Talk:comic - Revision history

Free: +{{featuredarticle}}

Free — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:02:04 GMT

+{{featuredarticle}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:02, 13 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{featuredarticle}}
		+
	== Girls' names ==		== Girls' names ==
	"*The friends refered to in the email are Virginia Quarles, Joy Phillips, Kristen Schaeffer, and Jennifer Skates, all of Kingsport, Tennessee."		"*The friends refered to in the email are Virginia Quarles, Joy Phillips, Kristen Schaeffer, and Jennifer Skates, all of Kingsport, Tennessee."

The McArby: /**/Rally's and Checkers

The McArby — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:54:25 GMT

: Rally's and Checkers

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 9 March 2010
Line 78:		Line 78:
	Since the article does mention "You Stupid Assholes" in Real-World References, shouldn't it have <nowiki>{{coverscontent}}</nowiki> in the article? --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233\|75.5.176.233]] 02:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)		Since the article does mention "You Stupid Assholes" in Real-World References, shouldn't it have <nowiki>{{coverscontent}}</nowiki> in the article? --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233\|75.5.176.233]] 02:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
	:No, I don't think we should use that template anywhere on the site, as I explain [[Template talk:coverscontent\|here]]. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 03:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC)		:No, I don't think we should use that template anywhere on the site, as I explain [[Template talk:coverscontent\|here]]. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 03:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Rally's and Checkers ==
		+
		+	Accorfing to the article -"Checkers, Rally's, and Sonic are all fast food chains that specialize in drive-in style dining. Checkers and Rally's are part of the same company after both chains merged operations in 1999, although the combined company continues to use both names."
		+
		+	is this still true? all the Rally's in my area have become checkers, I just want to know if it's still like this before I remove it (which I likely wont) {{User:The McArby/Sig}} 21:54, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

128.103.10.17: /* Closed STUFF */ Important question

128.103.10.17 — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:46:44 GMT

Closed STUFF: Important question

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:46, 9 December 2008
Line 55:		Line 55:
	*'''Only accept Naked City part'''. It's a famous line. Strong Bad inflects it in the same way. I can't believe everyone thinks that this has to do with PSA's. <small><tt>[[User:Homestar Coder\|<span style="color:#8B0000;">Aurora the Homestar Coder</span>]]</tt></small> 07:25, 20 May 2005 (UTC)		*'''Only accept Naked City part'''. It's a famous line. Strong Bad inflects it in the same way. I can't believe everyone thinks that this has to do with PSA's. <small><tt>[[User:Homestar Coder\|<span style="color:#8B0000;">Aurora the Homestar Coder</span>]]</tt></small> 07:25, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
	*'''Revise and Accept.''' Include both. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:29, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)		*'''Revise and Accept.''' Include both. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:29, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	So, part of this fact was apparently accepted? I can't tell which part, though. And none of it seems to appear on the page, currently. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.17\|128.103.10.17]] 19:46, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

	== Jumping Jack Contest Music ==		== Jumping Jack Contest Music ==

It's dot com: /* Use of coverscontent? */ nope

It's dot com — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:36:10 GMT

Use of coverscontent?: nope

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:36, 9 December 2008
Line 75:		Line 75:

	Since the article does mention "You Stupid Assholes" in Real-World References, shouldn't it have <nowiki>{{coverscontent}}</nowiki> in the article? --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233\|75.5.176.233]] 02:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)		Since the article does mention "You Stupid Assholes" in Real-World References, shouldn't it have <nowiki>{{coverscontent}}</nowiki> in the article? --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233\|75.5.176.233]] 02:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
		+	:No, I don't think we should use that template anywhere on the site, as I explain [[Template talk:coverscontent\|here]]. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 03:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

75.5.176.233: /* Easter Egg Conversation */ You may be onto something.

75.5.176.233 — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 02:20:41 GMT

Easter Egg Conversation: You may be onto something.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 8 December 2008
Line 64:		Line 64:
	== Easter Egg Conversation ==		== Easter Egg Conversation ==

-	Does anyone else think that the conversation is probably between two clerks rather than a clerk and a customer? I kind of thought that that part was meant to homage High Fidelity, and if that were the case, it would most likely be between two clerks.	+	Does anyone else think that the conversation is probably between two clerks rather than a clerk and a customer? I kind of thought that that part was meant to homage High Fidelity, and if that were the case, it would most likely be between two clerks. {{unsigned\|24.130.171.42\|19:23, 4 April 2006 (UTC)}}
		+	:You know, that is a good question. How do we know that the conversation is between a Clerk and a Customer? In fact, I think who says who should be flipped around, and even then how do we know they're customer and clerk? If it is said by The Brothers Chaps that it's supposed to be that way, someone please cite it. --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233\|75.5.176.233]] 02:20, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

	== Kristina ==		== Kristina ==

75.5.176.233: /**/Use of coverscontent?

75.5.176.233 — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 02:12:11 GMT

: Use of coverscontent?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 8 December 2008
Line 70:		Line 70:
	We know that Kristina is so-and-so, so i think we should put something in the article on that. {{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}}		We know that Kristina is so-and-so, so i think we should put something in the article on that. {{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}}
	:We're one step ahead of you, Martyo. It's already mentioned on [[So and So]]. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)		:We're one step ahead of you, Martyo. It's already mentioned on [[So and So]]. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Use of coverscontent? ==
		+
		+	Since the article does mention "You Stupid Assholes" in Real-World References, shouldn't it have <nowiki>{{coverscontent}}</nowiki> in the article? --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233\|75.5.176.233]] 02:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

JCM: /* Why is there a curse word on the article page? */ I wonder if it's nice to insult myself

JCM — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:16:18 GMT

Why is there a curse word on the article page?: I wonder if it's nice to insult myself

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 1 September 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:At the very least there should be a warning for those who don't expect to find something like this. The fact that TBC removed it from the DVD is somewhat indicative that they didn't intend to include that. The fact that they haven't fixed the original .SWF confuses me a little (since it would serve as some sort of contraindication to my theory). --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 04:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)		:At the very least there should be a warning for those who don't expect to find something like this. The fact that TBC removed it from the DVD is somewhat indicative that they didn't intend to include that. The fact that they haven't fixed the original .SWF confuses me a little (since it would serve as some sort of contraindication to my theory). --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 04:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
	::All a warning would do would be to draw attention to itself. Like, don't read my signature right ''here'': [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 05:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)		::All a warning would do would be to draw attention to itself. Like, don't read my signature right ''here'': [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 05:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
-	:::And then they'd be ~~dissapointed~~ in the end. So, no point. {{User:Hrjcm/sig}} 14:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)	+	:::And then they'd be disappointed in the end. So, no point. {{User:Hrjcm/sig}} 14:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

	== Possible Ref? ==		== Possible Ref? ==

JCM: /* Why is there a curse word on the article page? */

JCM — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:15:19 GMT

Why is there a curse word on the article page?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 1 September 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:At the very least there should be a warning for those who don't expect to find something like this. The fact that TBC removed it from the DVD is somewhat indicative that they didn't intend to include that. The fact that they haven't fixed the original .SWF confuses me a little (since it would serve as some sort of contraindication to my theory). --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 04:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)		:At the very least there should be a warning for those who don't expect to find something like this. The fact that TBC removed it from the DVD is somewhat indicative that they didn't intend to include that. The fact that they haven't fixed the original .SWF confuses me a little (since it would serve as some sort of contraindication to my theory). --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 04:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
	::All a warning would do would be to draw attention to itself. Like, don't read my signature right ''here'': [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 05:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)		::All a warning would do would be to draw attention to itself. Like, don't read my signature right ''here'': [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 05:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::And then they'd be dissapointed in the end. So, no point. {{User:Hrjcm/sig}} 14:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

	== Possible Ref? ==		== Possible Ref? ==

It's dot com: /* Why is there a curse word on the article page? */ comment

It's dot com — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 05:09:31 GMT

Why is there a curse word on the article page?: comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 1 September 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	They swear when?! Who?!		They swear when?! Who?!
	:At the very least there should be a warning for those who don't expect to find something like this. The fact that TBC removed it from the DVD is somewhat indicative that they didn't intend to include that. The fact that they haven't fixed the original .SWF confuses me a little (since it would serve as some sort of contraindication to my theory). --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 04:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)		:At the very least there should be a warning for those who don't expect to find something like this. The fact that TBC removed it from the DVD is somewhat indicative that they didn't intend to include that. The fact that they haven't fixed the original .SWF confuses me a little (since it would serve as some sort of contraindication to my theory). --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 04:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
		+	::All a warning would do would be to draw attention to itself. Like, don't read my signature right ''here'': [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 05:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

	== Possible Ref? ==		== Possible Ref? ==

Stux: /* Why is there a curse word on the article page? */ comment

Stux — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:01:19 GMT

Why is there a curse word on the article page?: comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:01, 1 September 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:

	They swear when?! Who?!		They swear when?! Who?!
		+	:At the very least there should be a warning for those who don't expect to find something like this. The fact that TBC removed it from the DVD is somewhat indicative that they didn't intend to include that. The fact that they haven't fixed the original .SWF confuses me a little (since it would serve as some sort of contraindication to my theory). --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 04:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

	== Possible Ref? ==		== Possible Ref? ==