Talk:twelve - Revision history

It's dot com: deletedtalk

It's dot com — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:17:52 GMT

deletedtalk

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 10 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}
	== Discussion ==		== Discussion ==
	We don't need this page. It's poorly punctuated and has no reason to be here. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}		We don't need this page. It's poorly punctuated and has no reason to be here. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}

Religious Corn: why?

Religious Corn — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:35:19 GMT

why?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 10 October 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::At present, there just aren't two many particularly notable uses of the number twelve. Twelve-times-a-day Man is certainly a notable example, but there seem to be few others to make this number stand out above the others. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)		::::At present, there just aren't two many particularly notable uses of the number twelve. Twelve-times-a-day Man is certainly a notable example, but there seem to be few others to make this number stand out above the others. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
	:::::I really don't know what we should do with this page, but I think we should have more than 3 instances. Unlike [[G]], I never noticed the number 12 more so than [[Twelve Times A Day Man]]. I think it should be '''Deleted.''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}		:::::I really don't know what we should do with this page, but I think we should have more than 3 instances. Unlike [[G]], I never noticed the number 12 more so than [[Twelve Times A Day Man]]. I think it should be '''Deleted.''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}
		+	::::::Me too, because there aren't enough appearances for it to be able to have its own page. {{User:Religious Corn/sig}} 17:35, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

MichaelXX2: Another opinion

MichaelXX2 — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:11:36 GMT

Another opinion

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 9 October 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::Hmm... I actually don't know if this should be deleted. I saw like, 3 references to the number twelve in Strong Badia the Free (I noticed at the time but don't remember them now). If we DO keep it, though, it needs a major rewrite. "Appearances Found Only on HRWiki"? For shame! {{User:Compgrl323/sig}} 05:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)		:::Hmm... I actually don't know if this should be deleted. I saw like, 3 references to the number twelve in Strong Badia the Free (I noticed at the time but don't remember them now). If we DO keep it, though, it needs a major rewrite. "Appearances Found Only on HRWiki"? For shame! {{User:Compgrl323/sig}} 05:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
	::::At present, there just aren't two many particularly notable uses of the number twelve. Twelve-times-a-day Man is certainly a notable example, but there seem to be few others to make this number stand out above the others. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)		::::At present, there just aren't two many particularly notable uses of the number twelve. Twelve-times-a-day Man is certainly a notable example, but there seem to be few others to make this number stand out above the others. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::I really don't know what we should do with this page, but I think we should have more than 3 instances. Unlike [[G]], I never noticed the number 12 more so than [[Twelve Times A Day Man]]. I think it should be '''Deleted.''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}

Heimstern Läufer: /* Discussion */ comment

Heimstern Läufer — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:37:54 GMT

Discussion: comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:37, 26 September 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::This article would only be notable if, like the letter [[G]], the number twelve appeared on the website ''all the time''. Such numbers include [[1982]], [[1987]] and [[$11.01\|11.01]]. Compared to these, the number twelve has no such relevance. It's a numerical [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoon]]. If this article is kept, someone might then create [[One]], then someone else might create [[Two]], then [[Three]], then [[Four]], and so forth and where would it all end?! '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)		::This article would only be notable if, like the letter [[G]], the number twelve appeared on the website ''all the time''. Such numbers include [[1982]], [[1987]] and [[$11.01\|11.01]]. Compared to these, the number twelve has no such relevance. It's a numerical [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoon]]. If this article is kept, someone might then create [[One]], then someone else might create [[Two]], then [[Three]], then [[Four]], and so forth and where would it all end?! '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
	:::Hmm... I actually don't know if this should be deleted. I saw like, 3 references to the number twelve in Strong Badia the Free (I noticed at the time but don't remember them now). If we DO keep it, though, it needs a major rewrite. "Appearances Found Only on HRWiki"? For shame! {{User:Compgrl323/sig}} 05:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)		:::Hmm... I actually don't know if this should be deleted. I saw like, 3 references to the number twelve in Strong Badia the Free (I noticed at the time but don't remember them now). If we DO keep it, though, it needs a major rewrite. "Appearances Found Only on HRWiki"? For shame! {{User:Compgrl323/sig}} 05:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::At present, there just aren't two many particularly notable uses of the number twelve. Twelve-times-a-day Man is certainly a notable example, but there seem to be few others to make this number stand out above the others. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Compgrl323: my opinion on twelve

Compgrl323 — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:03:56 GMT

my opinion on twelve

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 26 September 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:i still doubt it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)		:i still doubt it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
	::This article would only be notable if, like the letter [[G]], the number twelve appeared on the website ''all the time''. Such numbers include [[1982]], [[1987]] and [[$11.01\|11.01]]. Compared to these, the number twelve has no such relevance. It's a numerical [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoon]]. If this article is kept, someone might then create [[One]], then someone else might create [[Two]], then [[Three]], then [[Four]], and so forth and where would it all end?! '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)		::This article would only be notable if, like the letter [[G]], the number twelve appeared on the website ''all the time''. Such numbers include [[1982]], [[1987]] and [[$11.01\|11.01]]. Compared to these, the number twelve has no such relevance. It's a numerical [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoon]]. If this article is kept, someone might then create [[One]], then someone else might create [[Two]], then [[Three]], then [[Four]], and so forth and where would it all end?! '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::Hmm... I actually don't know if this should be deleted. I saw like, 3 references to the number twelve in Strong Badia the Free (I noticed at the time but don't remember them now). If we DO keep it, though, it needs a major rewrite. "Appearances Found Only on HRWiki"? For shame! {{User:Compgrl323/sig}} 05:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

The Chort: /* Discussion */ Delete.

The Chort — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:00:42 GMT

Discussion: Delete.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 25 September 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Would it be worth keeping if we only noted [[garage sale]], [[looking old]], and [[fan club]]? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 22:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)		Would it be worth keeping if we only noted [[garage sale]], [[looking old]], and [[fan club]]? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 22:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
	:i still doubt it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)		:i still doubt it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
		+	::This article would only be notable if, like the letter [[G]], the number twelve appeared on the website ''all the time''. Such numbers include [[1982]], [[1987]] and [[$11.01\|11.01]]. Compared to these, the number twelve has no such relevance. It's a numerical [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoon]]. If this article is kept, someone might then create [[One]], then someone else might create [[Two]], then [[Three]], then [[Four]], and so forth and where would it all end?! '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Discussion */ no.

Defender1031 — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:20:20 GMT

Discussion: no.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 24 September 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Trivial, too much so to be notable. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 21:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)		::Trivial, too much so to be notable. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 21:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
	Would it be worth keeping if we only noted [[garage sale]], [[looking old]], and [[fan club]]? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 22:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)		Would it be worth keeping if we only noted [[garage sale]], [[looking old]], and [[fan club]]? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 22:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
		+	:i still doubt it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Bad Bad Guy at 22:00, 24 September 2008

Bad Bad Guy — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:00:24 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 24 September 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I actually agree, thought "poorly punctuated" can be fixed. It seems like a reach to find instances and they have little in common. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)		:I actually agree, thought "poorly punctuated" can be fixed. It seems like a reach to find instances and they have little in common. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
	::Trivial, too much so to be notable. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 21:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)		::Trivial, too much so to be notable. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 21:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
		+	Would it be worth keeping if we only noted [[garage sale]], [[looking old]], and [[fan club]]? {{User:Bad Bad Guy/sig}} 22:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Qermaq: /* Discussion */ no thank you

Qermaq — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:57:45 GMT

Discussion: no thank you

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 24 September 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	We don't need this page. It's poorly punctuated and has no reason to be here. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}		We don't need this page. It's poorly punctuated and has no reason to be here. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}
	:I actually agree, thought "poorly punctuated" can be fixed. It seems like a reach to find instances and they have little in common. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)		:I actually agree, thought "poorly punctuated" can be fixed. It seems like a reach to find instances and they have little in common. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
		+	::Trivial, too much so to be notable. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 21:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: tbd and thought

Defender1031 — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:03:49 GMT

tbd and thought

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 24 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{ttbd}}
		+	== Discussion ==
	We don't need this page. It's poorly punctuated and has no reason to be here. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}		We don't need this page. It's poorly punctuated and has no reason to be here. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}}
		+	:I actually agree, thought "poorly punctuated" can be fixed. It seems like a reach to find instances and they have little in common. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)