Talk:The Brothers Chaps' Fansite Acknowledgments - Revision history

Invisible Robot Fish: /* Wiki exclusives */ +missing word

Invisible Robot Fish — Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:44:26 GMT

Wiki exclusives: +missing word

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 26 October 2011
Line 131:		Line 131:
	::Sending unused transcripts to the site isn't that much different than their recording of sound clips for Burning Horizons and the-coolest-stuff-ever in my eyes. And I think one usually has to acknowledge something in order to send anything to it. I'll re-add PQPS along with the other two if there's no opposition. {{User:Free/sig}} 21:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)		::Sending unused transcripts to the site isn't that much different than their recording of sound clips for Burning Horizons and the-coolest-stuff-ever in my eyes. And I think one usually has to acknowledge something in order to send anything to it. I'll re-add PQPS along with the other two if there's no opposition. {{User:Free/sig}} 21:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
	::: You raise a good point, Free. One could argue, though, that the sound clips they recorded mention the websites by name, which the exclusive scripts don't. But, hey, as long as all three of them are there, I'm fine with it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)		::: You raise a good point, Free. One could argue, though, that the sound clips they recorded mention the websites by name, which the exclusive scripts don't. But, hey, as long as all three of them are there, I'm fine with it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
-	::::So, should I add a section called wiki-exclusives to this page then and the three at the top? {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 10:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)	+	::::So, should I add a section called wiki-exclusives to this page then and add the three at the top? {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 10:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Invisible Robot Fish: /* Wiki exclusives */ question for the group

Invisible Robot Fish — Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:43:44 GMT

Wiki exclusives: question for the group

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:43, 26 October 2011
Line 131:		Line 131:
	::Sending unused transcripts to the site isn't that much different than their recording of sound clips for Burning Horizons and the-coolest-stuff-ever in my eyes. And I think one usually has to acknowledge something in order to send anything to it. I'll re-add PQPS along with the other two if there's no opposition. {{User:Free/sig}} 21:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)		::Sending unused transcripts to the site isn't that much different than their recording of sound clips for Burning Horizons and the-coolest-stuff-ever in my eyes. And I think one usually has to acknowledge something in order to send anything to it. I'll re-add PQPS along with the other two if there's no opposition. {{User:Free/sig}} 21:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
	::: You raise a good point, Free. One could argue, though, that the sound clips they recorded mention the websites by name, which the exclusive scripts don't. But, hey, as long as all three of them are there, I'm fine with it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)		::: You raise a good point, Free. One could argue, though, that the sound clips they recorded mention the websites by name, which the exclusive scripts don't. But, hey, as long as all three of them are there, I'm fine with it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
		+	::::So, should I add a section called wiki-exclusives to this page then and the three at the top? {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 10:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Jay: /* Wiki exclusives */ And, no, you're not Hitler. ;)

Jay — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:33:43 GMT

Wiki exclusives: And, no, you're not Hitler. ;)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 10 October 2011
Line 130:		Line 130:
	:I don't see any reason that we shouldn't. I think the only reason that we haven't is that we forgot. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC		:I don't see any reason that we shouldn't. I think the only reason that we haven't is that we forgot. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC
	::Sending unused transcripts to the site isn't that much different than their recording of sound clips for Burning Horizons and the-coolest-stuff-ever in my eyes. And I think one usually has to acknowledge something in order to send anything to it. I'll re-add PQPS along with the other two if there's no opposition. {{User:Free/sig}} 21:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)		::Sending unused transcripts to the site isn't that much different than their recording of sound clips for Burning Horizons and the-coolest-stuff-ever in my eyes. And I think one usually has to acknowledge something in order to send anything to it. I'll re-add PQPS along with the other two if there's no opposition. {{User:Free/sig}} 21:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
		+	::: You raise a good point, Free. One could argue, though, that the sound clips they recorded mention the websites by name, which the exclusive scripts don't. But, hey, as long as all three of them are there, I'm fine with it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Free: /* Wiki exclusives */ wait, am I Hitler now?

Free — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:14:01 GMT

Wiki exclusives: wait, am I Hitler now?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 10 October 2011
Line 128:		Line 128:

	TBC have given the Wiki several exclusive scripts, such as [[Soap Box Doiby]], [[Sbemail 136 Alternate Versions]], and [[Peasant's Quest Proposed Sequels]]. Do those count as fansite acknowledgments? I'm neutral, but took it to talk so we could discuss it, since PQPS was added today, but the others never were. Seriously, I'm Switzerland here. I'm Concessionstan. I don't care one way or another. I just want consensus. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)		TBC have given the Wiki several exclusive scripts, such as [[Soap Box Doiby]], [[Sbemail 136 Alternate Versions]], and [[Peasant's Quest Proposed Sequels]]. Do those count as fansite acknowledgments? I'm neutral, but took it to talk so we could discuss it, since PQPS was added today, but the others never were. Seriously, I'm Switzerland here. I'm Concessionstan. I don't care one way or another. I just want consensus. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
-	:I don't see any reason that we shouldn't. I think the only reason that we haven't is that we forgot. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)	+	:I don't see any reason that we shouldn't. I think the only reason that we haven't is that we forgot. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC
		+	::Sending unused transcripts to the site isn't that much different than their recording of sound clips for Burning Horizons and the-coolest-stuff-ever in my eyes. And I think one usually has to acknowledge something in order to send anything to it. I'll re-add PQPS along with the other two if there's no opposition. {{User:Free/sig}} 21:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

It's dot com: /* Wiki exclusives */ why not

It's dot com — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:12:11 GMT

Wiki exclusives: why not

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:12, 10 October 2011
Line 128:		Line 128:

	TBC have given the Wiki several exclusive scripts, such as [[Soap Box Doiby]], [[Sbemail 136 Alternate Versions]], and [[Peasant's Quest Proposed Sequels]]. Do those count as fansite acknowledgments? I'm neutral, but took it to talk so we could discuss it, since PQPS was added today, but the others never were. Seriously, I'm Switzerland here. I'm Concessionstan. I don't care one way or another. I just want consensus. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)		TBC have given the Wiki several exclusive scripts, such as [[Soap Box Doiby]], [[Sbemail 136 Alternate Versions]], and [[Peasant's Quest Proposed Sequels]]. Do those count as fansite acknowledgments? I'm neutral, but took it to talk so we could discuss it, since PQPS was added today, but the others never were. Seriously, I'm Switzerland here. I'm Concessionstan. I don't care one way or another. I just want consensus. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
		+	:I don't see any reason that we shouldn't. I think the only reason that we haven't is that we forgot. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Jay: /**/Wiki exclusives

Jay — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:45:15 GMT

: Wiki exclusives

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 10 October 2011
Line 124:		Line 124:
	:::Actually, I didn't see it listed when this article was last edited (before I posted this talk), sorry if it sounded like it was "to be taken off" sounding. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 19:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)		:::Actually, I didn't see it listed when this article was last edited (before I posted this talk), sorry if it sounded like it was "to be taken off" sounding. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 19:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
	::::Ah, that makes sense. Yeah, I kinda had to hunt for it a bit myself. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:22, 10 August 2010 (UTC)		::::Ah, that makes sense. Yeah, I kinda had to hunt for it a bit myself. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:22, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Wiki exclusives ==
		+
		+	TBC have given the Wiki several exclusive scripts, such as [[Soap Box Doiby]], [[Sbemail 136 Alternate Versions]], and [[Peasant's Quest Proposed Sequels]]. Do those count as fansite acknowledgments? I'm neutral, but took it to talk so we could discuss it, since PQPS was added today, but the others never were. Seriously, I'm Switzerland here. I'm Concessionstan. I don't care one way or another. I just want consensus. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Jay: /* Homestar Runner Wiki is credited to in "Special Thanks" in SBCG4AP... */

Jay — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:22:07 GMT

Homestar Runner Wiki is credited to in "Special Thanks" in SBCG4AP...

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 10 August 2010
Line 123:		Line 123:
	::DeFender has the right idea. TBC may not have programmed the game, but they had to license it, give their approval, and naturally Matt had to do the voices, too! Suffice to say that they were intertwined with the game's production enough that, unless we have a good reason to believe they had nothing to do with that credit (and we don't), it should stay on this page. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)		::DeFender has the right idea. TBC may not have programmed the game, but they had to license it, give their approval, and naturally Matt had to do the voices, too! Suffice to say that they were intertwined with the game's production enough that, unless we have a good reason to believe they had nothing to do with that credit (and we don't), it should stay on this page. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
	:::Actually, I didn't see it listed when this article was last edited (before I posted this talk), sorry if it sounded like it was "to be taken off" sounding. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 19:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)		:::Actually, I didn't see it listed when this article was last edited (before I posted this talk), sorry if it sounded like it was "to be taken off" sounding. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 19:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
		+	::::Ah, that makes sense. Yeah, I kinda had to hunt for it a bit myself. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:22, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

ColdReactive: /* Homestar Runner Wiki is credited to in "Special Thanks" in SBCG4AP... */

ColdReactive — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:48:44 GMT

Homestar Runner Wiki is credited to in "Special Thanks" in SBCG4AP...

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 10 August 2010
Line 122:		Line 122:
	:So what? You saying TBC had nothing to do with it because it was produced by telltale? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)		:So what? You saying TBC had nothing to do with it because it was produced by telltale? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
	::DeFender has the right idea. TBC may not have programmed the game, but they had to license it, give their approval, and naturally Matt had to do the voices, too! Suffice to say that they were intertwined with the game's production enough that, unless we have a good reason to believe they had nothing to do with that credit (and we don't), it should stay on this page. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)		::DeFender has the right idea. TBC may not have programmed the game, but they had to license it, give their approval, and naturally Matt had to do the voices, too! Suffice to say that they were intertwined with the game's production enough that, unless we have a good reason to believe they had nothing to do with that credit (and we don't), it should stay on this page. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
-	:::Actually, I didn't see it listed when this article was last edited, sorry if it sounded like it was "to be taken off" sounding. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 19:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)	+	:::Actually, I didn't see it listed when this article was last edited (before I posted this talk), sorry if it sounded like it was "to be taken off" sounding. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 19:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

ColdReactive: /* Homestar Runner Wiki is credited to in "Special Thanks" in SBCG4AP... */ reply

ColdReactive — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:48:24 GMT

Homestar Runner Wiki is credited to in "Special Thanks" in SBCG4AP...: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 10 August 2010
Line 122:		Line 122:
	:So what? You saying TBC had nothing to do with it because it was produced by telltale? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)		:So what? You saying TBC had nothing to do with it because it was produced by telltale? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
	::DeFender has the right idea. TBC may not have programmed the game, but they had to license it, give their approval, and naturally Matt had to do the voices, too! Suffice to say that they were intertwined with the game's production enough that, unless we have a good reason to believe they had nothing to do with that credit (and we don't), it should stay on this page. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)		::DeFender has the right idea. TBC may not have programmed the game, but they had to license it, give their approval, and naturally Matt had to do the voices, too! Suffice to say that they were intertwined with the game's production enough that, unless we have a good reason to believe they had nothing to do with that credit (and we don't), it should stay on this page. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
		+	:::Actually, I didn't see it listed when this article was last edited, sorry if it sounded like it was "to be taken off" sounding. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 19:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Jay: /* Homestar Runner Wiki is credited to in "Special Thanks" in SBCG4AP... */

Jay — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:02:16 GMT

Homestar Runner Wiki is credited to in "Special Thanks" in SBCG4AP...

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 10 August 2010
Line 121:		Line 121:
	However, should this be listed on this article? It's a telltale game. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 13:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)		However, should this be listed on this article? It's a telltale game. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 13:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
	:So what? You saying TBC had nothing to do with it because it was produced by telltale? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)		:So what? You saying TBC had nothing to do with it because it was produced by telltale? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
		+	::DeFender has the right idea. TBC may not have programmed the game, but they had to license it, give their approval, and naturally Matt had to do the voices, too! Suffice to say that they were intertwined with the game's production enough that, unless we have a good reason to believe they had nothing to do with that credit (and we don't), it should stay on this page. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)