Talk:Style - Revision history

It's dot com: /* Quote source */ reply

It's dot com — Wed, 27 Jan 2016 03:41:21 GMT

Quote source: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:41, 27 January 2016
Line 83:		Line 83:
	Do we supply the source of the quote at the top if there is one? I looked at the only other page that I know has a quote, [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|and it doesn't supply a source]], however, it was created after the quote was added to this page. I personally find that the quote source doesn't really fit into the article itself and looks a bit rubbish. (Though it seems to be the first, so should it be a precedent?) - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 01:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)		Do we supply the source of the quote at the top if there is one? I looked at the only other page that I know has a quote, [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|and it doesn't supply a source]], however, it was created after the quote was added to this page. I personally find that the quote source doesn't really fit into the article itself and looks a bit rubbish. (Though it seems to be the first, so should it be a precedent?) - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 01:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
	:Indentation and a dash might help... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)		:Indentation and a dash might help... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
		+	::The quote on [[Swears]] was added two years before this example. I made them match. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 03:41, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Quote source */ reply

Defender1031 — Wed, 27 Jan 2016 02:16:58 GMT

Quote source: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 27 January 2016
Line 82:		Line 82:

	Do we supply the source of the quote at the top if there is one? I looked at the only other page that I know has a quote, [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|and it doesn't supply a source]], however, it was created after the quote was added to this page. I personally find that the quote source doesn't really fit into the article itself and looks a bit rubbish. (Though it seems to be the first, so should it be a precedent?) - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 01:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)		Do we supply the source of the quote at the top if there is one? I looked at the only other page that I know has a quote, [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|and it doesn't supply a source]], however, it was created after the quote was added to this page. I personally find that the quote source doesn't really fit into the article itself and looks a bit rubbish. (Though it seems to be the first, so should it be a precedent?) - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 01:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
		+	:Indentation and a dash might help... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Catjaz63: /**/Quote source

Catjaz63 — Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:42:10 GMT

: Quote source

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:42, 27 January 2016
Line 78:		Line 78:

	I think the use of the word "Style" so much comes from the Wu-Tang Clan, especially Method Man, who seems to talk about his styles alot. [[User:Marvelrulez\|Marvelrulez]] 13:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)		I think the use of the word "Style" so much comes from the Wu-Tang Clan, especially Method Man, who seems to talk about his styles alot. [[User:Marvelrulez\|Marvelrulez]] 13:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Quote source ==
		+
		+	Do we supply the source of the quote at the top if there is one? I looked at the only other page that I know has a quote, [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|and it doesn't supply a source]], however, it was created after the quote was added to this page. I personally find that the quote source doesn't really fit into the article itself and looks a bit rubbish. (Though it seems to be the first, so should it be a precedent?) - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 01:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Marvelrulez at 13:42, 7 January 2008

Marvelrulez — Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:42:30 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:42, 7 January 2008
Line 73:		Line 73:
	:No, I'm pretty sure the correct term is "seizure", though I'm not completely sure what you're asking. (As for the image code, if you {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup make a user name}} you won't have to type image codes anymore) {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)		:No, I'm pretty sure the correct term is "seizure", though I'm not completely sure what you're asking. (As for the image code, if you {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup make a user name}} you won't have to type image codes anymore) {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
	:According to American Heritage Dictionary, "seize" can mean "to exhibit symptoms of seizure activity, usually with convulsions". So yes, "seizing" is the correct word to use in this situation. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 13:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)		:According to American Heritage Dictionary, "seize" can mean "to exhibit symptoms of seizure activity, usually with convulsions". So yes, "seizing" is the correct word to use in this situation. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 13:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	==I got 36 styles on my mind, on my mind==
		+
		+	I think the use of the word "Style" so much comes from the Wu-Tang Clan, especially Method Man, who seems to talk about his styles alot. [[User:Marvelrulez\|Marvelrulez]] 13:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Wbwolf: Neox, please note the date stamps. Old conversation and closed.

Wbwolf — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 04:35:43 GMT

Neox, please note the date stamps. Old conversation and closed.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:35, 17 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Delete==
	Let me put this simply, '''the freakin' word "style" is NOT a running gag in the so-called "Homestar Runner universe."''' How do you people come up with this stuff? It's NOT. IT'S JUST A WORD. {{User:Darth Katana X/sig}}		Let me put this simply, '''the freakin' word "style" is NOT a running gag in the so-called "Homestar Runner universe."''' How do you people come up with this stuff? It's NOT. IT'S JUST A WORD. {{User:Darth Katana X/sig}}

Line 4:		Line 5:
	::Darth, I have just about had it with these comments of yours. Is it '''that''' hard to say something ''polite'' like "I don't think the word "style" is a running gag. It's really just a word"? We don't have to put up with this. If I see this again, I won't hesitate to block you. Please understand, I am '''not''' objecting to the fact that you don't like this article, but rather your rudeness in writing your comment about it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)		::Darth, I have just about had it with these comments of yours. Is it '''that''' hard to say something ''polite'' like "I don't think the word "style" is a running gag. It's really just a word"? We don't have to put up with this. If I see this again, I won't hesitate to block you. Please understand, I am '''not''' objecting to the fact that you don't like this article, but rather your rudeness in writing your comment about it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
	:::I think the problem with this article was that it had too broad a scope (see below). When you limit the scope a little, the gag becomes more apparent. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 13:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)		:::I think the problem with this article was that it had too broad a scope (see below). When you limit the scope a little, the gag becomes more apparent. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 13:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
-	::::OMG, Darth Katana. Cool it. That is NOT respectful toward Homestar Runner AT ALL. TBC use "style" as a gag. They obviously want to, so who's gonna stop them. Us? YOU WISH! lol {{User:Neox/sig}} 04:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

	== Scope ==		== Scope ==
Line 30:		Line 30:

	(Note: I think darth is taking this waaay too sertiously. If he took a step back and actually looked at the page, I'm sure he would see that it's really not that bad.) [[User:The Big Eye\|The Big Eye]] 05:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)		(Note: I think darth is taking this waaay too sertiously. If he took a step back and actually looked at the page, I'm sure he would see that it's really not that bad.) [[User:The Big Eye\|The Big Eye]] 05:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
-	~~:As I mentioned WAAAY above, Darth Katana is disrespectful. He needs a time out or somethin'! ''': P''' {{User:Neox/sig}} 04:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)~~

	== Scope revisited ==		== Scope revisited ==

Neox: /* This ''is'' considering deletion... */

Neox — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 04:14:17 GMT

This ''is'' considering deletion...

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:14, 17 November 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:

	(Note: I think darth is taking this waaay too sertiously. If he took a step back and actually looked at the page, I'm sure he would see that it's really not that bad.) [[User:The Big Eye\|The Big Eye]] 05:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)		(Note: I think darth is taking this waaay too sertiously. If he took a step back and actually looked at the page, I'm sure he would see that it's really not that bad.) [[User:The Big Eye\|The Big Eye]] 05:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
		+	:As I mentioned WAAAY above, Darth Katana is disrespectful. He needs a time out or somethin'! ''': P''' {{User:Neox/sig}} 04:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

	== Scope revisited ==		== Scope revisited ==

Neox at 04:12, 17 November 2007

Neox — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 04:12:17 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:12, 17 November 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Darth, I have just about had it with these comments of yours. Is it '''that''' hard to say something ''polite'' like "I don't think the word "style" is a running gag. It's really just a word"? We don't have to put up with this. If I see this again, I won't hesitate to block you. Please understand, I am '''not''' objecting to the fact that you don't like this article, but rather your rudeness in writing your comment about it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)		::Darth, I have just about had it with these comments of yours. Is it '''that''' hard to say something ''polite'' like "I don't think the word "style" is a running gag. It's really just a word"? We don't have to put up with this. If I see this again, I won't hesitate to block you. Please understand, I am '''not''' objecting to the fact that you don't like this article, but rather your rudeness in writing your comment about it. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 08:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
	:::I think the problem with this article was that it had too broad a scope (see below). When you limit the scope a little, the gag becomes more apparent. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 13:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)		:::I think the problem with this article was that it had too broad a scope (see below). When you limit the scope a little, the gag becomes more apparent. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 13:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
		+	::::OMG, Darth Katana. Cool it. That is NOT respectful toward Homestar Runner AT ALL. TBC use "style" as a gag. They obviously want to, so who's gonna stop them. Us? YOU WISH! lol {{User:Neox/sig}} 04:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

	== Scope ==		== Scope ==

Has Matt?: /* Seizures */ Reply to anonny

Has Matt? — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:13:40 GMT

Seizures: Reply to anonny

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 2 June 2007
Line 71:		Line 71:
	Is 'seizing' really the correct verb to put in this case of having a seizure? Or did you juys just make that up to avoid redundancy? (Image code: really annoying) {{unsigned\|70.108.21.176\|12:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)}}		Is 'seizing' really the correct verb to put in this case of having a seizure? Or did you juys just make that up to avoid redundancy? (Image code: really annoying) {{unsigned\|70.108.21.176\|12:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)}}
	:No, I'm pretty sure the correct term is "seizure", though I'm not completely sure what you're asking. (As for the image code, if you {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup make a user name}} you won't have to type image codes anymore) {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)		:No, I'm pretty sure the correct term is "seizure", though I'm not completely sure what you're asking. (As for the image code, if you {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup make a user name}} you won't have to type image codes anymore) {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
		+	:According to American Heritage Dictionary, "seize" can mean "to exhibit symptoms of seizure activity, usually with convulsions". So yes, "seizing" is the correct word to use in this situation. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 13:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Homestar-Winner: /* Seizures */

Homestar-Winner — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:34:27 GMT

Seizures

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:34, 2 June 2007
Line 70:		Line 70:

	Is 'seizing' really the correct verb to put in this case of having a seizure? Or did you juys just make that up to avoid redundancy? (Image code: really annoying) {{unsigned\|70.108.21.176\|12:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)}}		Is 'seizing' really the correct verb to put in this case of having a seizure? Or did you juys just make that up to avoid redundancy? (Image code: really annoying) {{unsigned\|70.108.21.176\|12:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)}}
-	:No, I'm pretty sure the correct term is "seizure", though I'm not completely sure what you're asking. (As for the image code, if you make a user name you won't have to type image codes anymore) {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)	+	:No, I'm pretty sure the correct term is "seizure", though I'm not completely sure what you're asking. (As for the image code, if you {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup make a user name}} you won't have to type image codes anymore) {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Homestar-Winner: /* Seizures */ re: re: reply

Homestar-Winner — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:31:55 GMT

Seizures: re: re: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 2 June 2007
Line 70:		Line 70:

	Is 'seizing' really the correct verb to put in this case of having a seizure? Or did you juys just make that up to avoid redundancy? (Image code: really annoying) {{unsigned\|70.108.21.176\|12:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)}}		Is 'seizing' really the correct verb to put in this case of having a seizure? Or did you juys just make that up to avoid redundancy? (Image code: really annoying) {{unsigned\|70.108.21.176\|12:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)}}
		+	:No, I'm pretty sure the correct term is "seizure", though I'm not completely sure what you're asking. (As for the image code, if you make a user name you won't have to type image codes anymore) {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 12:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)