Talk:galvanized nails - Revision history

Trey56: and other fix

Trey56 — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:19:12 GMT

and other fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:19, 25 June 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{deletedtalk\|merge=No Hands on Deck!]]}}	+	{{deletedtalk\|merge=No Hands on Deck!}}
	Poor spelling is no reason, ever, to delete an article. Subject not worthy, ok. It is not worthy, it can all be covered in [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		Poor spelling is no reason, ever, to delete an article. Subject not worthy, ok. It is not worthy, it can all be covered in [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	:Agreed, it might be wise to make '''galvanized nails''' link to [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 01:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:Agreed, it might be wise to make '''galvanized nails''' link to [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 01:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Trey56: closed template

Trey56 — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:18:42 GMT

closed template

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 25 June 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{deletedtalk\|merge=No Hands on Deck!]]	+	{{deletedtalk\|merge=No Hands on Deck!]]}}
	Poor spelling is no reason, ever, to delete an article. Subject not worthy, ok. It is not worthy, it can all be covered in [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		Poor spelling is no reason, ever, to delete an article. Subject not worthy, ok. It is not worthy, it can all be covered in [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	:Agreed, it might be wise to make '''galvanized nails''' link to [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 01:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:Agreed, it might be wise to make '''galvanized nails''' link to [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 01:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Trey56: +{{deletedtalk}}, comment.

Trey56 — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:18:10 GMT

+{{deletedtalk}}, comment.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 25 June 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{deletedtalk\|merge=No Hands on Deck!]]
	Poor spelling is no reason, ever, to delete an article. Subject not worthy, ok. It is not worthy, it can all be covered in [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		Poor spelling is no reason, ever, to delete an article. Subject not worthy, ok. It is not worthy, it can all be covered in [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	:Agreed, it might be wise to make '''galvanized nails''' link to [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 01:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:Agreed, it might be wise to make '''galvanized nails''' link to [[No Hands on Deck!]] {{User:Flashfight/sig}} 01:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Line 9:		Line 10:
	::::::::I agree with Loafing and OF: I don't think it's worth the effort to move the page and redirect it since people can just type "galvanized nails" in the search bar and achieve the same effect. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 20:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		::::::::I agree with Loafing and OF: I don't think it's worth the effort to move the page and redirect it since people can just type "galvanized nails" in the search bar and achieve the same effect. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 20:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::::Eh, I just made the redirect. It was quick and easy. Now let's baleet this one. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:::::::::Eh, I just made the redirect. It was quick and easy. Now let's baleet this one. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::Okay, that's fine. I moved the original page there to preserve the page history, and I turned it into a redirect. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Trey56: Talk:galvinized nails moved to Talk:galvanized nails: moving to correct spelling (over redirect to preserve page history)

Trey56 — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:16:06 GMT

Talk:galvinized nails moved to Talk:galvanized nails: moving to correct spelling (over redirect to preserve page history)

← Older revision

Revision as of 03:16, 25 June 2008

Heimstern Läufer: baleet now that it's resolved

Heimstern Läufer — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:52:13 GMT

baleet now that it's resolved

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:52, 24 June 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::::::Why, yes, it does cost money to delete a page. Or create one. Or edit it. Every action on the wiki creates data that needs to be stored. The wiki has to pay for that storage. And every action uses up bandwidth for which we also have to pay. But look at me wasting money by just blubbering away. What I think Heimi really meant was that it does not cost much effort to create or maintain a redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 09:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:::::::Why, yes, it does cost money to delete a page. Or create one. Or edit it. Every action on the wiki creates data that needs to be stored. The wiki has to pay for that storage. And every action uses up bandwidth for which we also have to pay. But look at me wasting money by just blubbering away. What I think Heimi really meant was that it does not cost much effort to create or maintain a redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 09:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	::::::::I agree with Loafing and OF: I don't think it's worth the effort to move the page and redirect it since people can just type "galvanized nails" in the search bar and achieve the same effect. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 20:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		::::::::I agree with Loafing and OF: I don't think it's worth the effort to move the page and redirect it since people can just type "galvanized nails" in the search bar and achieve the same effect. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 20:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::Eh, I just made the redirect. It was quick and easy. Now let's baleet this one. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Trey56: reverted Loafing's edit (all those words were costing us too much money)

Trey56 — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:29:31 GMT

reverted Loafing's edit (all those words were costing us too much money)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 24 June 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::::Redirects are CHEAP? Does it cost money to delete a page? If so, then thats weird. I really don't think we even need to redirect this page (unless it costs to delete). Loafing's right, if there's not a page, search and <s>destroy</s> you'll find what you're lookin' for. {{User:DevonM/sig}} 05:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		::::::Redirects are CHEAP? Does it cost money to delete a page? If so, then thats weird. I really don't think we even need to redirect this page (unless it costs to delete). Loafing's right, if there's not a page, search and <s>destroy</s> you'll find what you're lookin' for. {{User:DevonM/sig}} 05:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::Why, yes, it does cost money to delete a page. Or create one. Or edit it. Every action on the wiki creates data that needs to be stored. The wiki has to pay for that storage. And every action uses up bandwidth for which we also have to pay. But look at me wasting money by just blubbering away. What I think Heimi really meant was that it does not cost much effort to create or maintain a redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 09:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:::::::Why, yes, it does cost money to delete a page. Or create one. Or edit it. Every action on the wiki creates data that needs to be stored. The wiki has to pay for that storage. And every action uses up bandwidth for which we also have to pay. But look at me wasting money by just blubbering away. What I think Heimi really meant was that it does not cost much effort to create or maintain a redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 09:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::::I agree with Loafing and OF: I don't think it's worth the effort to move the page and redirect it since people can just type "galvanized nails" in the search bar and achieve the same effect. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 20:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Loafing: those migs and megs don't come for free

Loafing — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:11:29 GMT

those migs and megs don't come for free

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 24 June 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::::Except that we wouldn't redirect THIS page since it is spelled wrong. We'd have to CREATE [[galvanized nails]] in order to redirect it. I just don't see the point of going to that effort. I say: delete outright. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 03:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:::::Except that we wouldn't redirect THIS page since it is spelled wrong. We'd have to CREATE [[galvanized nails]] in order to redirect it. I just don't see the point of going to that effort. I say: delete outright. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 03:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	::::::Redirects are CHEAP? Does it cost money to delete a page? If so, then thats weird. I really don't think we even need to redirect this page (unless it costs to delete). Loafing's right, if there's not a page, search and <s>destroy</s> you'll find what you're lookin' for. {{User:DevonM/sig}} 05:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		::::::Redirects are CHEAP? Does it cost money to delete a page? If so, then thats weird. I really don't think we even need to redirect this page (unless it costs to delete). Loafing's right, if there's not a page, search and <s>destroy</s> you'll find what you're lookin' for. {{User:DevonM/sig}} 05:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::::Why, yes, it does cost money to delete a page. Or create one. Or edit it. Every action on the wiki creates data that needs to be stored. The wiki has to pay for that storage. And every action uses up bandwidth for which we also have to pay. But look at me wasting money by just blubbering away. What I think Heimi really meant was that it does not cost much effort to create or maintain a redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 09:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

DevonM at 05:05, 24 June 2008

DevonM — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 05:05:53 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:05, 24 June 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::Redirects are cheap, so I see no reason not to go ahead and redirect rather than delete. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		::::Redirects are cheap, so I see no reason not to go ahead and redirect rather than delete. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	:::::Except that we wouldn't redirect THIS page since it is spelled wrong. We'd have to CREATE [[galvanized nails]] in order to redirect it. I just don't see the point of going to that effort. I say: delete outright. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 03:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:::::Except that we wouldn't redirect THIS page since it is spelled wrong. We'd have to CREATE [[galvanized nails]] in order to redirect it. I just don't see the point of going to that effort. I say: delete outright. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 03:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::Redirects are CHEAP? Does it cost money to delete a page? If so, then thats weird. I really don't think we even need to redirect this page (unless it costs to delete). Loafing's right, if there's not a page, search and <s>destroy</s> you'll find what you're lookin' for. {{User:DevonM/sig}} 05:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

OptimisticFool: Nah.. delete.

OptimisticFool — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:38:11 GMT

Nah.. delete.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 24 June 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::Agreed. I was going to post something saying that but you beat me. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:::Agreed. I was going to post something saying that but you beat me. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	::::Redirects are cheap, so I see no reason not to go ahead and redirect rather than delete. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		::::Redirects are cheap, so I see no reason not to go ahead and redirect rather than delete. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::Except that we wouldn't redirect THIS page since it is spelled wrong. We'd have to CREATE [[galvanized nails]] in order to redirect it. I just don't see the point of going to that effort. I say: delete outright. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 03:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: redirects are cheap

Heimstern Läufer — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:57:37 GMT

redirects are cheap

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 24 June 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I don't see the need to create the "galvanized nails" redirect. We won't need it in any article, and it's not like [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/Special:Search?ns0=1&search=galvanized%20nails searching for it] is very complicated. This can be outright deleted.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		::I don't see the need to create the "galvanized nails" redirect. We won't need it in any article, and it's not like [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/Special:Search?ns0=1&search=galvanized%20nails searching for it] is very complicated. This can be outright deleted.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	:::Agreed. I was going to post something saying that but you beat me. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:::Agreed. I was going to post something saying that but you beat me. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::Redirects are cheap, so I see no reason not to go ahead and redirect rather than delete. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)