HRWiki:Featured Article Selection

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Teen Girl Squad Issue 13)
(with the notice we can also restore the old text, update notice)
 
(includes 1495 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="background-color: #CCFFCC; border: 1px solid #009900; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em; text-align:center">
 +
'''[[HRWiki:Featured article nominations|Nominations]] for [[HRWiki:featured articles|Featured article]] selection are closed.  This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.'''
 +
</div>
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
{{shortcut|FAS||[[FAS]]}}
-
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]].
+
 
 +
[[Category:HRWiki History|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
 
 +
Welcome to '''[[HRWiki:Featured articles|featured article]] selection'''. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the [[main page]]. For ideas, check out the [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations|featured article nominations]]. For drafts, see [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Drafts|this page]].  
==Checklist==
==Checklist==
-
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true}}
+
{{talkchecklist|Checklist for new Featured Article:|noeditsection=true|inactive=true}}
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*Make sure the article is proof-read up to a high standard.
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
*At 0000 [[Wikipedia:Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]] Monday, [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&action=purge purge the main page cache].
-
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; Unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
+
*[[HRWiki:Protected page|Protect]] and add {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} to the new image; unprotect and remove {{[[Template:mprotected|mprotected]]}} from old image.
-
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; Unprotect the old FA write-up.
+
*Semi-protect the live FA write-up; unprotect the old FA write-up.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Add {{[[Template:featuredarticle|featuredarticle]]}} to FA's talk page.
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured Article Nominations]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_Article_Nominations&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
*Update [[HRWiki:Featured articles]] with descriptive edit summary &mdash; see [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Featured_articles&action=history history].
-
|}<br/>
+
|}<br/>  
==Discussion archives==
==Discussion archives==
-
<center>[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
+
<center>
 +
{| {{standardtable}}
 +
! Year !! Weeks 1-10 !! Weeks 11-20 !! Weeks 21-30 !! Weeks 31-40 !! Weeks 41-52
 +
|-
 +
| 2005
 +
|
 +
|
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 26-29|2005, Weeks 26-29]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 30-39|2005, Weeks 30-39]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2005 Weeks 40-49|2005, Weeks 40-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2006
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10 |2006, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]]  
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2007
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10 |2007, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]  
 +
|-
 +
| 2008
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10 |2008, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2009
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10 |2009, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 31-40|2009, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 41-53|2009, Weeks 41-53]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2010
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 1-10 |2010, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 11-20|2010, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 21-30|2010, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 31-40|2010, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2010 Weeks 41-52|2010, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2011
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 1-10 |2011, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 11-20|2011, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 21-30|2011, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 31-40|2011, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2011 Weeks 41-52|2011, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|-
 +
| 2012
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 1-10 |2012, Weeks 1-10]] 
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 11-20|2012, Weeks 11-20]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 21-30|2012, Weeks 21-30]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 31-40|2012, Weeks 31-40]]
 +
| [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2012 Weeks 41-52|2012, Weeks 41-52]]
 +
|}
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 1-10|2006, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 11-20|2006, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 21-30|2006, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 31-40|2006, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2006 Weeks 41-52|2006, Weeks 41-52]]
 
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 1-10|2007, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 11-20|2007, Weeks 11-20]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 21-30|2007, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 31-40|2007, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2007 Weeks 41-52|2007, Weeks 41-52]]
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/General Discussion|Other Discussion]] |
-
 
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 1|Stalled Discussions Archive 1]] |
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 1-10|2008, Weeks 1-10]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20|2008, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Stalled Discussions Archive 2|Stalled Discussions Archive 2]]
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 21-30|2008, Weeks 21-30]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 31-40|2008, Weeks 31-40]] | [[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 41-52|2008, Weeks 41-52]]
+
-
 
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 1-10|2009, Weeks 1-10]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 11-20|2009, Weeks 11-20]] |
+
-
[[HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2009 Weeks 21-30|2009, Weeks 21-30]]
+
</center>
</center>
-
==Article discussions==
+
==Featured Article Queue==
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 29]] (Jul 13-19)===
+
{| {{standardtable}}
-
For this week, we need to do [[50 emails]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
! Week !! Article !! Discussion
-
:At the time this week comes around, it will have been about 3 months since we've featured an email ([[email thunder]]). It's a good idea, but many other articles that were good that got turned down by ones that were better (even ones that were suggested by you MHarrington) should be thought about for this week (SB's website, Crack Stuntman, etc.) [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue| 3 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 1}}
-
::Then how about [[Crack Stuntman]]? Of course, "50 emails" was once suggested but rejected, too. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 23:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|10 Dec 2012 |2-Part Episode: Part 2}}
-
:::You're right, I forgot. Either one be's fine. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 00:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|17 Dec 2012 |Decemberween in July Dailies|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=Decemberween in July}}
-
::::So let's just do Crack Stuntman now and we'll do "50 emails" next week and Strong Bad's Website the week after. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|24 Dec 2012 |The Last Featured Article|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=A Death-Defying Decemberween}}
-
:::::Looks like we're swapping this and Week 24 now, so [[Crimes Committed by Strong Bad]] is this week's featured article, and Stuntman will be featured 5 weeks ahead of "plan". {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 11:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
+
|}
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 30]] (Jul 20-26)===
+
===Redirects===
-
I think we should try again to do [[50 emails]] this week. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:30, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
+
This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects.  Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA.  When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:
-
:Well, no one's said anything for a while, so I'll go ahead and second it. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
+
<pre>
-
::More like, YOU feature [[50 emails]], ''NERD!'' {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}
 +
</pre>
 +
Example:
 +
<pre>
 +
{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}
 +
</pre>
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 31]] (Jul 27-Aug 2)===
+
Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.
-
As stated from the previous week, we now should feature [[Strong Bad's Website]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:Actually, you stated it the week BEFORE the previous week. [[Seriously]], though, it's a good idea. [[User:Theycallmefree|Theycallmefree]] 20:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 32]] (Aug 3-9)===
+
==Article discussions==
-
For this week, I was thinking of the [[Double Deuce]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 04:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:How about [[Doughnuts]]? It's had quite a bit of references, but the intro needs quite a bit of expansion. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 14:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::The intro is far too short, nor do I think that it could be expanded beyond what it has.  We're looking for toons, characters or major themes of the site.  While Doughnuts show up in a lot of unusual ways, I don't think it makes a good FA. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Oh! I have a better one!  [[First Time Here?]] is extremely important toon and gets constantly overlooked.  It should be featured. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::[[First Time Here?]] seems like a good article. It's also VERY funny. "Homestarrunner.net:Its Dot Com!" Never gets old. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 20:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::And also, "Check me out! No, seriously, check me out." [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 22:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 33]] (Aug 10-16)===
+
== Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion ==
-
I still can't believe that [[G]] hasn't been featured yet. It's like, a healthy piece of real estate! --{{User:Darkangel/sig}} 05:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.''
-
:The big problem with the G article is it has very little prose and is mostly a list.  It's a great theme, but it's not what a FA makes. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 05:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::Yeah, and I'm not sure one could really expand it to the point it would be a good FA, though I'd be perfectly happy for someone to prove me wrong on that point. Unless and until someone does so, though, it's not a good choice. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 14:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Well, since it's being debated whether or not to do [[First Time Here]] for week 32, how about doing the article originally intended: the [[Double Deuce]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::::Since I upstaged the suggestion for Double D, I'll second featuring [[Double Deuce]] for this week.  Great theme, and a lot of text for an intro. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 23:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::::Well, I...one...two...Fifth it! For reasons stated above and beyond! Take it away, sig: {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 00:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 34]] (Aug 17-23)===
+
==Stalled Discussions==
-
For this week, how about [[General Tso's Chicken]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 20:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
+
:''Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time. ''
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 35]] (Aug 24-30)===
+
==General discussion==
-
For this week, I was thinking of something befitting the return to school: [[L.U.R.N.]], Marzipan's cult... er, classroom. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 17:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:'''WHAT?!?!?''' WE'RE ALREADY PICKING BACK TO SCHOOL ARTICLES!?!? AHHHHHHHHHHHH! Erm, seems good to me. Back to school... ugh... {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 17:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
+
-
::My main concern with the LURN article is that while it has a lot of great prose, there isn't that much there past the intro.  FAs should be a balance of strong intro with material beyond that.  I'm not sure this would fit.  How about the [[The Classroom]] instead? {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
+
-
:::Sure, that'd be good, too. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 19:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
+
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 36]] (Aug 31-Sep 6)===
 
-
For this week, we need to do something Old-Timey-related. I'm torn between either [[Old-Timey Marzipan]] or the big toon [[Parsnips A-Plenty]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 06:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:Well, we're doing [[A Folky Tale]] right now, so I don't really want to do Parsnips-a-Plenty. Old-Timey Marzipan seems decent, but I want to do [[Words I Probably Said]] sometime. It's amazing, I think. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 15:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::Well, then let's do [[Old-Timey Marzipan]] this week, and [[Words I Probably Said]] next week. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 18:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 37]] (Sep 7-13)===
 
-
For this week, we should do what was previously suggested earlier: [[Words I Probably Said]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 21:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:I just looked at it and it looks solid.  I agree. {{User:Open Source Greg/sig}} 10:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 38]] (Sep 14-20)===
 
-
[[Homestar Runner and Homestar Runner's Relationship]]. "homestar = you" = pure genius. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 19:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:Excellent article if we can just expand that prose intro severalfold. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 19:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::''"...which means it showcases an important part of the Homestar Runner body of work and/or highlights the fine work of this wiki."'' This definitely is an important part of the Homestar Runner , but it may not be a highlight of the wiki. Yes, the intro needs fixing, but I think Character Relationships are the future of FAs. Now if I only knew what severalfold means... {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 19:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:::Sorry, but the article is ''far'' too short to merit a Featured Article. Might I suggest something that has never been done yet this year: a full week of themes. This time, I was thinking of a whole week of emails involving the infamous [[DNA Evidence|DNA evidence]] and the big toon [[DNA Evidence (toon)|DNA Evidence]]. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 03:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::::MHarrington, you're much too quick to dismiss others' ideas out of hand instead of trying to suggest ways to improve them. Instead, you have a tendency to immediately stick in your own ideas. That's just plain bad form.
 
-
::::As I've already said, HR-self does have exactly the type of content that would be great as an FA, but its intro is not nearly ready. There's still a lot of time; it might be something we can improve before the time of featuring. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:::::Well, I did say I was sorry. But I wasn't trying to be dismissive of others' ideas. I just don't know how it can be expanded. It's an integral part of the website experience, to be sure, but how can we possibly expand the article so that it actually can be usable? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 15:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::::::I'd start by summarizing the content of the article in greater detail, similar to Wikipedia's guidelines on [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Lead section|lead sections]]. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::Well, obviously, the article needs to go into greater detail, but my question is, how? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 16:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::::::::How about [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Homestar_Runner_and_Homestar_Runner%27s_Relationship&curid=31487&diff=661949&oldid=651058&rcid=621404 something like this?]  Oh, and I fully support this article. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:::::::::Well, it's good to start with. But I think it might need to be a bit longer. [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 04:42, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
:::::''"We also might just think it's cool."'' The concept behind the article is brilliant and fascinating, and certainly cool enough to be featured. By all means, expand the intro if you think it needs it. It's the overall idea that is so appealing to me. &mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 12:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
::::::''That it is''. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 12:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2009, week 39]] (Sep 21-27)===
 
-
How about [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 13]] for this week? {{User:Bubs 20X6/sig}} 05:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 
-
 
-
==General discussion==
 
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
===Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)===
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:
In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

Current revision as of 19:02, 9 January 2013

Nominations for Featured article selection are closed. This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here.

Shortcuts:
HRW:FAS
FAS

Welcome to featured article selection. Please help us choose and create write-ups for our best, most interesting, or otherwise noteworthy articles to appear on the main page. For ideas, check out the featured article nominations. For drafts, see this page.

Contents

[edit] Checklist

Checklist for new Featured Article:(INACTIVE)

[edit] Discussion archives

Year Weeks 1-10 Weeks 11-20 Weeks 21-30 Weeks 31-40 Weeks 41-52
2005 2005, Weeks 26-29 2005, Weeks 30-39 2005, Weeks 40-52
2006 2006, Weeks 1-10 2006, Weeks 11-20 2006, Weeks 21-30 2006, Weeks 31-40 2006, Weeks 41-52
2007 2007, Weeks 1-10 2007, Weeks 11-20 2007, Weeks 21-30 2007, Weeks 31-40 2007, Weeks 41-52
2008 2008, Weeks 1-10 2008, Weeks 11-20 2008, Weeks 21-30 2008, Weeks 31-40 2008, Weeks 41-52
2009 2009, Weeks 1-10 2009, Weeks 11-20 2009, Weeks 21-30 2009, Weeks 31-40 2009, Weeks 41-53
2010 2010, Weeks 1-10 2010, Weeks 11-20 2010, Weeks 21-30 2010, Weeks 31-40 2010, Weeks 41-52
2011 2011, Weeks 1-10 2011, Weeks 11-20 2011, Weeks 21-30 2011, Weeks 31-40 2011, Weeks 41-52
2012 2012, Weeks 1-10 2012, Weeks 11-20 2012, Weeks 21-30 2012, Weeks 31-40 2012, Weeks 41-52


Other Discussion | Stalled Discussions Archive 1 | Stalled Discussions Archive 2

[edit] Featured Article Queue

Week Article Discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 49 (Dec 3–9) 2-Part Episode: Part 1 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 50 (Dec 10–16) 2-Part Episode: Part 2 discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 51 (Dec 17–23) Decemberween in July Dailies - Decemberween in July discussion
HRWiki:Featured article for 2012, week 52 (Dec 24–30) The Last Featured Article - A Death-Defying Decemberween discussion

[edit] Redirects

This is a placeholder topic for 5-year redirects. Due to overall decreased activity, FAs are now being reused more often. The common practice has become to redirect to the FA exactly 5 years prior to the current FA. When an article is re-used, mark it in the following manner:

{{FA queue|<date>|Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=<article name>}}

Example:

{{FA queue|15 Aug 2011 |Redirects|alternatediscussion=yes|decision=1-Up}}

Please keep this discussion in the FA page at all times, but do copy it to archive pages as well.

[edit] Article discussions

[edit] Discussions of Articles Needing Expansion

Discussions in this section regard articles that, per consensus, require further expansion of the article itself before the article should be featured.

[edit] Stalled Discussions

Discussions in this section regard articles that, due to lack of consensus or consensus against, are not ready to be featured at this time.

[edit] General discussion

[edit] Daily Featured Blocks (On Occasion)

In order to make daily featured articles for one week, create pages like:

  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 1]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 2]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 3]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 4]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 5]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 6]]
  • [[HRWiki:Featured article for 2005, week 50, day 0]] (redirect day 7 to this)
Personal tools