User talk:flashstorm - Revision history

Jay at 09:52, 11 March 2005

Jay — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:52:50 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 11 March 2005
Line 9:		Line 9:
	----		----
	You are right, i didn't understand. But thank you for clearing that up. Um, just one quick question, would that fact fit in any other catagories? The one with The Cheat being unemployed? Perhaps Goofs? I dont know, i am a noob.		You are right, i didn't understand. But thank you for clearing that up. Um, just one quick question, would that fact fit in any other catagories? The one with The Cheat being unemployed? Perhaps Goofs? I dont know, i am a noob.
		+	: If you think it's notable enough, that might be an okay Remark. But it also has a lot to do with what other people think of it. I think it's on the STUFF page; if it is, leave it there for now and see how people vote on it. --[[User:Jay\|Jay]] 02:52, 11 Mar 2005 (MST)

flashstorm at 04:14, 11 March 2005

flashstorm — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:14:22 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:14, 11 March 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	----		----
-	You are right, i didn't understand. But thank you for clearing that up. Um, just one quick question, would that fact fit in any other catagories?	+	You are right, i didn't understand. But thank you for clearing that up. Um, just one quick question, would that fact fit in any other catagories? The one with The Cheat being unemployed? Perhaps Goofs? I dont know, i am a noob.

flashstorm at 04:10, 11 March 2005

flashstorm — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:10:10 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 11 March 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Just a heads up. I don't mean to insult you in any way, just thought I'd let you know. --[[User:Jay\|Jay]] 21:03, 10 Mar 2005 (MST)		Just a heads up. I don't mean to insult you in any way, just thought I'd let you know. --[[User:Jay\|Jay]] 21:03, 10 Mar 2005 (MST)
		+
		+	----
		+	You are right, i didn't understand. But thank you for clearing that up. Um, just one quick question, would that fact fit in any other catagories?

Jay: Re: Fast Forward

Jay — Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:03:09 GMT

Re: Fast Forward

New page

Er, I think you're a little unclear on what the "Fast Forward" category means. A fact in "Fast Forward" - which only really applies when the Fun Facts are split - directly refers to something that hadn't yet happened when the toon was created. Meanwhile, an Inside Reference directly refers to something that HAD happened before the toon's creation (and is on the H*R website, but I'm sure you figured that much out on your own.)

The terms "forward reference" and "backwards reference" refer to facts in Fast Forward and the two Reference categories, respectively.

Thus, your mention of [[montage]] in [[lackey]] fails Inside References in two ways - it's not a direct reference (the events of lackey don't refer to the events of montage or vice-versa) and it's not backwards. And although I'd definitely agree with you that the fact was useless and wrong, the remark that "this is the only time Homsar's words have made sense" is NOT a forward reference because it's not referring to anything.

Just a heads up. I don't mean to insult you in any way, just thought I'd let you know. --[[User:Jay|Jay]] 21:03, 10 Mar 2005 (MST)