Talk:Stylized Text on Strong Bad's Computers - Revision history

Tenerence Love: moved Talk:Special Text in Strong Bad Emails to Talk:Stylized Text on Strong Bad's Computers: Better title.

Tenerence Love — Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:11:59 GMT

moved Talk:Special Text in Strong Bad Emails to Talk:Stylized Text on Strong Bad's Computers: Better title.

← Older revision

Revision as of 01:11, 22 March 2012

Jay: /* ASCII Art */

Jay — Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:06:43 GMT

ASCII Art

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 26 February 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:

	The "e email cummings" thing from [[rated]] was recently added to the page, which i removed since the text isn't stylized, and can be done with clever use of spaces. It was put back because "it seems like such cleverness belongs on this page; especially since preTTy starts higher than you're ends, and the er is above the v in clever". I must disagree. Including this opens the door for pretty much every instance of ascii art which ever appeared, since most of those don't have the text perfectly aligned either. We already have a page on [[ASCII art]], which is a different sort of joke, and everything fits nicely there. Such cleverness belongs on a DIFFERENT page, not this one. I've added it there and removed it from here. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)		The "e email cummings" thing from [[rated]] was recently added to the page, which i removed since the text isn't stylized, and can be done with clever use of spaces. It was put back because "it seems like such cleverness belongs on this page; especially since preTTy starts higher than you're ends, and the er is above the v in clever". I must disagree. Including this opens the door for pretty much every instance of ascii art which ever appeared, since most of those don't have the text perfectly aligned either. We already have a page on [[ASCII art]], which is a different sort of joke, and everything fits nicely there. Such cleverness belongs on a DIFFERENT page, not this one. I've added it there and removed it from here. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
		+	: I dunno, I think it's kind of a reach to call that "ASCII art". At the same time, it's still the same font and point size as normal... --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Defender1031: /**/ASCII Art

Defender1031 — Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:27:46 GMT

: ASCII Art

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 26 February 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	I like neither the "special text" part not the "strong bad emails" part of the title. What makes text "special"... The fact that it's '''stylized''' beyond that which a console-based OS is generally capable of. On that note, it's not really about the appearances in the emails, as i don't think that if there is a time where it happens in something other than an email, we would or should exclude it from this page. My thought is to rename this page '''Stylized Text on Strong Bad's Computers'''. What do people think? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)		I like neither the "special text" part not the "strong bad emails" part of the title. What makes text "special"... The fact that it's '''stylized''' beyond that which a console-based OS is generally capable of. On that note, it's not really about the appearances in the emails, as i don't think that if there is a time where it happens in something other than an email, we would or should exclude it from this page. My thought is to rename this page '''Stylized Text on Strong Bad's Computers'''. What do people think? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
	:I especially like the second part, about the computers. I like the first part okay. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 03:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)		:I especially like the second part, about the computers. I like the first part okay. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 03:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	== ASCII Art ==
		+
		+	The "e email cummings" thing from [[rated]] was recently added to the page, which i removed since the text isn't stylized, and can be done with clever use of spaces. It was put back because "it seems like such cleverness belongs on this page; especially since preTTy starts higher than you're ends, and the er is above the v in clever". I must disagree. Including this opens the door for pretty much every instance of ascii art which ever appeared, since most of those don't have the text perfectly aligned either. We already have a page on [[ASCII art]], which is a different sort of joke, and everything fits nicely there. Such cleverness belongs on a DIFFERENT page, not this one. I've added it there and removed it from here. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

It's dot com: /* Name */ reply

It's dot com — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:49:21 GMT

Name: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 24 February 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I like neither the "special text" part not the "strong bad emails" part of the title. What makes text "special"... The fact that it's '''stylized''' beyond that which a console-based OS is generally capable of. On that note, it's not really about the appearances in the emails, as i don't think that if there is a time where it happens in something other than an email, we would or should exclude it from this page. My thought is to rename this page '''Stylized Text on Strong Bad's Computers'''. What do people think? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)		I like neither the "special text" part not the "strong bad emails" part of the title. What makes text "special"... The fact that it's '''stylized''' beyond that which a console-based OS is generally capable of. On that note, it's not really about the appearances in the emails, as i don't think that if there is a time where it happens in something other than an email, we would or should exclude it from this page. My thought is to rename this page '''Stylized Text on Strong Bad's Computers'''. What do people think? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
		+	:I especially like the second part, about the computers. I like the first part okay. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 03:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Defender1031: /**/Name

Defender1031 — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:18:54 GMT

: Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 24 February 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I have to add my vote for '''keep''' as well. Some of them may be listed on [[Strong Bad's Computers Surpassing Their Assumed Capabilities]], but this is really a separate sub-occurrence. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)		::I have to add my vote for '''keep''' as well. Some of them may be listed on [[Strong Bad's Computers Surpassing Their Assumed Capabilities]], but this is really a separate sub-occurrence. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
	:::I think it's interesting enough to '''keep'''. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)		:::I think it's interesting enough to '''keep'''. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Name ==
		+
		+	I like neither the "special text" part not the "strong bad emails" part of the title. What makes text "special"... The fact that it's '''stylized''' beyond that which a console-based OS is generally capable of. On that note, it's not really about the appearances in the emails, as i don't think that if there is a time where it happens in something other than an email, we would or should exclude it from this page. My thought is to rename this page '''Stylized Text on Strong Bad's Computers'''. What do people think? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

It's dot com: this discussion was started before the article had a chance to develop; now that it has, and there seems to be support for it, I'm removing the tag; feel free to continue the discussion, though

It's dot com — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:17:35 GMT

this discussion was started before the article had a chance to develop; now that it has, and there seems to be support for it, I'm removing the tag; feel free to continue the discussion, though

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 23 February 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{tbd}}~~
-
	==Deletion==		==Deletion==
	I'm not sure how notable this running gag is. There's also special text in [[interview]], [[pizzazz]], [[death metal]], and probably a couple of other emails, but since they don't fit the scope of this page (when the special text is something that Strong Bad mumbles), should they be added to the scope of this page? Or should we leave as it is, with two instances, which is not enough for an article, and so have it '''deleted'''?<br>		I'm not sure how notable this running gag is. There's also special text in [[interview]], [[pizzazz]], [[death metal]], and probably a couple of other emails, but since they don't fit the scope of this page (when the special text is something that Strong Bad mumbles), should they be added to the scope of this page? Or should we leave as it is, with two instances, which is not enough for an article, and so have it '''deleted'''?<br>

Jay: /* Deletion */

Jay — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:55:04 GMT

Deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:55, 23 February 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:The introduction to this article should be rewritten to broaden its scope so the examples above can be included. In fact, I've just done that. Assuming this information isn't covered elsewhere, the article should be '''kept'''. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)		:The introduction to this article should be rewritten to broaden its scope so the examples above can be included. In fact, I've just done that. Assuming this information isn't covered elsewhere, the article should be '''kept'''. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
	::I have to add my vote for '''keep''' as well. Some of them may be listed on [[Strong Bad's Computers Surpassing Their Assumed Capabilities]], but this is really a separate sub-occurrence. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)		::I have to add my vote for '''keep''' as well. Some of them may be listed on [[Strong Bad's Computers Surpassing Their Assumed Capabilities]], but this is really a separate sub-occurrence. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
		+	:::I think it's interesting enough to '''keep'''. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 02:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Deletion */ keep.

Defender1031 — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:49:32 GMT

Deletion: keep.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 21 February 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	{{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)		{{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
	:The introduction to this article should be rewritten to broaden its scope so the examples above can be included. In fact, I've just done that. Assuming this information isn't covered elsewhere, the article should be '''kept'''. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)		:The introduction to this article should be rewritten to broaden its scope so the examples above can be included. In fact, I've just done that. Assuming this information isn't covered elsewhere, the article should be '''kept'''. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
		+	::I have to add my vote for '''keep''' as well. Some of them may be listed on [[Strong Bad's Computers Surpassing Their Assumed Capabilities]], but this is really a separate sub-occurrence. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

It's dot com: move extraneous discussion to your page; reply

It's dot com — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:11:58 GMT

move extraneous discussion to your page; reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 21 February 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Deletion==		==Deletion==
	I'm not sure how notable this running gag is. There's also special text in [[interview]], [[pizzazz]], [[death metal]], and probably a couple of other emails, but since they don't fit the scope of this page (when the special text is something that Strong Bad mumbles), should they be added to the scope of this page? Or should we leave as it is, with two instances, which is not enough for an article, and so have it '''deleted'''?<br>		I'm not sure how notable this running gag is. There's also special text in [[interview]], [[pizzazz]], [[death metal]], and probably a couple of other emails, but since they don't fit the scope of this page (when the special text is something that Strong Bad mumbles), should they be added to the scope of this page? Or should we leave as it is, with two instances, which is not enough for an article, and so have it '''deleted'''?<br>
-	~~NB: Can my userspace ban please be lifted?<br>~~
-	NNBB: Since we're in a hiatus, can we please lighten up on the special logos? I know I'm not the only one who has found them a bit bothersome ([[HRWiki:Main Page Talk Archive 36#Can we not become Google?]]).<br>
	{{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)		{{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
		+	:The introduction to this article should be rewritten to broaden its scope so the examples above can be included. In fact, I've just done that. Assuming this information isn't covered elsewhere, the article should be '''kept'''. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

RickTommy: Created page with '{{tbd}} ==Deletion== I'm not sure how notable this running gag is. There's also special text in interview, pizzazz, death metal, and probably a couple of other email…'

RickTommy — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:27:48 GMT

Created page with '{{tbd}} ==Deletion== I'm not sure how notable this running gag is. There's also special text in interview, pizzazz, death metal, and probably a couple of other email…'

New page

{{tbd}}

==Deletion==
I'm not sure how notable this running gag is. There's also special text in [[interview]], [[pizzazz]], [[death metal]], and probably a couple of other emails, but since they don't fit the scope of this page (when the special text is something that Strong Bad mumbles), should they be added to the scope of this page? Or should we leave as it is, with two instances, which is not enough for an article, and so have it '''deleted'''?<br>
NB: Can my userspace ban please be lifted?<br>
NNBB: Since we're in a hiatus, can we please lighten up on the special logos? I know I'm not the only one who has found them a bit bothersome ([[HRWiki:Main Page Talk Archive 36#Can we *not* become Google?]]).<br>
{{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)