User talk:Olleicua - Revision history

Olleicua: /* Template:label and Updates page */

Olleicua — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:56:39 GMT

Template:label and Updates page

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:56, 11 October 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::Sorry, I am used to Wikipedia where the BE BOLD policy is popular. I forgot that this policy is not universal to wikis. I would, however like to see this properly implemented as I think it would be a great improvement to the wiki		:::Sorry, I am used to Wikipedia where the BE BOLD policy is popular. I forgot that this policy is not universal to wikis. I would, however like to see this properly implemented as I think it would be a great improvement to the wiki
	::::"Be bold" is popular here too, but it's more "[[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be\|be bold, but know when not to be.]]" If something would mean a large change, or a large number of changes, it's better to bring it up on a talk page first. The main reason for "be bold" is that if you make a mistake it's easy to revert... thus your boldness should be inversely proportional to the difficulty of reverting, which increases with large changes. Plus there's the whole [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle\|BOLD, revert, discuss cycle]] thing, which is basically what's happening here. So: no harm, no foul. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 17:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)		::::"Be bold" is popular here too, but it's more "[[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be\|be bold, but know when not to be.]]" If something would mean a large change, or a large number of changes, it's better to bring it up on a talk page first. The main reason for "be bold" is that if you make a mistake it's easy to revert... thus your boldness should be inversely proportional to the difficulty of reverting, which increases with large changes. Plus there's the whole [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle\|BOLD, revert, discuss cycle]] thing, which is basically what's happening here. So: no harm, no foul. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 17:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	:::::Kewl. Insidentally, I really like what <i>did</i> end up happening to [[template:whatsnew]]. It was more that I tried introducing the idea a while ago and nothing happened with it. Rather than have that happen, I tried to bring to people's attension. I deffinately could have done it in a more reversable way. Thanks [[User:Olleicua\|Olleicua]] 03:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Phlip: /* Template:label and Updates page */ Reply for Olleicua

Phlip — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:07:59 GMT

Template:label and Updates page: Reply for Olleicua

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 8 October 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::Because that idea is relativly old, it would have been better if you brought it up again. Phlip have already did so, be advised for next time. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 16:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)		::Because that idea is relativly old, it would have been better if you brought it up again. Phlip have already did so, be advised for next time. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 16:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
	:::Sorry, I am used to Wikipedia where the BE BOLD policy is popular. I forgot that this policy is not universal to wikis. I would, however like to see this properly implemented as I think it would be a great improvement to the wiki		:::Sorry, I am used to Wikipedia where the BE BOLD policy is popular. I forgot that this policy is not universal to wikis. I would, however like to see this properly implemented as I think it would be a great improvement to the wiki
		+	::::"Be bold" is popular here too, but it's more "[[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be\|be bold, but know when not to be.]]" If something would mean a large change, or a large number of changes, it's better to bring it up on a talk page first. The main reason for "be bold" is that if you make a mistake it's easy to revert... thus your boldness should be inversely proportional to the difficulty of reverting, which increases with large changes. Plus there's the whole [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle\|BOLD, revert, discuss cycle]] thing, which is basically what's happening here. So: no harm, no foul. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 17:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Olleicua: /* Template:label and Updates page */

Olleicua — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:48:58 GMT

Template:label and Updates page

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 8 October 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	[[User:Olleicua\|Olleicua]] 16:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)		[[User:Olleicua\|Olleicua]] 16:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
	::Because that idea is relativly old, it would have been better if you brought it up again. Phlip have already did so, be advised for next time. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 16:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)		::Because that idea is relativly old, it would have been better if you brought it up again. Phlip have already did so, be advised for next time. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 16:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	:::Sorry, I am used to Wikipedia where the BE BOLD policy is popular. I forgot that this policy is not universal to wikis. I would, however like to see this properly implemented as I think it would be a great improvement to the wiki

Elcool: reply

Elcool — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:46:02 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 8 October 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Hello there. I cn see where you want to go with that thing, but could you please talk about it before going through all the pages and changing them? Maybe get a bit of consesus? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 16:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)		Hello there. I cn see where you want to go with that thing, but could you please talk about it before going through all the pages and changing them? Maybe get a bit of consesus? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 16:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	:this was created in responce to a conversation [[Talk:H%2AR.com_updates_2006#Idea\|here]]. It was talked about a while ago and I decided to try implementing it. It would be used on other pages only on a case by case basis if it was decided to be useful there. Thank you for the concern.
		+	[[User:Olleicua\|Olleicua]] 16:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	::Because that idea is relativly old, it would have been better if you brought it up again. Phlip have already did so, be advised for next time. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 16:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Elcool: Template:label and Updates page

Elcool — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:27:41 GMT

Template:label and Updates page

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 8 October 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Those redirects point to the disambiguation page on purpose. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)		Those redirects point to the disambiguation page on purpose. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Template:label and Updates page ==
		+
		+	Hello there. I cn see where you want to go with that thing, but could you please talk about it before going through all the pages and changing them? Maybe get a bit of consesus? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 16:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

It's dot com: note

It's dot com — Mon, 10 Apr 2006 02:18:53 GMT

note

New page

Hey Olleicua. Welcome to the wiki!

Those redirects point to the disambiguation page on purpose. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 02:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)