<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.hrwiki.org/w/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Homestar Runner Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Scanna</link>
		<description>From Homestar Runner Wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.4</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 01:03:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>Strong Bad's Mount RidesPlace! USA</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Strong_Bad%27s_Mount_RidesPlace!_USA</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Attractions */  sp - nothing imortant, really&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:themepark.png|thumb|&amp;quot;More rides than you or your grandmother can handle.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Strong Bad's Mount RidesPlace! USA''' is an [[Made-Up Places|imaginary theme park]] that [[Strong Bad]] fabricated in the email [[theme park]]. Although the park's motto is &amp;quot;More Rides Than You Or Your Grandmother Can Handle&amp;quot;, the fine print requests that grandmothers not actually be brought to the park. Mount Ridesplace appears to be located [[behind the fence]] in [[Strong Badia]] and features many rides as well as the antics of the [[#Mascots|Mount RidesPlace! USA Mascots]]. Because this theme-park-to-be is very expensive, Strong Bad needs to &amp;quot;start robbing WAY more hot actresses&amp;quot; than he is currently stealing from in order to make his dream a reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Attractions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are all the known attractions in Mount RidesPlace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Bowels of Trogdor''' &amp;amp;mdash; The flagship roller coaster. It keeps spinning you around in circles until you either [[Puking|throw up]] or catch [[fire]] somehow. [[The King of Town]] was shown riding this. Unfortunately for those such as The Cheat, you have to be &amp;quot;as tall as [[Trogdor]]'s [[beefy arm]]&amp;quot; to ride. &lt;br /&gt;
*'''The Strong Sad Gets Decked Repeatedly Stunt SPOOK-tacular''' &amp;amp;mdash; In this show, [[Strong Sad]] stands on a stage dressed as a witch while [[Strong Mad]] tackles him repeatedly without mercy.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Throw Game''' &amp;amp;mdash; In [[Bubs]]' throw game, you have to get the blue rings ''in'' the bottles, not looped around them, as is at the very least, a possible feat. If you win, you get a [[Shark-Tooth Bubs|Bubs doll with a horn]]. [[Pom Pom]] has had the displeasure of playing this game, only to find out the impossible rules.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''[[Sweet Cuppin' Cakes]] Land''' &amp;amp;mdash; [[The Cheat]] is directed here because he's not tall enough to ride the &amp;quot;Bowels of Trogdor&amp;quot;. Sweet Cuppin' Cakes Land may or may not be a separate theme park. According to the commentary for the email [[theme park]] , Sweet Cuppin' Cakes Land was going to have spinning [[Eh! Steve!]] as a ride.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Bowels of Trogdor.PNG|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Bowels of Trogdor&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Strong Sad Gets Decked.PNG|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;The Strong Sad Gets Decked Repeatedly Stunt SPOOK-tacular&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Throw Game.PNG|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Throw Game&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mascots==&lt;br /&gt;
The costumed mascots that run around &amp;quot;antic-ing&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;antique-ing&amp;quot; in Mount RidesPlace! USA.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Image:stoppy_sign.PNG|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Stoppy&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Image:poppy_tire.PNG|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Poppy&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Image:ryans.png|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;General Tso's Chicken/Ryan S.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Stoppy the Sign''', played by [[Coach Z]], is the [[Stop Sign]] mascot. Although the costume chafes him, he doesn't mind a good chafe.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Poppy the Tire''' is a mascot representing the [[Tire]]. The suit chafes [[Homestar Runner]] like crazy.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''[[General Tso's Chicken]]''' appears in mascot form in Strong Bad's Mount RidesPlace USA. Also known as &amp;quot;[[Ryan Sterritt|Ryan S.]]&amp;quot;, this character is portrayed by [[Homsar]]. He doesn't even notice the chafe, and claims that &amp;quot;it's time for tasteball.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Riverquest Safariventure==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:riverquest.PNG|200px|thumb|It's a falling rock!]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until he gets his full funding, Strong Bad makes ends meet with the &amp;quot;Strong Badian Riverquest Safariventure&amp;quot;. The Cheat is another tour-guide on the Safariventure. Some of the &amp;quot;dangers&amp;quot; found on the ride include a falling rock and a headhunter (played by the wooden cutout of a [[Bear holding a Shark]]). [[Homestar Runner]] says it is the [[Best/Worst X bucks I ever spent|&amp;quot;worst $3,000 I ever spent&amp;quot;]].&lt;br /&gt;
He seems to have given up on this enterprise, however, as the &amp;quot;boat&amp;quot; was later sold at his [[garage sale]] for $1.04.  He eventually put the ride back into business, as seen in [[specially marked]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Places]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mascots]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Strong Badia|Mount RidesPlace USA]]&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 05:19:22 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Strong_Bad%27s_Mount_RidesPlace!_USA</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Strong Bad Robot</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Strong_Bad_Robot</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Food logo */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Hyphenate? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be called &amp;quot;Grape-Nuts Robot&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;Grape Nuts Robot&amp;quot;?  The hyphen is visible on the front and top of the robot. --[[User:71.244.175.158|71.244.175.158]] 14:49, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're right, 71. According to [http://www.kraft.com/100/innovations/grapenuts.html this], there's definitely a hyphen. Good catch. &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:03, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ceral? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the third line of the ingredients list, it says &amp;quot;more ceral&amp;quot;.  Is that our typo, or TBC's?  Could someone who knows how to decompile flash check it?  If it's TBC's mistake, we should insert a &amp;quot;[sic]&amp;quot; or a note explaining that we've faithfully copied it.--[[User:Bobo the King|Bobo the King]] 04:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's either TBC's mistake or TBC's purposeful mispelling, as zooming into the flash file says &amp;quot;ceral&amp;quot;. {{User:Dr._Clash/sig}} 04:42, 3 March 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Food logo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else see a similarity to the Ford logo? Is this worth putting in the article? [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 02:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 02:40:21 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Strong_Bad_Robot</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Strong Bad Robot</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Strong_Bad_Robot</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/**/Food logo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Hyphenate? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be called &amp;quot;Grape-Nuts Robot&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;Grape Nuts Robot&amp;quot;?  The hyphen is visible on the front and top of the robot. --[[User:71.244.175.158|71.244.175.158]] 14:49, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're right, 71. According to [http://www.kraft.com/100/innovations/grapenuts.html this], there's definitely a hyphen. Good catch. &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 15:03, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ceral? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the third line of the ingredients list, it says &amp;quot;more ceral&amp;quot;.  Is that our typo, or TBC's?  Could someone who knows how to decompile flash check it?  If it's TBC's mistake, we should insert a &amp;quot;[sic]&amp;quot; or a note explaining that we've faithfully copied it.--[[User:Bobo the King|Bobo the King]] 04:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's either TBC's mistake or TBC's purposeful mispelling, as zooming into the flash file says &amp;quot;ceral&amp;quot;. {{User:Dr._Clash/sig}} 04:42, 3 March 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Food logo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else see a similarity to the Ford logo? Is this worth putting in the article?&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 02:40:04 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Strong_Bad_Robot</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>User:Scanna</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User:Scanna</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Stuff that needs done by me or you */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Scanna is a Wiki migrant with waaay too much time on his hands, who still somehow manages to be congenitally lazy. He'll make himself a page later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stuff that needs done by me or you==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope, we got notin'. Engage default patterns.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 02:34:41 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Scanna</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Allegedly Real Things</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Better Commando Name */  - backslapping abounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Deletion? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone explain where the scope of this page is in any way different from the scope of [[Blatant Lies]]? It just doesn't seem like there are two running gags happening here. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 02:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's more specific than &amp;quot;Blatant lies&amp;quot;. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Right, but Ryan S. is more specific than Mount Ridesplace Mascots, yet doesn't warrant its own page on the wiki. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sheesh, can he develop the page a little before you slap a tbd on it? &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I disagree that we can't talk in the abstract about the benefits of having a discussion on the scope. I mean, I would much rather allow this discussion to happen ''before'' someone invests their time into developing this and finding every instance of it. I actually find absolutely no issue in an abstract discussion, and frankly would prefer discussing the ''Merits'' of a page instead of the ''Content'' of a page. Content can always be expanded on, but there Merits of this scope exist the same today as they would a year from now. The merits won't change over time. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Without all the content, the merits of the topic are generally not clear. At any rate, it's common courtesy not to just tag articles by established users without giving them a chance to make a case for their article. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This seems like a running gag to me... I was noticing a trend of this sort of thing, myself. Incidentally, how about the fake &amp;quot;error messages&amp;quot; that say &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; on them? (I think in [[50 emails]], [[The System is Down]], and &amp;quot;Not the 100th E-mail!!&amp;quot; (can't remember the exact name, so I didn't put a link), but I could be mistaken...) -{{User:YK/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ha. Looks like Jay had the idea at the same time I did. =P -{{User:YK/sig}} 03:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Okay. Now that the page have a little more content, I don't ''really'' don't understand what this page is about. It lacks from several problems:&lt;br /&gt;
#The name suggests that that we are discussing real objects, but this article is about made-up objects. And also, so of the &amp;quot;objects&amp;quot; are really abstract, like a girlfriend. Tell any women that she is an object, let's see where that gets you.&lt;br /&gt;
#The scope of this article is poorly defined. I went over the examples and over [[blatant lies]], and while I see what the creator meant to do in this article, most of these items aren't related. Like Coach Z inviting &amp;quot;all kinds of real people over to [his] house for a coupla real people parties.&amp;quot; and Homestar making a &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; message. One is a lie told out of shame, the other is note.&lt;br /&gt;
#I had a three, but I think I merged that point with #1 or #2... either way this page needs either a major cleanup, a better definition, and name change and some trimming. And all that if it doesn't just get merged with [[blatant lies]], like I think it should be as it is now. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with some of this, particularly that the current name isn't exactly spot-on.  Maybe something more like [[&amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; Things]]? -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]] 06:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not opposed to a name change. Anyway, the gag here is that the characters ''refer'' as the thing they're lying about as being &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; - not just that they ''treat'' it that way. Thus, both examples noted (Coach Z invites &amp;quot;'''real''' people&amp;quot; to his &amp;quot;'''real''' people parties&amp;quot; and Homestar produces a &amp;quot;This is '''real'''&amp;quot; error message) fit perfectly. Was that unclear? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 06:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then let's use &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; in the title. '''Really 'Real' Items''' perhaps? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 08:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But I think there is a major difference between the two cases. Homestar was trying to cover up the fact the he made a flagrant error, and Coach Z was just plain-old creepy. The only connection is the world &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but the examples are inherently different. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 11:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: This page isn't documenting the INTENT of the lie - only that they're lying and awkwardly inserting the word &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; (/&amp;quot;actual&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;) as part of the lie. The only connection between them may be the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but as it happens, that's what the page is about in the first place. BTW, I looked over the page and, contrary to my own expectations, &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; is used far more than &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot;, so perhaps a page name with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would be better. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: For reference, this page is meant to be like [[Not X]] - notice, there, that the &amp;quot;Not MS Paint&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Strong Bad Emails: 1, Not Strong Bad Emails: 0&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the first thing I do is NOT drop a piano on Marzipan's head&amp;quot; gags have little to nothing in common outside of the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;. But since the page is ABOUT the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;, including all three examples is justified. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Better Commando Name ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to my initial impulse, &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot; is fairly rare in this running gag, so a title with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would probably be better. But there is some confusion over the scope of the article, so even with that in mind, a better commando name may be in order. Thoughts? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe 'Real' Objects? Highlights the questionable-at-best nature of these allegations. [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 05:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's more about the fact that these aren't all objects... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::True. 'Real' Things? [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 06:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here's an unwieldy long suggestion I could think of: '''Made-up objects referred to as real'''... That's all I got. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 07:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, it's accurate at least....[[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 08:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I reiterate a past suggestion: '''Really 'Real' Items'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 09:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Ooo, I like that. We need to pick one quickly, though; this is still an orphaned page, and really needs some linky lovin', which is pointless until we get a decent name [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 23:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::&amp;quot;Really 'Real' Items&amp;quot; seem like an ironic title. It doesn't say that the items are not real when taken at face value. I don't think that irony is the best way to handle an article's title. Another point: Don't be afraid to choose long article names. If nothing better comes along, then it's okay to have a long title. Just recently an article was moved with [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=move&amp;amp;user=&amp;amp;page=Derailed+Emails such a title]. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 07:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Okay, I'll give it another few days, but unless any new suggestions are feilded, I'm gonig to be bold and change this to one of the previous two suggestions. [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 01:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::'''Real World Objects'''? We have Real-World References and people understand what that means. Maybe they'd understand Real World ''Objects''! {{User:DevonM/sig}} 01:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;resetting indents&amp;gt; I don't know if it matters at this point, but what about '''Obviously Fake People and Objects'''? -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 01:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about '''This is real''' ?  {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 14:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::How bou... I say anything with quotes around ''''Real'''' like that.  That way it is saying that the objects are not actually real. Kinda like what Scanna put. --{{User:Theyellowdart/sig}} 15:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I like Qoimac's one, actually.  I don't see a huge problem with the ironic title.  Like TYD says, the quotes make the meaning apparent enough, imo. -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't think DevonM's or Brightstar's would work. It needs to be either specific (see E.L.'s) or notably ironic (see Qermaq's or possibly Optimistic's); remember that the gag is about the insistence that the object is real, not just being a fake object. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 16:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'm convinced that '''This is real''' is the best title. It includes the word ''real'', it doesn't require quotation marks to prove that we're talking about things that aren't real, it's been used for more than one instance of the gag and all the other instances can easily go along with it with a brief explanation in the intro paragraph. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 16:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::But it's not very descriptive as an article title. -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]] 17:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I was rather surprised to find that this article wasn't about objects in the physical world, like, say, objects in Puppet Stuff - an article on things that characters claimed to be real but weren't was surprising to me. Something like &amp;quot;Real objects&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Real things&amp;quot; would have the same problem. Similarly, something like &amp;quot;Really 'Real' Items&amp;quot; would sound like a page of items that had been called &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; and, indeed, are real, not ones that turned out not to be. How about, hrm, '''Allegedly 'Real' Things'''? I don't like that terribly much, but it's all I can come up with now. -- [[User:Mithent|Mithent]] 17:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I think the article title needs to be able to summarize what the article is about all by itself. So, '''This is real''' doesn't work for me, and '''Obviously Fake People and Objects''' and '''Real World Objects''' don't quite capture the essence of the article. Something like '''Really &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; Items''' does a bit of a better job &amp;amp;mdash; the title claims that these are real objects, but the quotation marks indicate that they're not actually real. But I think that the clearest suggestion so far is E.L. Cool's: '''Made-up objects referred to as real''' &amp;amp;mdash; it's long, but I can deal with that. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Edit: Mithent's suggestion wasn't there when I started posting the above thoughts, but I actually like that suggestion. I don't even think we need the quotation marks: '''Allegedly Real Things''' captures the essential fact they aren't real. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Yeah, finally another decent suggestion.  I like '''Allegedly Real Things''' (and without the qutoation marks is better).  And if not Allegedly, maybe Supposedly.  Either one, really.  They both fit.  {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 17:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I'd be satisfied with &amp;quot;Allegedly Real Things.&amp;quot; -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]] 17:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::Yeah, &amp;quot;Allegedly Real Things&amp;quot; fits wonderfully. Nice work, The Mithent! --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Frankly, '''Allegedly Real Things''' is E.L. Cool's idea minus 4 (or 3) words. It works for me. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 19:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::It is, pretty much.. but it's a wiki, it's collaborative :) I like it better without the quotes, yes. -- [[User:Mithent|Mithent]] 20:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::Ooh, yeah.  I like that one. Allegedly Real Things.  Yep. You nailed it. --{{User:Theyellowdart/sig}} 20:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::Careful with the compliments, Darty. You don't want his head to get too big, lest it crack through the ceiling like that one Air Heads commercial! -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 20:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::OH, there we go! Good work, juys! [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 02:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 02:34:01 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Allegedly Real Things</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Better Commando Name */ - threat of action! Much fun having!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Deletion? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone explain where the scope of this page is in any way different from the scope of [[Blatant Lies]]? It just doesn't seem like there are two running gags happening here. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 02:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's more specific than &amp;quot;Blatant lies&amp;quot;. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Right, but Ryan S. is more specific than Mount Ridesplace Mascots, yet doesn't warrant its own page on the wiki. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sheesh, can he develop the page a little before you slap a tbd on it? &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I disagree that we can't talk in the abstract about the benefits of having a discussion on the scope. I mean, I would much rather allow this discussion to happen ''before'' someone invests their time into developing this and finding every instance of it. I actually find absolutely no issue in an abstract discussion, and frankly would prefer discussing the ''Merits'' of a page instead of the ''Content'' of a page. Content can always be expanded on, but there Merits of this scope exist the same today as they would a year from now. The merits won't change over time. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Without all the content, the merits of the topic are generally not clear. At any rate, it's common courtesy not to just tag articles by established users without giving them a chance to make a case for their article. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This seems like a running gag to me... I was noticing a trend of this sort of thing, myself. Incidentally, how about the fake &amp;quot;error messages&amp;quot; that say &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; on them? (I think in [[50 emails]], [[The System is Down]], and &amp;quot;Not the 100th E-mail!!&amp;quot; (can't remember the exact name, so I didn't put a link), but I could be mistaken...) -{{User:YK/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ha. Looks like Jay had the idea at the same time I did. =P -{{User:YK/sig}} 03:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Okay. Now that the page have a little more content, I don't ''really'' don't understand what this page is about. It lacks from several problems:&lt;br /&gt;
#The name suggests that that we are discussing real objects, but this article is about made-up objects. And also, so of the &amp;quot;objects&amp;quot; are really abstract, like a girlfriend. Tell any women that she is an object, let's see where that gets you.&lt;br /&gt;
#The scope of this article is poorly defined. I went over the examples and over [[blatant lies]], and while I see what the creator meant to do in this article, most of these items aren't related. Like Coach Z inviting &amp;quot;all kinds of real people over to [his] house for a coupla real people parties.&amp;quot; and Homestar making a &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; message. One is a lie told out of shame, the other is note.&lt;br /&gt;
#I had a three, but I think I merged that point with #1 or #2... either way this page needs either a major cleanup, a better definition, and name change and some trimming. And all that if it doesn't just get merged with [[blatant lies]], like I think it should be as it is now. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with some of this, particularly that the current name isn't exactly spot-on.  Maybe something more like [[&amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; Things]]? -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]] 06:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not opposed to a name change. Anyway, the gag here is that the characters ''refer'' as the thing they're lying about as being &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; - not just that they ''treat'' it that way. Thus, both examples noted (Coach Z invites &amp;quot;'''real''' people&amp;quot; to his &amp;quot;'''real''' people parties&amp;quot; and Homestar produces a &amp;quot;This is '''real'''&amp;quot; error message) fit perfectly. Was that unclear? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 06:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then let's use &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; in the title. '''Really 'Real' Items''' perhaps? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 08:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But I think there is a major difference between the two cases. Homestar was trying to cover up the fact the he made a flagrant error, and Coach Z was just plain-old creepy. The only connection is the world &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but the examples are inherently different. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 11:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: This page isn't documenting the INTENT of the lie - only that they're lying and awkwardly inserting the word &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; (/&amp;quot;actual&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;) as part of the lie. The only connection between them may be the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but as it happens, that's what the page is about in the first place. BTW, I looked over the page and, contrary to my own expectations, &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; is used far more than &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot;, so perhaps a page name with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would be better. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: For reference, this page is meant to be like [[Not X]] - notice, there, that the &amp;quot;Not MS Paint&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Strong Bad Emails: 1, Not Strong Bad Emails: 0&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the first thing I do is NOT drop a piano on Marzipan's head&amp;quot; gags have little to nothing in common outside of the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;. But since the page is ABOUT the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;, including all three examples is justified. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Better Commando Name ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to my initial impulse, &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot; is fairly rare in this running gag, so a title with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would probably be better. But there is some confusion over the scope of the article, so even with that in mind, a better commando name may be in order. Thoughts? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe 'Real' Objects? Highlights the questionable-at-best nature of these allegations. [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 05:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's more about the fact that these aren't all objects... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::True. 'Real' Things? [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 06:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here's an unwieldy long suggestion I could think of: '''Made-up objects referred to as real'''... That's all I got. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 07:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, it's accurate at least....[[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 08:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I reiterate a past suggestion: '''Really 'Real' Items'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 09:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Ooo, I like that. We need to pick one quickly, though; this is still an orphaned page, and really needs some linky lovin', which is pointless until we get a decent name [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 23:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::&amp;quot;Really 'Real' Items&amp;quot; seem like an ironic title. It doesn't say that the items are not real when taken at face value. I don't think that irony is the best way to handle an article's title. Another point: Don't be afraid to choose long article names. If nothing better comes along, then it's okay to have a long title. Just recently an article was moved with [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=move&amp;amp;user=&amp;amp;page=Derailed+Emails such a title]. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 07:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Okay, I'll give it another few days, but unless any new suggestions are feilded, I'm gonig to be bold and change this to one of the previous two suggestions. [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 01:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:49:39 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>User:Scanna</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User:Scanna</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;new stuff to do section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Scanna is a Wiki migrant with waaay too much time on his hands, who still somehow manages to be congenitally lazy. He'll make himself a page later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stuff that needs done by me or you==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
KoT Toon has no running time. Investigate.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:52:40 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Scanna</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Kertified Klown Kare</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Kertified_Klown_Kare</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Racism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't this a little racist, because if you abbreviate it, you know...&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sure it's nothing more than coincidence. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think it's a coincidence, but I highly doubt TBC mean anything sinister by it. &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I mean, they probably didn't notice that it could be interpreted in that way when they made it. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This simply plays on how in the 50s and thenabouts people used to use k's for c's to be &amp;quot;kool&amp;quot;. This takes it a bit further with the &amp;quot;kertified&amp;quot;, but the fact that the initialism happens to be KKK is surely a coincidence, not a reference intended by TBC. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Agreed.Even if they were aware the liklihood of them putting in content this extreme with a straight face when the site reflects very little in the way of politics, serious real world issues etc. seems low. It's a family webbsite, ultimately [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 02:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 02:32:19 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Kertified_Klown_Kare</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Allegedly Real Things</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Better Commando Name */ - urgency&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Deletion? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone explain where the scope of this page is in any way different from the scope of [[Blatant Lies]]? It just doesn't seem like there are two running gags happening here. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 02:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's more specific than &amp;quot;Blatant lies&amp;quot;. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Right, but Ryan S. is more specific than Mount Ridesplace Mascots, yet doesn't warrant its own page on the wiki. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sheesh, can he develop the page a little before you slap a tbd on it? &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I disagree that we can't talk in the abstract about the benefits of having a discussion on the scope. I mean, I would much rather allow this discussion to happen ''before'' someone invests their time into developing this and finding every instance of it. I actually find absolutely no issue in an abstract discussion, and frankly would prefer discussing the ''Merits'' of a page instead of the ''Content'' of a page. Content can always be expanded on, but there Merits of this scope exist the same today as they would a year from now. The merits won't change over time. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Without all the content, the merits of the topic are generally not clear. At any rate, it's common courtesy not to just tag articles by established users without giving them a chance to make a case for their article. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This seems like a running gag to me... I was noticing a trend of this sort of thing, myself. Incidentally, how about the fake &amp;quot;error messages&amp;quot; that say &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; on them? (I think in [[50 emails]], [[The System is Down]], and &amp;quot;Not the 100th E-mail!!&amp;quot; (can't remember the exact name, so I didn't put a link), but I could be mistaken...) -{{User:YK/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ha. Looks like Jay had the idea at the same time I did. =P -{{User:YK/sig}} 03:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Okay. Now that the page have a little more content, I don't ''really'' don't understand what this page is about. It lacks from several problems:&lt;br /&gt;
#The name suggests that that we are discussing real objects, but this article is about made-up objects. And also, so of the &amp;quot;objects&amp;quot; are really abstract, like a girlfriend. Tell any women that she is an object, let's see where that gets you.&lt;br /&gt;
#The scope of this article is poorly defined. I went over the examples and over [[blatant lies]], and while I see what the creator meant to do in this article, most of these items aren't related. Like Coach Z inviting &amp;quot;all kinds of real people over to [his] house for a coupla real people parties.&amp;quot; and Homestar making a &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; message. One is a lie told out of shame, the other is note.&lt;br /&gt;
#I had a three, but I think I merged that point with #1 or #2... either way this page needs either a major cleanup, a better definition, and name change and some trimming. And all that if it doesn't just get merged with [[blatant lies]], like I think it should be as it is now. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with some of this, particularly that the current name isn't exactly spot-on.  Maybe something more like [[&amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; Things]]? -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]] 06:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not opposed to a name change. Anyway, the gag here is that the characters ''refer'' as the thing they're lying about as being &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; - not just that they ''treat'' it that way. Thus, both examples noted (Coach Z invites &amp;quot;'''real''' people&amp;quot; to his &amp;quot;'''real''' people parties&amp;quot; and Homestar produces a &amp;quot;This is '''real'''&amp;quot; error message) fit perfectly. Was that unclear? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 06:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then let's use &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; in the title. '''Really 'Real' Items''' perhaps? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 08:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But I think there is a major difference between the two cases. Homestar was trying to cover up the fact the he made a flagrant error, and Coach Z was just plain-old creepy. The only connection is the world &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but the examples are inherently different. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 11:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: This page isn't documenting the INTENT of the lie - only that they're lying and awkwardly inserting the word &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; (/&amp;quot;actual&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;) as part of the lie. The only connection between them may be the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but as it happens, that's what the page is about in the first place. BTW, I looked over the page and, contrary to my own expectations, &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; is used far more than &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot;, so perhaps a page name with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would be better. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: For reference, this page is meant to be like [[Not X]] - notice, there, that the &amp;quot;Not MS Paint&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Strong Bad Emails: 1, Not Strong Bad Emails: 0&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the first thing I do is NOT drop a piano on Marzipan's head&amp;quot; gags have little to nothing in common outside of the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;. But since the page is ABOUT the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;, including all three examples is justified. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Better Commando Name ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to my initial impulse, &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot; is fairly rare in this running gag, so a title with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would probably be better. But there is some confusion over the scope of the article, so even with that in mind, a better commando name may be in order. Thoughts? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe 'Real' Objects? Highlights the questionable-at-best nature of these allegations. [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 05:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's more about the fact that these aren't all objects... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::True. 'Real' Things? [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 06:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here's an unwieldy long suggestion I could think of: '''Made-up objects referred to as real'''... That's all I got. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 07:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, it's accurate at least....[[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 08:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I reiterate a past suggestion: '''Really 'Real' Items'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 09:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Ooo, I like that. We need to pick one quickly, though; this is still an orphaned page, and really needs some linky lovin', which is pointless until we get a decent name [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 23:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:37:35 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Allegedly Real Things</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Deletion? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone explain where the scope of this page is in any way different from the scope of [[Blatant Lies]]? It just doesn't seem like there are two running gags happening here. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 02:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's more specific than &amp;quot;Blatant lies&amp;quot;. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Right, but Ryan S. is more specific than Mount Ridesplace Mascots, yet doesn't warrant its own page on the wiki. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sheesh, can he develop the page a little before you slap a tbd on it? &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I disagree that we can't talk in the abstract about the benefits of having a discussion on the scope. I mean, I would much rather allow this discussion to happen ''before'' someone invests their time into developing this and finding every instance of it. I actually find absolutely no issue in an abstract discussion, and frankly would prefer discussing the ''Merits'' of a page instead of the ''Content'' of a page. Content can always be expanded on, but there Merits of this scope exist the same today as they would a year from now. The merits won't change over time. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Without all the content, the merits of the topic are generally not clear. At any rate, it's common courtesy not to just tag articles by established users without giving them a chance to make a case for their article. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This seems like a running gag to me... I was noticing a trend of this sort of thing, myself. Incidentally, how about the fake &amp;quot;error messages&amp;quot; that say &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; on them? (I think in [[50 emails]], [[The System is Down]], and &amp;quot;Not the 100th E-mail!!&amp;quot; (can't remember the exact name, so I didn't put a link), but I could be mistaken...) -{{User:YK/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ha. Looks like Jay had the idea at the same time I did. =P -{{User:YK/sig}} 03:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Okay. Now that the page have a little more content, I don't ''really'' don't understand what this page is about. It lacks from several problems:&lt;br /&gt;
#The name suggests that that we are discussing real objects, but this article is about made-up objects. And also, so of the &amp;quot;objects&amp;quot; are really abstract, like a girlfriend. Tell any women that she is an object, let's see where that gets you.&lt;br /&gt;
#The scope of this article is poorly defined. I went over the examples and over [[blatant lies]], and while I see what the creator meant to do in this article, most of these items aren't related. Like Coach Z inviting &amp;quot;all kinds of real people over to [his] house for a coupla real people parties.&amp;quot; and Homestar making a &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; message. One is a lie told out of shame, the other is note.&lt;br /&gt;
#I had a three, but I think I merged that point with #1 or #2... either way this page needs either a major cleanup, a better definition, and name change and some trimming. And all that if it doesn't just get merged with [[blatant lies]], like I think it should be as it is now. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with some of this, particularly that the current name isn't exactly spot-on.  Maybe something more like [[&amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; Things]]? -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]] 06:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not opposed to a name change. Anyway, the gag here is that the characters ''refer'' as the thing they're lying about as being &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; - not just that they ''treat'' it that way. Thus, both examples noted (Coach Z invites &amp;quot;'''real''' people&amp;quot; to his &amp;quot;'''real''' people parties&amp;quot; and Homestar produces a &amp;quot;This is '''real'''&amp;quot; error message) fit perfectly. Was that unclear? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 06:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then let's use &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; in the title. '''Really 'Real' Items''' perhaps? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 08:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But I think there is a major difference between the two cases. Homestar was trying to cover up the fact the he made a flagrant error, and Coach Z was just plain-old creepy. The only connection is the world &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but the examples are inherently different. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 11:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: This page isn't documenting the INTENT of the lie - only that they're lying and awkwardly inserting the word &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; (/&amp;quot;actual&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;) as part of the lie. The only connection between them may be the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but as it happens, that's what the page is about in the first place. BTW, I looked over the page and, contrary to my own expectations, &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; is used far more than &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot;, so perhaps a page name with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would be better. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: For reference, this page is meant to be like [[Not X]] - notice, there, that the &amp;quot;Not MS Paint&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Strong Bad Emails: 1, Not Strong Bad Emails: 0&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the first thing I do is NOT drop a piano on Marzipan's head&amp;quot; gags have little to nothing in common outside of the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;. But since the page is ABOUT the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;, including all three examples is justified. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Better Commando Name ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to my initial impulse, &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot; is fairly rare in this running gag, so a title with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would probably be better. But there is some confusion over the scope of the article, so even with that in mind, a better commando name may be in order. Thoughts? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe 'Real' Objects? Highlights the questionable-at-best nature of these allegations. [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 05:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's more about the fact that these aren't all objects... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::True. 'Real' Things? [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 06:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here's an unwieldy long suggestion I could think of: '''Made-up objects referred to as real'''... That's all I got. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 07:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, it's accurate at least....[[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 08:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:05:12 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Allegedly Real Things</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Better Commando Name */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Deletion? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone explain where the scope of this page is in any way different from the scope of [[Blatant Lies]]? It just doesn't seem like there are two running gags happening here. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 02:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's more specific than &amp;quot;Blatant lies&amp;quot;. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Right, but Ryan S. is more specific than Mount Ridesplace Mascots, yet doesn't warrant its own page on the wiki. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sheesh, can he develop the page a little before you slap a tbd on it? &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I disagree that we can't talk in the abstract about the benefits of having a discussion on the scope. I mean, I would much rather allow this discussion to happen ''before'' someone invests their time into developing this and finding every instance of it. I actually find absolutely no issue in an abstract discussion, and frankly would prefer discussing the ''Merits'' of a page instead of the ''Content'' of a page. Content can always be expanded on, but there Merits of this scope exist the same today as they would a year from now. The merits won't change over time. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Without all the content, the merits of the topic are generally not clear. At any rate, it's common courtesy not to just tag articles by established users without giving them a chance to make a case for their article. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This seems like a running gag to me... I was noticing a trend of this sort of thing, myself. Incidentally, how about the fake &amp;quot;error messages&amp;quot; that say &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; on them? (I think in [[50 emails]], [[The System is Down]], and &amp;quot;Not the 100th E-mail!!&amp;quot; (can't remember the exact name, so I didn't put a link), but I could be mistaken...) -{{User:YK/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ha. Looks like Jay had the idea at the same time I did. =P -{{User:YK/sig}} 03:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Okay. Now that the page have a little more content, I don't ''really'' don't understand what this page is about. It lacks from several problems:&lt;br /&gt;
#The name suggests that that we are discussing real objects, but this article is about made-up objects. And also, so of the &amp;quot;objects&amp;quot; are really abstract, like a girlfriend. Tell any women that she is an object, let's see where that gets you.&lt;br /&gt;
#The scope of this article is poorly defined. I went over the examples and over [[blatant lies]], and while I see what the creator meant to do in this article, most of these items aren't related. Like Coach Z inviting &amp;quot;all kinds of real people over to [his] house for a coupla real people parties.&amp;quot; and Homestar making a &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; message. One is a lie told out of shame, the other is note.&lt;br /&gt;
#I had a three, but I think I merged that point with #1 or #2... either way this page needs either a major cleanup, a better definition, and name change and some trimming. And all that if it doesn't just get merged with [[blatant lies]], like I think it should be as it is now. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with some of this, particularly that the current name isn't exactly spot-on.  Maybe something more like [[&amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; Things]]? -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]] 06:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not opposed to a name change. Anyway, the gag here is that the characters ''refer'' as the thing they're lying about as being &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; - not just that they ''treat'' it that way. Thus, both examples noted (Coach Z invites &amp;quot;'''real''' people&amp;quot; to his &amp;quot;'''real''' people parties&amp;quot; and Homestar produces a &amp;quot;This is '''real'''&amp;quot; error message) fit perfectly. Was that unclear? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 06:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then let's use &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; in the title. '''Really 'Real' Items''' perhaps? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 08:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But I think there is a major difference between the two cases. Homestar was trying to cover up the fact the he made a flagrant error, and Coach Z was just plain-old creepy. The only connection is the world &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but the examples are inherently different. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 11:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: This page isn't documenting the INTENT of the lie - only that they're lying and awkwardly inserting the word &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; (/&amp;quot;actual&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;) as part of the lie. The only connection between them may be the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but as it happens, that's what the page is about in the first place. BTW, I looked over the page and, contrary to my own expectations, &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; is used far more than &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot;, so perhaps a page name with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would be better. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: For reference, this page is meant to be like [[Not X]] - notice, there, that the &amp;quot;Not MS Paint&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Strong Bad Emails: 1, Not Strong Bad Emails: 0&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the first thing I do is NOT drop a piano on Marzipan's head&amp;quot; gags have little to nothing in common outside of the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;. But since the page is ABOUT the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;, including all three examples is justified. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Better Commando Name ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to my initial impulse, &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot; is fairly rare in this running gag, so a title with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would probably be better. But there is some confusion over the scope of the article, so even with that in mind, a better commando name may be in order. Thoughts? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe 'Real' Objects? Highlights the questionable-at-best nature of these allegations. [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 05:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's more about the fact that these aren't all objects... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::True. 'Real' Things? [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 06:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 06:47:38 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:The Kitchen of the Brothers Strong</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:The_Kitchen_of_the_Brothers_Strong</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Deletion */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{tobediscussed}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Deletion==&lt;br /&gt;
No action take place here. Not a location, per se (more like a background). If there was anything to put on this page, I would support its existence, but right now there just is no content. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 02:41, 21 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question: The [[Living Room of the Brothers Strong]] and this room aren't separated by walls... should they be considered the same room? {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Like any location (that is not made up), there is no need for something big to happen in it for it to have an article. Therefor, I think this article should be '''kept'''. Also, from the preview videos on the different gaming sites seen from the demo, and from the trailer, there is more info to be gathered about what is actually in the kitchen. And after the game is out, even more info will be available. About merging it with the living room... I don't know. I think it's better to wait until the game is out before seeing what role the different rooms play in the game. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Answer for Trey - my kitchen and living room are not separated by a wall, well, not much of one anyway. But they should be considered two different rooms. And '''keep'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 21:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Answer for Qermaq - aggreed, This article should stay. If some one could add to it for me. That would be fine. {{User:TroggdorX/sig}} 11:00, 21 April 2008(EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Seems a bit to broad and undetailed. But I don't want this wiki to end up like 'Kipedia and merge several groups of articles into just one article (like they merged all the Homestar Runner characters' pages into one tiny section of a page). '''Keep.''' {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:11, 25 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::We should delete for now, and if it is needed later, create it. {{User:Slipknot6477/sig}} 20:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::'''Keep''', I don't see the sense in deleting while SBCG4AP is in production; what we've seen of it alrady indicates that there will be additional info available upon release. [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 06:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 06:04:03 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:The_Kitchen_of_the_Brothers_Strong</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Lazor</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Lazor</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Keep? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{tbd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keep?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not entirely sure if two more or less passing mentions of &amp;quot;Lazor&amp;quot; make it significant enough for a whole page... Maybe if they make an actual *appearance*, but otherwise, '''Delete''' for the time being. -{{User:YK/sig}} 00:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If we're going to keep any of it, it needs to just be in the Fast Forward of [[band names]].  '''Delete.''' --{{User:Onamuji/sig}} 03:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, I think it's clear that Bigg Nife does not deserve and article, however Taranchula and Limozeen do, so we need to establish where the line is to determine on which side of that line Lazor falls. For my money, I would say that the line lies in existing on the same plane of reality as the main characters, instead of simply as a suggestion from [[band names]]. So if that is the line. as I would propose, than this page is a candidate for '''Keep''' &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:Flashfight|Flashfight]] 04:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, the big difference I can see is that both Limozeen and Taranchula have made actual appearances. &amp;quot;Lazor&amp;quot;, however, has not. It's just been mentioned... and only twice, that I can see. (Where'd someone get that they originated in [[theme party]], though? I saw nothing referencing them there...) I agree that they're very likely to appear again... but I think it's best to wait until they *do* before giving them an article, considering we know close to zero *about* them. (Besides which, &amp;quot;Bigg Nife&amp;quot; *does* have an article... [[Big Knives|kinda]]. -{{User:YK/sig}} 06:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm on the fence here. On one side, it's mentioned as a &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; band in the Homestar Universe, as things that Strong Bad made up tend to. On the other side, it hasn't appeared/heard yet. If I'm not mistaken, we only made the Traranchula page only after they appeared in the Strong Bad CD. As far as these things go, if they were referenced once, you can bet that they are going to be again. In a few months/weeks you can expect a Lazor song. Seeing this trend, I don't mind to have this little, two-line article as a place-holder. But get rid on the infobox. I hate when it's just a bunch on &amp;quot;Unknown&amp;quot;s. In short: '''Keep'''. ({{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC))&lt;br /&gt;
:::::omg sign ur posts dood lol (Sorry. Couldn't resist. =P) -{{User:YK/sig}} 06:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: 'm s'ry. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I would like to forward the support coming from  [[User:MBD123|MBD123]] and [[User:Haldo|Haldo]] expressed on [[Talk:Limozeen Live!|Limozeen Live talk]] for the creation of this page; since they've already expressed their opinions. &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:Flashfight|Flashfight]] 13:51, 21 March 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think we should keep it, its worth something right [[User:Waluigi95|Waluigi95]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm with Onamuji -- '''Delete''' and move info to FF of Band Names.[[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 06:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Some Cleanup Things==&lt;br /&gt;
Just a few thing this page desperately needs:&lt;br /&gt;
*A Picture. Could someone with the technical know-how kindly upload and insert something relevant. Maybe the index card with the bands logo?&lt;br /&gt;
*Genre. However inaccurate the sounds accompanying the index card is, but since we have nothing else, could someone identify what genre they would be...I went with metal based on my limited knowledge of musical styles.&lt;br /&gt;
*Expansion of Prose. Something I'll probably get to tomorrow, but it's been a long day and anyone else who wants to take a crack at it is encouraged.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;mdash;[[User:Flashfight|Flashfight]] 06:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Index card added. I wasn't sure whether it would look better to crop it closer or not.. I thought that maybe it was best to show the whole card, but not sure. -- [[User:Mithent|Mithent]] 23:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crush? Guitarist? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A while ago someone added that Crush was the guitarist. Is there any evidence to actually support this preposterous hypothesis? {{User:Flashfight/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
:It's been a week, I'm taking it out. If there is any evidence to support this, please let me know. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 05:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The popup that mentions Crush giving Larry his hat in [[Limozeen Live!]] reads &amp;quot;Larry got this hat from the LAZOR guitarist 'Crush'&amp;quot;. -- [[User:Mithent|Mithent]]&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks alot, I must have missed that...thanks, I'll re-add it if no one has. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 19:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Metal? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there any way we can know for sure what Lazor's genre is? I saw someone had put &amp;quot;Metal&amp;quot;, but I think that it was just a guess. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 00:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I added it, based off of the 4 notes or so played after the card was displayed in [[band names]]. It was my guess based on that, but if you noticed in my cleanup talk above, I really wish someone else could take a crack at figgering the genre. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 00:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 06:00:52 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Lazor</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Blistergeist</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Blistergeist</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Merge with Minor Video Games */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{talktobediscussed}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Merge with [[Minor Video Games]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the creation of [[Minor Video Games]] and a subsequent decision to keep that page, [[Head Chopper 2]] was merged into that article, and the other video games from [[slumber party]] were added to it as well.  Blistergeist is almost as minor as the rest of them, except that &amp;quot;Blistergeist Mode&amp;quot; appears in the playable [[Clapping Party]]. Nevertheless, this is of rather slight significance, and I advocate '''redirecting this article to [[Minor Video Games#Blistergeist]]'''. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 02:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I dunno, I'm not a big fan of the tendency these days to merge things that have been around for a while into Minor X articles. I really feel articles like that should only be for things that are too minor and insignificant to possibly have their own article (Head Chopper and the other slumber party video games being examples of this). The article we have here stands alone fine, in my opinion (largely due to the Blistergeist mode on Clapping Party), and thus I'm going to oppose redirecting it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::My view is exactly the opposite. When all the info we have on something can fit neatly in a table with other things like it, I'm all for '''merging''' them. There's no special need to have a huge number of short (and oftentimes boring) articles. It doesn't make things more &amp;quot;encyclopedic&amp;quot;, IMO, just cluttered. But then, I've always been partial to lists, myself. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nice Chrono Trigger sig :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Heimstern, I agree that merging small articles on notable topics is a bad idea, but I think the problem with this article is that it doesn't have enough to stand on its own legs. The only thing that separates it from the rest of the slumber party video games is the appearance in Clapping Party, and that is 100% documented on [[Clapping Party]], where it belongs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Minor X articles are good when each element on them &lt;br /&gt;
::::(1) has small importance and &lt;br /&gt;
::::(2) is best understood in the context of the rest of the elements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In this case, Blistergeist ''only'' has significance when either&lt;br /&gt;
::::(1) lumped together with the rest of the M-rated video games or&lt;br /&gt;
::::(2) discussed as an unlockable mode in Clapping Party.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since it doesn't have any importance by itself, I contend that it shouldn't be on a page by itself. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It's stood on its own legs since 9 November; I don't see that anything has changed so that this is no longer the case. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, [[Minor Video Games]] has just recently been created. Until now, there hasn't really been a good alternative (we'd considered [[Slumber Party Games]] but ended up agreeing that wasn't appropriate). {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::That's exactly where I disagree with the methodology. I don't agree with the idea that we have an article that's OK on its own one day, but as soon as there's an article to merge it into, it should be merged; rather, it should be seen as either notable in and of itself or not so, regardless of what other articles exist. This is a bit off of the question of why this article should remain, but there's my thoughts on why merging should be done sparingly. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Yes, I agree that you're diverting from the issue at hand: the merit of ''this'' particular article. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 18:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Which I've already addressed above. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 18:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Clean break: anybody else have thoughts about this? {{User:Trey56/sig}} 18:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
definately '''merge'''. --[[User:Acam30|Acam30]] 00:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hello people... is there any reason this hasn't been merged/deleted yet? IS somebunny gonna take care of this little hiccup? --[[User:Acam30|Acam30]] 01:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, we really need more than four people to weigh in before acting on this. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 02:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd make the case that the info is already present in the Minor Video Games article and move for deletion. I really don't see what we'd gain by merging - indeed, this is already a case of duplicated info.[[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 05:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:56:19 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Blistergeist</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Allegedly Real Things</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;/* Better Commando Name */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Deletion? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone explain where the scope of this page is in any way different from the scope of [[Blatant Lies]]? It just doesn't seem like there are two running gags happening here. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 02:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's more specific than &amp;quot;Blatant lies&amp;quot;. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Right, but Ryan S. is more specific than Mount Ridesplace Mascots, yet doesn't warrant its own page on the wiki. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sheesh, can he develop the page a little before you slap a tbd on it? &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 03:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I disagree that we can't talk in the abstract about the benefits of having a discussion on the scope. I mean, I would much rather allow this discussion to happen ''before'' someone invests their time into developing this and finding every instance of it. I actually find absolutely no issue in an abstract discussion, and frankly would prefer discussing the ''Merits'' of a page instead of the ''Content'' of a page. Content can always be expanded on, but there Merits of this scope exist the same today as they would a year from now. The merits won't change over time. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 03:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Without all the content, the merits of the topic are generally not clear. At any rate, it's common courtesy not to just tag articles by established users without giving them a chance to make a case for their article. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This seems like a running gag to me... I was noticing a trend of this sort of thing, myself. Incidentally, how about the fake &amp;quot;error messages&amp;quot; that say &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; on them? (I think in [[50 emails]], [[The System is Down]], and &amp;quot;Not the 100th E-mail!!&amp;quot; (can't remember the exact name, so I didn't put a link), but I could be mistaken...) -{{User:YK/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ha. Looks like Jay had the idea at the same time I did. =P -{{User:YK/sig}} 03:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Okay. Now that the page have a little more content, I don't ''really'' don't understand what this page is about. It lacks from several problems:&lt;br /&gt;
#The name suggests that that we are discussing real objects, but this article is about made-up objects. And also, so of the &amp;quot;objects&amp;quot; are really abstract, like a girlfriend. Tell any women that she is an object, let's see where that gets you.&lt;br /&gt;
#The scope of this article is poorly defined. I went over the examples and over [[blatant lies]], and while I see what the creator meant to do in this article, most of these items aren't related. Like Coach Z inviting &amp;quot;all kinds of real people over to [his] house for a coupla real people parties.&amp;quot; and Homestar making a &amp;quot;This is real&amp;quot; message. One is a lie told out of shame, the other is note.&lt;br /&gt;
#I had a three, but I think I merged that point with #1 or #2... either way this page needs either a major cleanup, a better definition, and name change and some trimming. And all that if it doesn't just get merged with [[blatant lies]], like I think it should be as it is now. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with some of this, particularly that the current name isn't exactly spot-on.  Maybe something more like [[&amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; Things]]? -[[User:DAGRON|DAGRON]] 06:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not opposed to a name change. Anyway, the gag here is that the characters ''refer'' as the thing they're lying about as being &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; - not just that they ''treat'' it that way. Thus, both examples noted (Coach Z invites &amp;quot;'''real''' people&amp;quot; to his &amp;quot;'''real''' people parties&amp;quot; and Homestar produces a &amp;quot;This is '''real'''&amp;quot; error message) fit perfectly. Was that unclear? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 06:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then let's use &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; in the title. '''Really 'Real' Items''' perhaps? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 08:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But I think there is a major difference between the two cases. Homestar was trying to cover up the fact the he made a flagrant error, and Coach Z was just plain-old creepy. The only connection is the world &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but the examples are inherently different. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 11:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: This page isn't documenting the INTENT of the lie - only that they're lying and awkwardly inserting the word &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; (/&amp;quot;actual&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;true&amp;quot;) as part of the lie. The only connection between them may be the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot;, but as it happens, that's what the page is about in the first place. BTW, I looked over the page and, contrary to my own expectations, &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; is used far more than &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot;, so perhaps a page name with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would be better. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: For reference, this page is meant to be like [[Not X]] - notice, there, that the &amp;quot;Not MS Paint&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Strong Bad Emails: 1, Not Strong Bad Emails: 0&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the first thing I do is NOT drop a piano on Marzipan's head&amp;quot; gags have little to nothing in common outside of the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;. But since the page is ABOUT the awkward usage of &amp;quot;Not&amp;quot;, including all three examples is justified. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Better Commando Name ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to my initial impulse, &amp;quot;Actual&amp;quot; is fairly rare in this running gag, so a title with &amp;quot;Real&amp;quot; in it would probably be better. But there is some confusion over the scope of the article, so even with that in mind, a better commando name may be in order. Thoughts? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe 'Real' Objects? Highlights the questionable-at-best nature of these allegations. [[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 05:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:50:56 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Allegedly_Real_Things</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>User talk:Trey56</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Trey56</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{User:Trey56/talknav}}&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:Trey56#NES Endings Trivia Challenge|NES Endings Trivia Challenge]]==&lt;br /&gt;
===4 September 2007===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CoachZNoid.PNG|thumb|100px|Avoid the Noid!]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Where on homestarrunner.com has the main character of this game appeared?&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
Is [[Wikipedia:Yo! Noid|Yo! Noid]]. Main character appeared on the alternate Halloween Costumes [[secret page]]. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 22:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great jorb! Yep, [[Coach Z]] was thinking about dressing up as the Noid for Halloween in 2001, in [[The House That Gave Sucky Treats]], as seen [[HR:halloween01.swf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===11 September 2007===&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Where in a Homestar Runner cartoon have this game's main character's weapons appeared? Hint 1: The main character's name is an anagram of the name of the &amp;quot;makers&amp;quot; of a potential tomb for Strong Bad. Hint 2: A [[:Category:Bands|band]] has composed a song about this entombment.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure if I can take the credit for this one. When comparing this picture to Pok&amp;amp;eacute;mon with an online friend, he pointed out which game it's '''actually''' from. Anyway, there was a bell in [[Homestar Presents: Presents]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 03:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
PS. Because of the source, I intentionally left the game's title off.&lt;br /&gt;
::Yep, you've got the correct game in mind :) I don't think the bell sighting is quite right &amp;amp;mdash; if I'm not mistaken, there's not a ''visible'' bell in [[Homestar Presents: Presents]]... let me know if I'm wrong though. And let's see if someone else gets the game, and then I'll sort out to whom to give credit. Nice job, Jay and Jay's friend! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh, right, that was Homsar's paintbrush. :p He actually has an account here, though he doesn't use it anywhere near as much as I do. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 03:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Um, The Adventures of Bayou Billy? I have absolutely no NES trivia knowledge, just a guess. And Jay, I'm pretty sure Pokemon was never a NES game. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: You misunderstand. I compared the picture to Pok&amp;amp;eacute;mon with an online friend, and HE told me which game it REALLY came from, which, of course, wasn't Pok&amp;amp;eacute;mon. I left off the game's title because I don't know if I should take credit. And no, it's not Bayou Billy. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 03:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yup, not Bayou Billy. Keep trying! The hints should be helpful... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That game is none other than Little Samson, an obscure platformer. A pretty good one, at that. -[[User:GG Crono|GG Crono]] 03:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're so close it hurts! And you're right, this game is great! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I got it, I got it. I just had a little...mental stnank. -[[User:GG Crono|GG Crono]] 03:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: BTW, this was the friend I mentioned. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 03:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ooh, I see you {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Trey56&amp;amp;diff=498953&amp;amp;oldid=498952 fixed it}} &amp;amp;mdash; yep, it's ''[[Wikipedia:Little Samson|Little Samson]]''. Nice work, GG Crono! Anybody got the correct appearance of his weapons in the Homestar Runner body of work? {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think Jay did earlier. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Nope, not quite &amp;amp;mdash; Homsar's paintbrush makes a bell sound, but it doesn't count as bells &amp;quot;appearing&amp;quot;. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::No, I didn't. Hmm... [[Seasonal Sweaters]]? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 03:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[[Teen Girl Squad Issue 7]]? --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 03:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[[Seasonal Sweaters]] is the one! Good work, GG Crono and Jay; I'll put you on my user page shortly. By the way, the answers to the hints were the following: One of [[your funeral|Strong Bad's possible funerals]] involved preserving his body in a '''mason''' jar (about which [[Taranchula]] wrote a song). So the &amp;quot;makers&amp;quot; of the jar are &amp;quot;masons&amp;quot;, an anagram of which is &amp;quot;Samson&amp;quot;. Thanks for participating, everyone! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::By the way, SMB, [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 7]] was close, but the type of bell there is a school bell, as opposed to the style that Little Samson wields. Good guess! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Well, like I said earlier, I stink at NES trivia, so my guesses are pure guesses. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 04:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::No problem &amp;amp;mdash; thanks for participating! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 04:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===18 September 2007===&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;What Homestar Runner character has dabbled in the occupation of the villain of this game?&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
::That's easy. Homestar Runner was a jailer in [[Strong Bad is in Jail Cartoon]]. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:02, 18 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::By &amp;quot;occupation&amp;quot;, I mean &amp;quot;career&amp;quot;. Also, this one's probably straightforward, but what game is it? {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The game is Donkey Kong Jr.... as for the career of the villian... Bubs? He's done all sorts of crazy crap... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You've got the game, but your answer to the trivia isn't quite right &amp;amp;mdash; there's a more specific career and a Homestar Runner character who did quite a bit of it. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: You know, I always thought he was a plumber, so that'd leave The Buttcrack Plumber... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Like Mario, Homestar was a carpenter in Hands On Deck. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 17:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Yup! Back in the day, Mario was originally a carpenter. Nice job, guys! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 24 October 2007 ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Where has the name of this game's villain appeared (as text) on homestarrunner.com? Hint: the text is hidden in a recording. Hint 2: The text appears very close to someone with the male form of the name of &amp;quot;a really nice girl&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
::Dracula, the villain of [[Wikipedia:Castlevania II: Simon's Quest|Castlevania II: Simon's Quest]] has been mentioned in [[Malloween Commercial]] :-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 20:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You've got the game right (nice work!), but I'm looking for the place where his name has visually ''appeared'' on homestarrunner.com. Keep try! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 20:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Um, [[Count Longardeaux's Book|Count Longardeaux]]? From [[record book]]? Because they both have &amp;quot;Count&amp;quot; in their names? Please? {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 22:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice try! :D But there's a place where the name &amp;quot;Dracula&amp;quot; actually appears in print. Hint: it's deceptively easy... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Adventure Gamers Interview]]! {{User:Chaosvii7/sig}} 23:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope &amp;amp;mdash; that interview doesn't appear on homestarrunner.com! Keep try! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 23:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
does it literally apeear in print on the website? {{User:Chaosvii7/sig}} 23:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes sir! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 23:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Malloween Commercial]]? {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 23:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, however, one of the scenes in that toon is set in the same location as the one where Dracula's name appears... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 23:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, I didn't even notice that was the toon Loafing guessed. Sorry to waste your valuable time, {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 23:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's okay &amp;amp;mdash; my time is just like water. Trey56's time &amp;amp;mdash; why ever drink again? {{User:Trey56/sig}} 23:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know it's when Marshie pops up form the ground in front of the tombstone, but I can't think, or even find, where it says &amp;quot;Dracula.&amp;quot; {{User:Chaosvii7/sig}} 02:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
after looking at the image, i think the picture is from castlevania 1. am i rite? if not, back 2 jamesnintendonerd. {{User:Slipknot6477/sig}} 01:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Very close &amp;amp;mdash; it's ''Castlevania II: Simon's Quest'' (Loafing got the game above). But the associated trivia question is still up for grabs, if you still want to try that one!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:By the way, the Angry Video Game Nerd (I think his Youtube account is jamesnintendonerd) did a review of this game. Thanks for participating! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
[[japanese cartoon]]! Simon (male form of Simone, who is a really nice girl) is standing in front of Dracula's tomb (a cemetary was shown in Malloween Commercial) in the NES endings Easter egg that was the origin of this whole game! (Hence, deceptively easy.) &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 19:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are absolutely right &amp;amp;mdash; awesome job! Sorry to give out such a tricky question this time, but I thought it'd be a lot more fun than &amp;quot;where is this game referenced on homestarrunner.com&amp;quot;.  Anyways, that's all for the special Halloween Edition of the NES Endings challenge &amp;amp;mdash; thanks for participating, everyone! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 19:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 6 November 2007 ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Which two Homestar Runner [[characters]] have dressed up like the protagonists of this game?&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I doubt that any of the H*R characters have actually dressed up as [http://www.vgmuseum.com/end/nes/b/snow.htm snowmen]. There is a [[:Image:PomPomSnowman.png|snowman dressed up as Pom Pom]] in [[A Holiday Greeting]], and then there is Strong Sad dressed up as a snowman in [[Fall Float Parade]], but more or less involuntarily ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yep &amp;amp;mdash; you've got what I was looking for!  And you're right: I probably could have worded the question better.  At any rate, here's to 04 Glorious Seconds of Nunchucking Snowmen! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Snow Brothers  {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 20:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yessir! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1 April 2008 ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Long neck, no hands, 100 legs, cannot stand.  Born of a forest nest, Against a wall I rest.&amp;quot; (1) Where in the game can you find this item, and (2) what Homestar Runner character resembles it?&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Wikipedia:Shadowgate|Shadowgate]] is the game. You can find a broom, the answer to the riddle, in a room with a sphinx, and [[Marzipan]] looks like a broom. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Close enough &amp;amp;mdash; the riddle about the broom takes place in the sphinx room, but you actually get the broom in the mirror room. But you're close enough to win given all the April 1 confusion ;) Nice work! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 04:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== French Subtitles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to clear things up: you just added spaces to my translations before exclamation points and question marks. I question, though, because both my sister, who speaks French, and my french teacher both type and write without those spaces. I live in America, my two resources who helped me both learned French in Quebec. Is there something different between France french and Canadian french? {{User:Techgeekmbg/sig}} 06:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey there &amp;amp;mdash; there are a lot of difference between Canadian French and French as spoken in France, but I don't know if this is one of them. I do know that this is something that [[User:Meuhcoin|Meuhcoin]], a native speaker living in France [[User talk:Trey56/Archive 1#French subtitles|thought was important]]. It'd probably be best to keep doing that for consistency with all the ones he's transcribed. By the way, I didn't know this either before he corrected me &amp;amp;mdash; they didn't teach it in my French classes either. If you feel like it, it's probably worth contacting [[User:Meuhcoin|Meuhcoin]] about, if you can get ahold of him. Hope that helps! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 06:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Transcription ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for taking notice to my hard work. I'm glad someone noticed. I'd really like someone to proofread those so they can be removed from the list, Sorry I couldn't get back to you sooner, I was carving my HSR-related pumpakin. But, thanks for noticing. Do you think you could proofread those? Thanks,{{User:Homestarmy Commando1/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Absolutely &amp;amp;mdash; I'll be happy to proofread your transcripts for [[A Decemberween Pageant]], [[Halloween Fairstival]], and [[The Best Decemberween Ever]]. It might take me a day or two to have time to finish it, but I'll be sure to get it done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:By the way, which pumpkin did you make? Laters, {{User:Trey56/sig}} 02:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I made the one that's just the H*R logo. My pumpkin started drying up the day after I carved it, so the flimsy little star outline got all shriveled up and dissapeared. Other that that, it turned out gweat. Swarthily, Bubs's Concession Stand. Oops, I mean {{User:Homestarmy Commando1/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Aw, peas. I finally had a chance to proofread your transcripts, so I popped in my [[strongbad_email.exe Disc Five]], went to go look at the [[HRWiki:DVD commentary transcripts|commentaries you transcribed]], and realized that they're all on [[Everything Else, Volume 2]]. Which I don't have. So, I'm afraid I can't proofread them for you &amp;amp;mdash; sorry :( {{User:Trey56/sig}} 00:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Don't feel too bad. The couple people I asked to proofread those said they didn't have that DVD, so I guess nobody has that [[Everything Else, Volume 2]] DVD, I'll get someone to proof those. I was gonna do it myself, but I decided against it at the last minute(even though my dad's an English major). Thanks anyways, {{User:Homestarmy Commando1/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Uploading pictures==&lt;br /&gt;
I was wondering... how do you copy pictures from h*r toons and post them on the wiki? I'm creating a page and I need a certain picture on it.&lt;br /&gt;
Please respond, [[User:Don't say jorb 101|Don't say jorb 101]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi! Check out the &amp;quot;How to take a screenshot&amp;quot; section on [[Help:Image]]. Let me know if you have any other questions! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:41, 31 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I just have one more question: how do you organize userboxes? [[User:Don't say jorb 101|Don't say jorb 101]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good question. Put each one on a separate line, put &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{userboxtop}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; on a separate line above them all, and put &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;|}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; on a line below them all. So, it should look like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{userboxtop}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{userbox|...}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{userbox|...}}&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;br /&gt;
{{userbox|...}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Hope that helps, {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:58, 31 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== html URLs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you would ever like to find those HTML files you posted in the [[HRWiki:Sandbox|sandbox]], I pasted them [[User:Homestar-winner/URLs|here]]. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! I can also get them from {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&amp;amp;diff=511551&amp;amp;oldid=511511 this version}} of the Sandbox, so don't worry about keeping them on that page if you don't want. Also, just as a note for myself, this is just a version of [[HRWiki:Subtitles/Data]] with all of the sections in reverse chronological order. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
==Dansk!==&lt;br /&gt;
Will you send a message to me?{{User:HAJ/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, I sent {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:HAJ&amp;amp;diff=516269&amp;amp;oldid=516238 a test message}}. Welcome to the wiki! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== thanks to you! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
thank you for helping me. now for me to figure out how userboxes work [[User:Imdaman]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I went ahead and {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User:Imdaman&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=519788 fixed them}} &amp;amp;mdash; what I did was put each &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{userbox}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; on a separate line, put &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{userboxtop}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; on a separate line above them all, and put &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;|}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; on a line below them all. Hope that helps, and let me know if you have any more questions! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 18:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Music Video? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey Trey, would that musical part of the latest D-ween toon count as a music video? I'd really hate to do all that extra work, just to have it deleted and reformatted. I'm working on the page as we speak, so lemme know ASAP. Thanks, {{User:Homestarmy Commando1/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not 100% sure what you're asking... are you asking if the visuals should go on a separate page, like the [[Different Town Visuals]]? If so, then yeah, I think the visuals for the song wil probably end up at [[Happy Dethemberween Visuals]]... {{User:Trey56/sig}} 14:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. Thanks for the help. Sincerely, {{User:Homestarmy Commando1/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Help a Newbie? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Yo trey, i probably just overlooked this at some point in time, but how do I make my username appear in different colors or with pictures like yours? -[[User:GardenBoy|GardenBoy]] 20:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey there, GardenBoy &amp;amp;mdash; check out [[Help:Signature]] for help setting up a signature (and see also [[HRWiki:Signature]] for some restrictions to keep in mind while making it). Let me know if you have any questions while you're working on it! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 20:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for the help! By the way, what do you think? -[[User:GardenBoy|GardenBoy]] 21:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What the heck? I saved what I did! -[[User:GardenBoy|GardenBoy]] 21:46, 20 December 2007 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, forgot to do the preferences thing. Be right back... -[[User:GardenBoy|GardenBoy]] 21:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sigs FTW!!! -{{User:GardenBoy/sig}} 21:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I really like the way it looks! The &amp;quot;Edits&amp;quot; link sticks out of the required size a bit: {{sigbox|User:GardenBoy/sig}} Let me see if I can think of a way to easily fix it. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hmm, actually, it doesn't seem to affect the spacing of text around it:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. {{User:GardenBoy/sig}} Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::So, I think you're good to go &amp;amp;mdash; nice work! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ooh, last suggestion: if you want to make it so that the underlines don't stick out of the sigbox, you could change it to&lt;br /&gt;
::::::&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;white-space: nowrap&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:GardenBoy|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Elephant; color:#360;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''G''' a r d e n '''B''' o y&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] {&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:GardenBoy|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Rockwell; color:#F90;text-decoration:underline;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''T'''alk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;amp;middot; &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/Gardenboy|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Rockwell; color:#639;text-decoration:underline;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''E'''dits&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;}&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::::which looks like it should fit:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::{{sigbox raw|1=&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;white-space: nowrap&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:GardenBoy|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Elephant; color:#360;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''G''' a r d e n '''B''' o y&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] {&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:GardenBoy|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Rockwell; color:#F90;text-decoration:underline;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''T'''alk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;amp;middot; &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/Gardenboy|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Rockwell; color:#639;text-decoration:underline;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''E'''dits&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;}&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Hope that helps, {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I really apreciate it. a-pree-kee-ate. Whatever.-{{User:GardenBoy/sig}} 22:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E-Doughnut ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember when you told me the song from Happy Dethemberween was gonna be the Quote of the Week. You said &amp;quot;I bet you one e-doughnut it's gonna be the Quote of the Week.&amp;quot; BONK! You owe me 1 e-doughnut.--[[User:Onestop|ONESTOP]] 21:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But we haven't gotten a new Quote of the Week yet! I realize we might not get one this week, but if the next one they publish is not the Happy Dethemberween song, I will hold true to my promised e-doughnut :D {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:08, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Userbox instructions ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey Trey, sorry to bother you again, but is there a page with instructions on making userboxes, or whatever those &amp;quot;This user is a slice of pie&amp;quot; things are? Thanks in advance, -{{User:GardenBoy/sig}} 22:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup: check out [[HRWiki:Userbox]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::How do I keep missing these things? Also, I just read your welcome text and ''my'' birthday is April 15&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; too! How weird is that? Thanks again. -{{User:GardenBoy/sig}} 22:21, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ha &amp;amp;mdash; happy Tax Day! By the way, I thought of one last suggestion to make your sig perfectly adherent to the size regulations ([[#Help a Newbie?|see above]]). Laters! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Signature (Lux Acerbus) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, seein' as how you're a sysop, I'm hoping you can figure out what's wrong with my sig. First of all, the nowrap command or whatever it is that keeps my sig from breaking up into two lines seems to be making it push it outside the border of discussion pages [http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p70/LuxAcerbus/HRWiki.jpg like so]. In addition, the timestamp keeps showing up in one of those weird little blue boxes with the dotted line around it instead of the usual plain text fashion. I don't know what the crap I did, but if you have any suggestions, I'd much appreciate it. Thanks! {{User:Lux Acerbus/sig}} 03:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User:Lux_Acerbus/sig&amp;amp;diff=533436&amp;amp;oldid=532574 fixed}} the second of the two issues you mentioned (there was a missing &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; tag at the end of it). I'll look into the first issue (the border violation problem) and see if I can figure anything out. (Though maybe fixing the one issue fixed that one as well). {{User:Trey56/sig}} 04:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Okay, I figured it out.  The reason that's happening is the &amp;quot;--&amp;quot; you put before your signatures.  If you put the -- inside the no-wrap tag, like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;white-space: nowrap&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--...&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::then you won't see your signature bleed over the edge like that.  I'm not sure if you want it to be part of your signature or not, but at any rate, that's where the problem is.  But unless it really bothers you, I wouldn't worry about it: it's not a policy violation or anything.  Hope that helps! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 04:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== WANTED ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You still need to give me an e-doughnut. You have '''3''' days from January 15.--[[User:Onestop|ONESTOP]][[Image:bowler derby.PNG|20px]] 23:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;sigh* You're right. Okay, [[User talk:Onestop#e-doughnut|here]] it is. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 11:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Oop? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You removed my vote? I thought non-users could vote. I'm a user on the fanstuff. Why can't I use that account? It'd be nice if I could. I don't really want to get an account here, 'cause I'm not gunna be editing stuff much here. Still Ben, Ben. ([[User:70.54.13.39|70.54.13.39]] 17:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope, unfortunately only logged-in users may vote. From [[HRWiki:STUFF#instructions]], in the &amp;quot;Notes about voting&amp;quot; section:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You must be logged in when you vote. Votes cast by anonymous users do not count, and your vote will be deleted, even if you have an account. If you do not have an account, take a second to [[Special:Userlogin|create one]]. It won't bite you.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:So, unfortunately, if you want to vote, you'll have to create an account over here. It's okay if you don't plan to use it for anything else. Hope that helps, {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trey, my main man, my ace in the hole, I'm gonna level with you. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been tinkering around with my sig for about a weeks now, and I'm still having a small issue that the Help page isn't fixing: I would really like the images on either side of my name to link to my Talk and Contributions, respectively. Even using your sig as a model, what ends up happening is it says &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{image}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; in the external link blue.[[User:Flashfight|Flashfight]]. I came to you because solving promblems seems to be something you're especially good at. I thank you in advance for your time and patience with me. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 16:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey there. Yeah, this can be tricky. Fortunately, there's now a cool template that does this for you: {{tl|imagelink}}. To use it, type &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{imagelink|link=PAGENAME|image=FULL_IMAGE_URL}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, replacing &amp;quot;PAGENAME&amp;quot; with the wiki page you want to link to (e.g., &amp;quot;User talk:Flashfight&amp;quot;) and replacing &amp;quot;FULL_IMAGE_URL&amp;quot; with the full URL of the image you want to link to (e.g., &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.hrwiki.org/images/thumb/4/4d/Flashfight_Medal_Green.PNG/12px-Flashfight_Medal_Green.PNG&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) To get the URL for the small version of the image, just right-click on it and pick &amp;quot;Open image in new window&amp;quot;, or whatever the option's called.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hope that helps, and let me know if you have any other questions! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, everything seems to be working well, the only promblem is that I can't get the URL for the thumbnail of either picture (thanks for the URL of the medal...helped a lot). I'm using FireFox if that's relevant. When I right click on the thumbnail of the Cheat Commando, but it's just taking to the Upload log page, not the thumbnail page that the URL you gave. And I think you again for your patience. {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 18:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hmm... some sort of &amp;quot;open image in a new window&amp;quot; option should come up if you right-click (or CTRL+click on a Mac), but in case it doesn't work out for you, here's the URL for the other image: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.hrwiki.org/images/thumb/b/be/Flashfight.PNG/19px-Flashfight.PNG&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; &amp;amp;mdash; Hope that helps! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 19:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ok, it was the &amp;quot;open in new window&amp;quot; thing...I've got it, thanks 1*10^10 {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 20:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::No problem. And it looks like the links are working &amp;amp;mdash; good work! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:54, 8 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Telltale banned from the forums here ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heya,  I was wondering if you have the power or the connections to unban the Telltale offices from the HR Wiki Forums.  Not sure how that happened, but we're all looking forward to reading about our game :)  The IP is 208.106.40.170.  some of us have been using tunnels or alternate public IPs to get around it, but that's less than ideal. --[[User:Tabacco|Tabacco]] 21:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've notified the people who can possibly do something about this, so hopefully it's easily fixable. I'll let you know as soon as I find out more. By the way, the game looks great, and I'm loving all the inside references in the trailer! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Woo thanks!  The new stuff that we haven't quite gotten around to getting online should (hopefully) be equally entertaining. --[[User:Tabacco|Tabacco]] 21:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Well that was quick.  Looks like we're in! --[[User:Tabacco|Tabacco]] 21:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: [Edit conflict] I've unblocked the IP. I can't find any information as to why it was blocked in the first place. Cheers. &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 21:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Great! Let us know if you need anything else, and keep up the good work! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 21:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== User talk page blanking ==&lt;br /&gt;
Trey, the edit on my user talk was me, I just forgot to log in. I'm simply cleaning it out, ok? But thanks for your concern, [[User:Chipwich]][[User:Chipwich|Chipwich]] 23:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, no problem. Just making sure somebody wasn't going around blanking your page. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 23:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Excellence in Discussion. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flashfight Medal Blue.png|thumb|Be proud, you earned it!]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trey, it is my esteemed honor to award you with this, the second [[User:Flashfight#Barnstar_for_Excellence_in_Discussion| Medal for Excellence in Discussion]]! There are few people on The Wiki as committed to consensus building as you, but that is not the primary reason for your awardation. Over the year or so that I have been contributing, I have seen no one as patient or understanding with new users as yourself. Truly, it is your calm, level-headed discourse that serves as the model for civility in Talk Pages. When so many of us fall into unfortunate patterns of edit-wars and frustration, it seems that there are few who seem to conduct themselves with more tact and professionalism than you. It is an honor to award you this small token of my appreciation for keeping our little Knowledge Base a little more civil. &lt;br /&gt;
{{User:Flashfight/sig}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow, thanks a lot! That's nice of you :) {{User:Trey56/sig}} 15:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks For the Welcome!==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It makes a nice change to turn up at a wiki and get the feeling you're in an actual community, not an nedlesscluster of faceless ones. :P Beleive me, thoguh, I'm not that experienced - I mostly footer about on the edge of things to hide my poor wiki markup ski11z. I cheated my way through the double redirects. :)&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously thoguh, thanks again, and i'llsee you around.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Scanna|Scanna]] 05:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:48:34 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Trey56</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>User talk:Scanna</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Scanna</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;removed the welcome-bot message&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Welcome! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey there, Scanna &amp;amp;mdash; welcome to the Homestar Runner Wiki! Nice job fixing those {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Twisting_emails&amp;amp;diff=561493&amp;amp;oldid=526140 double}} {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Twisting_emails&amp;amp;diff=561492&amp;amp;oldid=526142 redirects}} &amp;amp;mdash; we can always use more people looking out for stuff like that. So, it sounds from your user page that you're pretty familiar with wikis already, but if you have any questions, don't hesitate to [[User talk:Trey56|stop by my talk page]]. See you around! {{User:Trey56/sig}} 05:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:45:13 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Scanna</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>User:Scanna</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User:Scanna</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;Page creation. I'll put decent stuff in, someday. But not today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Scanna is a Wiki migrant with waaay too much time on his hands, who still somehow manages to be congenitally lazy. He'll make himself a page later.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:37:02 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Scanna</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Twisting emails</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Twisting_emails</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;Changing page to avoid double redirect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Emails Taken in a Different Direction]]&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:35:44 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Twisting_emails</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Talk:Twisting emails</title>
			<link>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Twisting_emails</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scanna:&amp;#32;Changing page to avoid double redirect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Talk:Emails Taken in a Different Direction]]&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:35:07 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Scanna</dc:creator>			<comments>http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Twisting_emails</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>