Espemon333 23:39, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 47 (Nov 16-22)

This week, it's time for a cop-out that was responsible for more confusion than almost any toon before it: Sbemailiarized!That Game Dude 386 14:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

While an interesting article, I think it'd be more suitable for April Fools Day, since it was the basis for 2009's April Fool joke. I think we'd need to mention that in the writeup, and that that'd look kind of out-of-place right before Thanksgiving. Heimstern Läufer 14:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
What about one of last week's suggestions: Monosodium Dreams. The Corpy NT6 would work too... LePorello / T / C 15:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
The movie theater? anyone... cash money tc 15:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Monosodium Dreams looks fine to me. The Wheelchair 17:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Sure, I'm game for The Cheat's new computer. But please, let's wait until it's below ten articles in the list before we put up any more in the future, can we? MHarrington 17:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, let's do Monosodium Dreams, and we can save Sbemailiarized! until after March Break. That Game Dude 386 18:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
MONO! Espemon333 01:01, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Ewww. That Game Dude 386 20:52, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 48 (Nov 23-29)

Since it's Thanksgiving week, I suggest the we feature original Thanksgiving toon.... Some Stupid Turkey! The Wheelchair 22:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

It's historic, but it's a bit short; I'm not sure we could get a decent writeup out of it. Heimstern Läufer 23:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Here is a writeup I made for this week's featured article:
Some Stupid Turkey

Some Stupid Turkey is Homestar Runner's first Thanksgiving toon that was released on Tuesday, November 27, 2001. Strong Bad starts this toon with him dressed as a turkey, and begins to sing a Thanksgiving song about a turkey. The song ends with a few of the main characters singing "Go and suck your thumb". Homestar Runner then says to let them go and partake of their wonderous feast, only to find that it was eaten by The King of Town. (more...)


I hope this helps. Also, if this is used, replace the Image placement with a Featured Article template. I didn't use that, as this is not a featured article yet. That'sBupkis! 00:07, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
What about Twenty THANXty Six? I have proposed this for four reasons: 1) Some Stupid Turkey is a tad short, whereas 2008's Thanksgiving toon is a bit longer; 2) It's been a long time since we've done anything related to 20X6; 3) I think we need to do a toon not from 2001 for once; and 4) We usually do Thanksgiving toons from the previous year (i.e., 2005's Fall Float Parade in 2006, 2006's Let Us Give Tanks! in 2007, etc.). MHarrington 03:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
I should point out that the only reason that we've done the previous year's toon for Thanksgiving is only because they have become a regular feature in the last few years. Having said that, though, I have to agree that Some Stupid Turkey is too short, even with the write up, to feature. There's not a whole lot in the T'giving category; the only other ones that haven't been featured are Happy T! and Limozeen Thanksgiving E-cards. Happy T! is also too short, but if we don't do Twenty THANXty Six, the E-cards might be interesting. wbwolf (t | ed) 04:31, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Well, if they keep adding more T'giving toons, maybe we won't have to worry about running out of T'giving articles. Maybe the E-cards could be shown next week? MHarrington 05:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't think we should have two Thanksgiving-themed FAs, especially since we don't have an inexhaustible supply of them. Heimstern Läufer 05:39, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Well, we did have two T'giving-themed FAs last year (the colonization email and Toikey TV), so I don't know. MHarrington 19:50, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
In retrospect, I don't think that was a good idea and that we should have saved one of those for later. Too late now, but I think we'd best not repeat it this year. Heimstern Läufer 03:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Okay, then we won't. It just seemed like a good idea at the time. Anyway, in keeping with how T'giving toons have been articled in the past, I think we should do Twenty THANXty Six this year. MHarrington 05:10, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
I think that's best, too. There's not a lot of Thanksgiving articles, and this one would clearly make a fine writeup. Stupid Turkey could work in a pinch, like, if we run out of T-giving toons sometime (which we could if TBC take the holiday off a few times), but for now I think we should stick with something more substantial. Heimstern Läufer 05:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, SST can wait. I amm quite partial to Horpy Tor! Happy T!, but I am not really sure about the substance. It really Isn't FA material, because there isn't much to be said! Limozeen or THANKSty would work, but THANKSty could be a bit too soon. Espemon333 01:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Actually, it would be carrying on the "tradition" of having the previous year's T'giving toon be articled (i.e., 2005's T'giving toon in 2006, 2006's in 2007 and 2007's in 2008). MHarrington 02:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm gonna have to go with 20-THANKSty-6. cash money tc 17:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 49 (Nov 30-Dec 6)

For this week, let's do one that seems to have gotten a lot of attention: The Movie Theater. MHarrington 18:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Well it does have a good intro and a decent amount of appearances, so it sounds good, but for reasons untold, can simone produce a write up for me? Espemon333 18:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
The movie theater

The movie theater is where movies are watched, sometimes by force. Homestar Runner and Pom Pom brought Coach Z here to watch a film about the word "job" in the toon A Jorb Well Done. Along with that, the theater has also shown films such as Women's Penitentiary Bakesale Nightmare, Fists of Knuckles 1-24, Axe Gun: Legends of the Brain Outener, and Pom Pom's Indie film City (comma) State. As revealed in rated, It is one of the few theaters that show triple R-rated movies. The theater is featured prominently in the email the movies, where it is revealed that Senor Cardgage has a job as the ticket-taker. (more)

Here's my write-up. cash money tc 18:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Well that works for me! Espemon333 18:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
I support this article, but as a side note, it's not necessary to do the write up this far in advance. wbwolf (t | ed) 18:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, but I was just making sure. For reasons. Important reasons. {facedesk, facedesk, facedesk} Espemon333 01:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I just realized that December 6 is the website's 10 birthday! Should we do anything special? Espemon333 01:13, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
homestarrunner.com could work as a website's 10th anniversary FA. I think we should do it only on December 6, and maybe have special decorations on the "This week's/today's featured article." User:Mr Eyeball
Yeah, that sounds great, especially seeing as it is the website's 10th Birthday, and not the body of work's. How would we do it to where it is only 1 day? Espemon333 02:32, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 50 (Dec 7-13)

For this week, we should do another Cheat Commandos character. I'm thinking Silent Rip. MHarrington 16:44, 28 September 2009 (UTC) I myself was thinking that the Taranchula Black Metal Detector would work. The Wheelchair 00:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

First off, I think we are getting WAY too far ahead of ourselves, and second, any particular reason why? Espemon333 01:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Well, it looks like both articles are good, but we haven't done anything Cheat Commandos since I joined the wiki (far as I know) and we did Words I probably said like 2 weeks ago. Silent Rip works for me. Espemon333 01:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
I think it might be better to have homestarrunner.com or Timeline of Homestar Runner as the FA for this week, since the 6th is the 10 year anniversary of the site. I do wonder, given TBC's tendencies to make 10th anniversary toons, if they will do something themselves to note the occasion. wbwolf (t | ed) 04:21, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
But the 6th is last week... Espemon333 22:33, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
And I think that the evolution of the website is too list-like to be articled. MHarrington 06:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 51 (Dec 14-20)

It's Decemberween again! It's here, it's here! The week before is a minor article. This would be a good time to take care of the only remaining larger piece of Decemberween In July, Decemberween Sweet Cuppin' Cakes. wbwolf (t | ed) 01:39, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

That would work, but I think we should do Peanuts. cash money tc 02:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
What about A Holiday Greeting? Although Peanuts would be good, too, since it's been a bit more expanded and would probably make good article fodder. MHarrington 18:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I like the idea of Peanuts since it's heavily referenced for the Decemberween toons, and I don't think we've featured an article that is one of the influences for TBC yet. wbwolf (t | ed) 15:50, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Not true. We've done articles on Nintendo and Atari 2600. MHarrington 18:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't really count the video game articles as an "influence"; stuff like Disney or The Simpsons or Mystery Science Theater 3000, which are more directly related to their style of humor and animation. Video games, while important, are more of a cultural starting point for them. wbwolf (t | ed) 18:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 52 (Dec 21-27)

And in time for Decemberween, why don't we feature a toon that has been overlooked, A Decemberween Pageant. I think that is the last of the "older" D'ween toons that hasn't been featured, and it also provides a lot of the mythology of this holiday 55 days after Halloween. wbwolf (t | ed) 01:39, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

I think The Battle of Strong Badia is a great article. Maybe we should feature that one. MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 21:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
You don't understand. For Decemberween, we feature a Decemberween article. It's a fine article, but pick another week to do it. wbwolf (t | ed) 22:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I didn't notice that that was around Christmas. All right, A Decemberween Pageant sounds just fine. MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 22:08, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 53 (Dec 28-Jan 3)

The Field. A place that appears in probably half the cartoons on the site. Jc iindyysgvxc 05:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

We're getting too far ahead again. I'll keep this one up, but please stay within 10 weeks in the future. Heimstern Läufer 05:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
And it's far too short, still. MHarrington 15:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
I wonder if it might be expandable. It most certainly is too short (prose-wise) at this point, but it's also certainly an important place. It's something to consider, at least. Heimstern Läufer 01:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I think that if we can't get the prose we want from the field, then we should try doing the Dangeresque dailies this week. As mentioned before. Espemon333 00:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't think we should do another set of dailies so soon after the ones we did last week (as of post time). Heimstern Läufer 04:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
I would like to do another set very soon, though. MHarrington 16:12, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Well there IS a 12 week difference... up to concensus though... Espemon333 22:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Well If concensus says no to the dailies and the field, we could do the Battle of Strong Badia. Espemon333 22:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 1 (Jan 4-10)

It's been a while since we've featured a Sweet Cuppin' Cakes character, so this week I vote that we feature an article that I hold very near and dear to me, and my new sunglasses. The Wheelchair! The Wheelchair 23:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I guess we can do The Wheelchair. MHarrington 06:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Since this week is the 6th anniversary of Stinkoman and 20X6, how about something from that universe this week? japanese cartoon, Stinkoman and 1-Up have already been featured. How about the email trading cards in which they are featured for this week instead? It'll be a while since we've done an email, and Trading Cards are an interesting running gag on the site, to boot. wbwolf (t | ed) 16:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
It's actually the 7th anniversary, not the 6th. And Pan Pan, Under Construction and Twenty THANXty Six were featured (at least that last one will be this Thanksgiving), too, though. It's just too bad that they have still not yet completed Stinkoman 20X6 or we could do that, too. Anyway, how about doing Cheatball? That article is long enough, I would think. MHarrington 00:51, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I guess Cheatball could work instead. I wasn't sure at first if it'd be long enough. Another possibility could be 20X6 vs. 1936. Either one would be fine. wbwolf (t | ed) 17:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it should be one where Stinkoman loses, I defiantly, I mean, Definitely vote Cheatball The McArby! 02:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 2 (Jan 11-17)

This week would be Trogdor's birthday, so let's do something like that. I'm thinking The S is for Sucks Dragon. MHarrington 06:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree that it should be Trogdor related, I'd suggest Wormdingler, if we had more to go on, but Wormdingler has showed up only twice, and was only named last trogday, so Ima have to agree on The S is for sucks dragon. although we could take in a bit of a different direction... like maybe Stinkoman related. The McArby! 17:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Yo man, I'm down. I mean, I totally support S Is For Sucks. wbwolf (t | ed) 16:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 3 (Jan 18-24)

Looking Old. Not only is it that email's anniversary, but featuring it this week is a reference to a line from that email. Plus, we haven't yet done any emails from 2005 or 2007, yet we've done at least two emails from every other year. Jc iindyysgvxc 10:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I've been thinking that while we should do emails from 2007, I think we should wait until they do the winter Olympics in February. I got an idea in mind for a set of dailies that follow a common theme. In the meantime, how about doing one of a live person for an article. I'm thinking Jackie Chapman. MHarrington 16:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Would you care to elaborate on your masterdly plan for Olympic emails? As it stands, we don't know why you're not keen on looking old for this week, and of course we all know it's important to explain why you're not going with someone else's suggestion. Heimstern Läufer 00:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Well, in terms of looking old, I was just thinking that we need to do something from 2005 before anything else, and it's been a while since we've done an article on a live person. Besides, what is the reference to the email's line, anyway? As for the Olympics plan, I was thinking of a full week of the references to DNA evidence running gag. I was thinking of doing the six emails (165-170) that reference it and close out the week with the Big Toon. MHarrington 01:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

HRWiki:Featured article for 2010, week 4 (Jan 25-31)

For this week, how about the Strong Bad Email geddup noise? I kinda picked something from 2005, and a bit out of left field, too. MHarrington 17:34, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

General discussion

Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Personal tools