Talk:Tears - Revision history

Lapper: link change

Lapper — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:29:33 GMT

link change

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 22 March 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::: So, you're saying there is no Spoon? (Seriously, '''Delete''' as irrelevant.) {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		::::: So, you're saying there is no Spoon? (Seriously, '''Delete''' as irrelevant.) {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

-	I've just had a crazy idea. I think an article on [[Crying (running gag)]] would be better than one on Tears. It would avoid Qermaq's Spoon problem and have more meaningful and useful content. We've [[Strong Bad Smiling\|got]] [[Strong Sad Smiling\|pages]] [[Strong Mad Smiling\|on]] [[The Cheat Smiling \|smiling]] so why not an article on crying? Most of the stuff on Tears can be incorporated into the article too. Of course, it would need a different title to avoid confusion with the Strong Bad Email [[crying]]. So...what does everyone think? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)	+	I've just had a crazy idea. I think an article on [[Crying\|Crying (running gag)]] would be better than one on Tears. It would avoid Qermaq's Spoon problem and have more meaningful and useful content. We've [[Strong Bad Smiling\|got]] [[Strong Sad Smiling\|pages]] [[Strong Mad Smiling\|on]] [[The Cheat Smiling \|smiling]] so why not an article on crying? Most of the stuff on Tears can be incorporated into the article too. Of course, it would need a different title to avoid confusion with the Strong Bad Email [[crying]]. So...what does everyone think? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
	:Capital idea! Should we start with a name change of the Tears page, and then edit appropriately? Since we will be using most of the same material, there's no point [[HRWiki: Once and Only Once\|reinventing the wheel]]... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 19:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		:Capital idea! Should we start with a name change of the Tears page, and then edit appropriately? Since we will be using most of the same material, there's no point [[HRWiki: Once and Only Once\|reinventing the wheel]]... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 19:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

DorianGray: Change template

DorianGray — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:29:04 GMT

Change template

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 22 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}

	A lot of these are from commentaries and interviews, which we tend not to include on pages such as this. In addition, I don't find this notable. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)		A lot of these are from commentaries and interviews, which we tend not to include on pages such as this. In addition, I don't find this notable. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Sam the Man at 21:26, 8 September 2007

Sam the Man — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:26:58 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 8 September 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:

	::::I'm just going to take that to be discussed thing off because nothings happening and there really is no reason why this should be deleted anyway.--{{User:SantanaHomerunner/sig}} 21:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)		::::I'm just going to take that to be discussed thing off because nothings happening and there really is no reason why this should be deleted anyway.--{{User:SantanaHomerunner/sig}} 21:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::::Let a sysop take off the TBD sign. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 21:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Defender1031: umm... i beg to differ, i see consensus to delteat

Defender1031 — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:25:49 GMT

umm... i beg to differ, i see consensus to delteat

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 8 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{ttbd}}
		+
	A lot of these are from commentaries and interviews, which we tend not to include on pages such as this. In addition, I don't find this notable. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)		A lot of these are from commentaries and interviews, which we tend not to include on pages such as this. In addition, I don't find this notable. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

SantanaHomerunner at 21:17, 8 September 2007

SantanaHomerunner — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:17:52 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 8 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{ttbd}}~~
-
	A lot of these are from commentaries and interviews, which we tend not to include on pages such as this. In addition, I don't find this notable. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)		A lot of these are from commentaries and interviews, which we tend not to include on pages such as this. In addition, I don't find this notable. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

SantanaHomerunner at 21:17, 8 September 2007

SantanaHomerunner — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:17:36 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 8 September 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::As a side note, I wonder if a page like [[Strong Bad Smiling]] is notable, but I'll start that discussion on that page. So, I agree with the original opinions to '''delete''' this page. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)		::As a side note, I wonder if a page like [[Strong Bad Smiling]] is notable, but I'll start that discussion on that page. So, I agree with the original opinions to '''delete''' this page. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
	:::I took the liberty of taking out anything relating to crying. There are still enough appearances. --{{User:SantanaHomerunner/sig}} 18:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)		:::I took the liberty of taking out anything relating to crying. There are still enough appearances. --{{User:SantanaHomerunner/sig}} 18:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::::I'm just going to take that to be discussed thing off because nothings happening and there really is no reason why this should be deleted anyway.--{{User:SantanaHomerunner/sig}} 21:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

SantanaHomerunner at 18:58, 4 September 2007

SantanaHomerunner — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:58:53 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 4 September 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:

	::As a side note, I wonder if a page like [[Strong Bad Smiling]] is notable, but I'll start that discussion on that page. So, I agree with the original opinions to '''delete''' this page. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)		::As a side note, I wonder if a page like [[Strong Bad Smiling]] is notable, but I'll start that discussion on that page. So, I agree with the original opinions to '''delete''' this page. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::I took the liberty of taking out anything relating to crying. There are still enough appearances. --{{User:SantanaHomerunner/sig}} 18:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Trey56: my thoughts

Trey56 — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:56:40 GMT

my thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 31 August 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	I've just had a crazy idea. I think an article on [[Crying (running gag)]] would be better than one on Tears. It would avoid Qermaq's Spoon problem and have more meaningful and useful content. We've [[Strong Bad Smiling\|got]] [[Strong Sad Smiling\|pages]] [[Strong Mad Smiling\|on]] [[The Cheat Smiling \|smiling]] so why not an article on crying? Most of the stuff on Tears can be incorporated into the article too. Of course, it would need a different title to avoid confusion with the Strong Bad Email [[crying]]. So...what does everyone think? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		I've just had a crazy idea. I think an article on [[Crying (running gag)]] would be better than one on Tears. It would avoid Qermaq's Spoon problem and have more meaningful and useful content. We've [[Strong Bad Smiling\|got]] [[Strong Sad Smiling\|pages]] [[Strong Mad Smiling\|on]] [[The Cheat Smiling \|smiling]] so why not an article on crying? Most of the stuff on Tears can be incorporated into the article too. Of course, it would need a different title to avoid confusion with the Strong Bad Email [[crying]]. So...what does everyone think? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
	:Capital idea! Should we start with a name change of the Tears page, and then edit appropriately? Since we will be using most of the same material, there's no point [[HRWiki: Once and Only Once\|reinventing the wheel]]... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 19:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		:Capital idea! Should we start with a name change of the Tears page, and then edit appropriately? Since we will be using most of the same material, there's no point [[HRWiki: Once and Only Once\|reinventing the wheel]]... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 19:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::I don't see why the page would be much different under the different title, though maybe I'm missing something. For the most part, any time there's crying, there are tears. Also, for something to be a "running gag", the instances have to be related to each other. In this case, I'm not sure that they are.
		+
		+	::As a side note, I wonder if a page like [[Strong Bad Smiling]] is notable, but I'll start that discussion on that page. So, I agree with the original opinions to '''delete''' this page. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Wbwolf: Brilliant!

Wbwolf — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:52:02 GMT

Brilliant!

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:52, 21 August 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:

	I've just had a crazy idea. I think an article on [[Crying (running gag)]] would be better than one on Tears. It would avoid Qermaq's Spoon problem and have more meaningful and useful content. We've [[Strong Bad Smiling\|got]] [[Strong Sad Smiling\|pages]] [[Strong Mad Smiling\|on]] [[The Cheat Smiling \|smiling]] so why not an article on crying? Most of the stuff on Tears can be incorporated into the article too. Of course, it would need a different title to avoid confusion with the Strong Bad Email [[crying]]. So...what does everyone think? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		I've just had a crazy idea. I think an article on [[Crying (running gag)]] would be better than one on Tears. It would avoid Qermaq's Spoon problem and have more meaningful and useful content. We've [[Strong Bad Smiling\|got]] [[Strong Sad Smiling\|pages]] [[Strong Mad Smiling\|on]] [[The Cheat Smiling \|smiling]] so why not an article on crying? Most of the stuff on Tears can be incorporated into the article too. Of course, it would need a different title to avoid confusion with the Strong Bad Email [[crying]]. So...what does everyone think? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Capital idea! Should we start with a name change of the Tears page, and then edit appropriately? Since we will be using most of the same material, there's no point [[HRWiki: Once and Only Once\|reinventing the wheel]]... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 19:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

The Chort: Why not a page on Crying (running gag)?

The Chort — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:02:40 GMT

Why not a page on Crying (running gag)?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 21 August 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::::If a spoon apears in three or more different unrelated toons, we do not then make a Spoon page. This here is a Spoon page. It's collecting examples of normalcy in the toon and touting it as "wow, we got 3 toons with spoons!" Well, you'd ''expect'' to have spoons show up a few times in a few hundred toons, no? The noting of spoons, or tears, is unnecessary, as one would expect them to appear from time to time. '''Delete'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 07:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)		::::If a spoon apears in three or more different unrelated toons, we do not then make a Spoon page. This here is a Spoon page. It's collecting examples of normalcy in the toon and touting it as "wow, we got 3 toons with spoons!" Well, you'd ''expect'' to have spoons show up a few times in a few hundred toons, no? The noting of spoons, or tears, is unnecessary, as one would expect them to appear from time to time. '''Delete'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 07:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
	::::: So, you're saying there is no Spoon? (Seriously, '''Delete''' as irrelevant.) {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		::::: So, you're saying there is no Spoon? (Seriously, '''Delete''' as irrelevant.) {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	I've just had a crazy idea. I think an article on [[Crying (running gag)]] would be better than one on Tears. It would avoid Qermaq's Spoon problem and have more meaningful and useful content. We've [[Strong Bad Smiling\|got]] [[Strong Sad Smiling\|pages]] [[Strong Mad Smiling\|on]] [[The Cheat Smiling \|smiling]] so why not an article on crying? Most of the stuff on Tears can be incorporated into the article too. Of course, it would need a different title to avoid confusion with the Strong Bad Email [[crying]]. So...what does everyone think? {{User:The Chort/sig}} 15:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)