User talk:Broncotroll - Revision history

Broncotroll: /* Regarding Deleting Articles */

Broncotroll — Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:56:48 GMT

Regarding Deleting Articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 7 September 2015
Line 195:		Line 195:

	::::: You can leave the To Be Discussed templates up and an admin will deal with discussed articles when one of them feels like doing some work in the Articles for Discussion category. Sure wiki activity will be slow, discussions might be slow to happen if at all, but it's fair to give at least some time for discussions to take place. Bronco, you do good work here, but I figured I could offer advice on the process of Articles of Discussion (and to help make the admins' jobs easier in logging what happened with each discussed article). — [[User:Ngamer01\|Ngamer01]] 14:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)		::::: You can leave the To Be Discussed templates up and an admin will deal with discussed articles when one of them feels like doing some work in the Articles for Discussion category. Sure wiki activity will be slow, discussions might be slow to happen if at all, but it's fair to give at least some time for discussions to take place. Bronco, you do good work here, but I figured I could offer advice on the process of Articles of Discussion (and to help make the admins' jobs easier in logging what happened with each discussed article). — [[User:Ngamer01\|Ngamer01]] 14:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::::: You're right in that I was in a bit of a rush to clear out TBD, but I also got all of my changes vetted. Anyway, I do appreciate the advice.{{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 15:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Ngamer01: /* Regarding Deleting Articles */ Making another comment. There is no hurry to clear out Articles for Discussion since that project has no time limit even with low wiki activity.

Ngamer01 — Mon, 07 Sep 2015 14:56:00 GMT

Regarding Deleting Articles: Making another comment. There is no hurry to clear out Articles for Discussion since that project has no time limit even with low wiki activity.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 7 September 2015
Line 192:		Line 192:
	::: I put Sam and Max up for deletion? I didn't mean to. It's the only one with legitimate references. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)		::: I put Sam and Max up for deletion? I didn't mean to. It's the only one with legitimate references. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
	:::: I just looked, never put it up for deletion. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)		:::: I just looked, never put it up for deletion. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
		+	::::: I know Catjaz striked this out, but unlike other H*R Wiki projects like the former Featured Articles project that went by a time limit and thus was fine with minimal consensus, article deletions don't have a time limit. Sure for matters where articles are voted to be moved to a new name or merged into similar articles, users can handle that themselves by redirecting/merging + deleted talk after a sufficient period of time, but there is no hurry to nuke an article voted to be deleted outright (unless it's obvious spam/vandalism).
		+
		+	::::: You can leave the To Be Discussed templates up and an admin will deal with discussed articles when one of them feels like doing some work in the Articles for Discussion category. Sure wiki activity will be slow, discussions might be slow to happen if at all, but it's fair to give at least some time for discussions to take place. Bronco, you do good work here, but I figured I could offer advice on the process of Articles of Discussion (and to help make the admins' jobs easier in logging what happened with each discussed article). — [[User:Ngamer01\|Ngamer01]] 14:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Catjaz63: honestly what did I expect of myself

Catjaz63 — Mon, 07 Sep 2015 05:43:11 GMT

honestly what did I expect of myself

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:43, 7 September 2015
Line 189:		Line 189:
	: Every article I've deleted is already up for discussion, and my deletions are all vetted usually before if not after I add the delete template. You're not giving me enough credit. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 17:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)		: Every article I've deleted is already up for discussion, and my deletions are all vetted usually before if not after I add the delete template. You're not giving me enough credit. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 17:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

-	::Honestly, the only real mark for deletion that I think was premature was Sam and Max. The [[Talk:Sam & Max\|only person who was for the deletion]] was Broncotroll herself. Most of her other markings were done with other people agreeing on the talk page. There's such a small amount of active editors here that I don't think we should be expecting any more than three people to comment on a deletion. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)	+	::<s>Honestly, the only real mark for deletion that I think was premature was Sam and Max. The [[Talk:Sam & Max\|only person who was for the deletion]] was Broncotroll herself. Most of her other markings were done with other people agreeing on the talk page. There's such a small amount of active editors here that I don't think we should be expecting any more than three people to comment on a deletion. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)</s>
	::: I put Sam and Max up for deletion? I didn't mean to. It's the only one with legitimate references. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)		::: I put Sam and Max up for deletion? I didn't mean to. It's the only one with legitimate references. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
	:::: I just looked, never put it up for deletion. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)		:::: I just looked, never put it up for deletion. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Broncotroll: /* Regarding Deleting Articles */

Broncotroll — Mon, 07 Sep 2015 04:08:45 GMT

Regarding Deleting Articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:08, 7 September 2015
Line 191:		Line 191:
	::Honestly, the only real mark for deletion that I think was premature was Sam and Max. The [[Talk:Sam & Max\|only person who was for the deletion]] was Broncotroll herself. Most of her other markings were done with other people agreeing on the talk page. There's such a small amount of active editors here that I don't think we should be expecting any more than three people to comment on a deletion. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)		::Honestly, the only real mark for deletion that I think was premature was Sam and Max. The [[Talk:Sam & Max\|only person who was for the deletion]] was Broncotroll herself. Most of her other markings were done with other people agreeing on the talk page. There's such a small amount of active editors here that I don't think we should be expecting any more than three people to comment on a deletion. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
	::: I put Sam and Max up for deletion? I didn't mean to. It's the only one with legitimate references. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)		::: I put Sam and Max up for deletion? I didn't mean to. It's the only one with legitimate references. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
		+	:::: I just looked, never put it up for deletion. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Broncotroll: /* Regarding Deleting Articles */

Broncotroll — Mon, 07 Sep 2015 04:08:10 GMT

Regarding Deleting Articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:08, 7 September 2015
Line 190:		Line 190:

	::Honestly, the only real mark for deletion that I think was premature was Sam and Max. The [[Talk:Sam & Max\|only person who was for the deletion]] was Broncotroll herself. Most of her other markings were done with other people agreeing on the talk page. There's such a small amount of active editors here that I don't think we should be expecting any more than three people to comment on a deletion. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)		::Honestly, the only real mark for deletion that I think was premature was Sam and Max. The [[Talk:Sam & Max\|only person who was for the deletion]] was Broncotroll herself. Most of her other markings were done with other people agreeing on the talk page. There's such a small amount of active editors here that I don't think we should be expecting any more than three people to comment on a deletion. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
		+	::: I put Sam and Max up for deletion? I didn't mean to. It's the only one with legitimate references. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 04:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Catjaz63: addendum

Catjaz63 — Sun, 06 Sep 2015 20:44:30 GMT

addendum

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 6 September 2015
Line 189:		Line 189:
	: Every article I've deleted is already up for discussion, and my deletions are all vetted usually before if not after I add the delete template. You're not giving me enough credit. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 17:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)		: Every article I've deleted is already up for discussion, and my deletions are all vetted usually before if not after I add the delete template. You're not giving me enough credit. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 17:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

-	::Honestly, the only real mark for deletion that I think was premature was Sam and Max. The [[Talk:Sam & Max\|only person who was for the deletion]] was Broncotroll herself. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)	+	::Honestly, the only real mark for deletion that I think was premature was Sam and Max. The [[Talk:Sam & Max\|only person who was for the deletion]] was Broncotroll herself. Most of her other markings were done with other people agreeing on the talk page. There's such a small amount of active editors here that I don't think we should be expecting any more than three people to comment on a deletion. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Catjaz63: premature marking for deletion

Catjaz63 — Sun, 06 Sep 2015 20:22:39 GMT

premature marking for deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 6 September 2015
Line 188:		Line 188:

	: Every article I've deleted is already up for discussion, and my deletions are all vetted usually before if not after I add the delete template. You're not giving me enough credit. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 17:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)		: Every article I've deleted is already up for discussion, and my deletions are all vetted usually before if not after I add the delete template. You're not giving me enough credit. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 17:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Honestly, the only real mark for deletion that I think was premature was Sam and Max. The [[Talk:Sam & Max\|only person who was for the deletion]] was Broncotroll herself. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Broncotroll at 17:16, 6 September 2015

Broncotroll — Sun, 06 Sep 2015 17:16:49 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 6 September 2015
Line 186:		Line 186:

	Remember <nowiki>{{tbd}}</nowiki> for articles and <nowiki>{{ttbd}}</nowiki> for article talk pages that should have a discussion about article quality. I hope this helps. — [[User:Ngamer01\|Ngamer01]] 16:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)		Remember <nowiki>{{tbd}}</nowiki> for articles and <nowiki>{{ttbd}}</nowiki> for article talk pages that should have a discussion about article quality. I hope this helps. — [[User:Ngamer01\|Ngamer01]] 16:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Every article I've deleted is already up for discussion, and my deletions are all vetted usually before if not after I add the delete template. You're not giving me enough credit. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 17:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Ngamer01: /**/Regarding Deleting Articles

Ngamer01 — Sat, 05 Sep 2015 16:19:06 GMT

: Regarding Deleting Articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 5 September 2015
Line 180:		Line 180:

	Heyo! It seems that when removing templates, you appear to leave blank space. If you could, please make sure there are no spaces at the top of articles or talk pages. DeFendm'n has been removing these spaces behind you, so I think he would probably appreciate it if you delete the spaces. Thanks! - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 18:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)		Heyo! It seems that when removing templates, you appear to leave blank space. If you could, please make sure there are no spaces at the top of articles or talk pages. DeFendm'n has been removing these spaces behind you, so I think he would probably appreciate it if you delete the spaces. Thanks! - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 18:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Regarding Deleting Articles ==
		+
		+	I've happened to notice you're quick on the draw to label "unnecessary" articles with the speedy delete template (and sometimes add the "Deleted Talk" template for talk pages). The correct process for main articles though is to use the "To Be Discussed" template (and "Talk To Be Discussed" for talk pages). Even if it's a slow process due to lack of overall wiki activity, it's supposed to give people time to talk and discuss an article's quality and only when most people agree that an article can't be saved, then an admin or a user with mod privileges can delete the article and slap "Deleted Talk" on the talk page.
		+
		+	Remember <nowiki>{{tbd}}</nowiki> for articles and <nowiki>{{ttbd}}</nowiki> for article talk pages that should have a discussion about article quality. I hope this helps. — [[User:Ngamer01\|Ngamer01]] 16:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Wiki Etiquette */ daaaAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaAAAAAAAAAaaaaaAAAAAa, i'm just a friendly signature...

Defender1031 — Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:24:04 GMT

Wiki Etiquette: daaaAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaAAAAAAAAAaaaaaAAAAAa, i'm just a friendly signature...

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 18 August 2015
Line 140:		Line 140:
	:: Oh, thanks. And I'm sorry I lashed out at you. It kind of bothered me a little when Defender said it, but only because in both cases it seems like a backhanded compliment. Probably just me projecting my promblems. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 01:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)		:: Oh, thanks. And I'm sorry I lashed out at you. It kind of bothered me a little when Defender said it, but only because in both cases it seems like a backhanded compliment. Probably just me projecting my promblems. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 01:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
	:::It was supposed to be a fronthanded compliment which also pointed out that the rest of us have a hard time keeping up... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)		:::It was supposed to be a fronthanded compliment which also pointed out that the rest of us have a hard time keeping up... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
-	::::Just a friendly reminder of the above, {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATwo_More_Eggs&diff=751110&oldid=751092 this series of edits}} falls under the category of "tons of talk posts at once"	+	::::Just a friendly reminder of the above, {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATwo_More_Eggs&diff=751110&oldid=751092 this series of edits}} falls under the category of "tons of talk posts at once" {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

	== Image tags ==		== Image tags ==