User talk:68.149.165.171 - Revision history

Tom: Reverted edit of Gafaddict, changed back to last version by 68.149.165.171

Tom — Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:59:11 GMT

Reverted edit of Gafaddict, changed back to last version by 68.149.165.171

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 20 March 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I know you're trying to help, and yes there are a lot of really bad "Fun Facts" cluttering the Wiki. But I've noticed you deleting perfectly good Fun Facts, often with little or no explanation. At the very least, can you bring them up on the corresponding Talk pages or add them to [[STUFF]], and explain why you don't like them? --[[User:Jay\|Jay]] 23:39, 16 Feb 2005 (MST)		I know you're trying to help, and yes there are a lot of really bad "Fun Facts" cluttering the Wiki. But I've noticed you deleting perfectly good Fun Facts, often with little or no explanation. At the very least, can you bring them up on the corresponding Talk pages or add them to [[STUFF]], and explain why you don't like them? --[[User:Jay\|Jay]] 23:39, 16 Feb 2005 (MST)

-	OK. --68.149.165.171	+	OK. ---[[User:68.149.165.171\|68.149.165.171]]

Gafaddict at 06:05, 20 March 2005

Gafaddict — Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:05:10 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 20 March 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I know you're trying to help, and yes there are a lot of really bad "Fun Facts" cluttering the Wiki. But I've noticed you deleting perfectly good Fun Facts, often with little or no explanation. At the very least, can you bring them up on the corresponding Talk pages or add them to [[STUFF]], and explain why you don't like them? --[[User:Jay\|Jay]] 23:39, 16 Feb 2005 (MST)		I know you're trying to help, and yes there are a lot of really bad "Fun Facts" cluttering the Wiki. But I've noticed you deleting perfectly good Fun Facts, often with little or no explanation. At the very least, can you bring them up on the corresponding Talk pages or add them to [[STUFF]], and explain why you don't like them? --[[User:Jay\|Jay]] 23:39, 16 Feb 2005 (MST)

-	OK. --~~-[[User:~~68.149.165.171~~\|68.149.165.171]]~~	+	OK. --68.149.165.171

68.149.165.171 at 23:43, 21 February 2005

68.149.165.171 — Mon, 21 Feb 2005 23:43:57 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 21 February 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I know you're trying to help, and yes there are a lot of really bad "Fun Facts" cluttering the Wiki. But I've noticed you deleting perfectly good Fun Facts, often with little or no explanation. At the very least, can you bring them up on the corresponding Talk pages or add them to [[STUFF]], and explain why you don't like them? --[[User:Jay\|Jay]] 23:39, 16 Feb 2005 (MST)		I know you're trying to help, and yes there are a lot of really bad "Fun Facts" cluttering the Wiki. But I've noticed you deleting perfectly good Fun Facts, often with little or no explanation. At the very least, can you bring them up on the corresponding Talk pages or add them to [[STUFF]], and explain why you don't like them? --[[User:Jay\|Jay]] 23:39, 16 Feb 2005 (MST)
		+
		+	OK. ---[[User:68.149.165.171\|68.149.165.171]]

Jay at 06:39, 17 February 2005

Jay — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:39:47 GMT

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:39, 17 February 2005
Line 1:	Line 1:
-	+	I know you're trying to help, and yes there are a lot of really bad "Fun Facts" cluttering the Wiki. But I've noticed you deleting perfectly good Fun Facts, often with little or no explanation. At the very least, can you bring them up on the corresponding Talk pages or add them to [[STUFF]], and explain why you don't like them? --[[User:Jay\|Jay]] 23:39, 16 Feb 2005 (MST)

68.149.165.171 at 05:50, 24 January 2005

68.149.165.171 — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:50:11 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:50, 24 January 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	You seem to contribute a fair bit for someone who thinks that the entire system is flawed. I would have to disagree with your statements about peer review. You are a very random person on the internet, just like us. Welcome to your peer group. Last time I checked, those screaming on street corners did not have to submit to a peer review either.

-	We are not a scientific journal; we are an informal collective of fans. As great as the Wikipedia is I would not site it in a paper due to its informal nature. [[User:Drhaggis\|<nowiki></nowiki>]]- [[User:Drhaggis\|Dr Haggis]] - [[User talk: Drhaggis\|Talk]] 12:33, 23 Jan 2005 (MST)

Drhaggis: comments to my peer

Drhaggis — Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:33:08 GMT

comments to my peer

New page

You seem to contribute a fair bit for someone who thinks that the entire system is flawed. I would have to disagree with your statements about peer review. You are a very random person on the internet, just like us. Welcome to your peer group. Last time I checked, those screaming on street corners did not have to submit to a peer review either.

We are not a scientific journal; we are an informal collective of fans. As great as the Wikipedia is I would not site it in a paper due to its informal nature. [[User:Drhaggis|<nowiki></nowiki>]]- [[User:Drhaggis|Dr Haggis]] - [[User talk: Drhaggis|Talk]] 12:33, 23 Jan 2005 (MST)