Talk:Repeated Sentences - Revision history

Heimstern Läufer: Change to deletedtalk

Heimstern Läufer — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:11:03 GMT

Change to deletedtalk

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 3 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}
	== Discussion ==		== Discussion ==
	This doesn't seem notable, it seems to just be instances of people using the same phrase twice in a sentence... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)		This doesn't seem notable, it seems to just be instances of people using the same phrase twice in a sentence... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Homestar-Winner: /* Discussion */ delete

Homestar-Winner — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:17:27 GMT

Discussion: delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:17, 31 August 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::::I don't see a strong enough connection between any of the "appearances" for a notable "word running gag" to transpire. Also, it's not repeated sentences, it's repeated words. '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)		:::::I don't see a strong enough connection between any of the "appearances" for a notable "word running gag" to transpire. Also, it's not repeated sentences, it's repeated words. '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
	::::::Phrases more like, but still not notable. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)		::::::Phrases more like, but still not notable. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::::I agree that these appearances all have nothing (or rather, little) in common. '''Delete.''' {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 03:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Discussion */ baleeted

Defender1031 — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:14:25 GMT

Discussion: baleeted

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 28 August 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::Just a note that the essay on Spoons is referring to common objects, and thus it isn't really applicable here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)		::::Just a note that the essay on Spoons is referring to common objects, and thus it isn't really applicable here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
	:::::I don't see a strong enough connection between any of the "appearances" for a notable "word running gag" to transpire. Also, it's not repeated sentences, it's repeated words. '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)		:::::I don't see a strong enough connection between any of the "appearances" for a notable "word running gag" to transpire. Also, it's not repeated sentences, it's repeated words. '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::Phrases more like, but still not notable. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 14:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The Chort: /* Discussion */ delete

The Chort — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:12:41 GMT

Discussion: delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 28 August 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::When I first saw the words 'Repeated Sentences,' I figured it would have something wherein Strong Mad sometimes says stuff twice. Or maybe Strong Bad's email intros in #129 and #191. --[[Special:Contributions/66.82.9.100\|66.82.9.100]] 15:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC) (Char. Jr. since I can't seem to enable cookies)		:::When I first saw the words 'Repeated Sentences,' I figured it would have something wherein Strong Mad sometimes says stuff twice. Or maybe Strong Bad's email intros in #129 and #191. --[[Special:Contributions/66.82.9.100\|66.82.9.100]] 15:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC) (Char. Jr. since I can't seem to enable cookies)
	::::Just a note that the essay on Spoons is referring to common objects, and thus it isn't really applicable here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)		::::Just a note that the essay on Spoons is referring to common objects, and thus it isn't really applicable here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::I don't see a strong enough connection between any of the "appearances" for a notable "word running gag" to transpire. Also, it's not repeated sentences, it's repeated words. '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: brief comment

Heimstern Läufer — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:44:00 GMT

brief comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 23 August 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I guess it doesn't hurt to give the article a little time and see how it fleshes out, but I honestly don't see much prospect in it. What it appears this article is aiming to document is a common comedic device. We don't have an article, say, for all the puns, all the exaggerations, all the slapstick, etc. {{User:GreenHelmet/sig}} 15:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)		::I guess it doesn't hurt to give the article a little time and see how it fleshes out, but I honestly don't see much prospect in it. What it appears this article is aiming to document is a common comedic device. We don't have an article, say, for all the puns, all the exaggerations, all the slapstick, etc. {{User:GreenHelmet/sig}} 15:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
	:::When I first saw the words 'Repeated Sentences,' I figured it would have something wherein Strong Mad sometimes says stuff twice. Or maybe Strong Bad's email intros in #129 and #191. --[[Special:Contributions/66.82.9.100\|66.82.9.100]] 15:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC) (Char. Jr. since I can't seem to enable cookies)		:::When I first saw the words 'Repeated Sentences,' I figured it would have something wherein Strong Mad sometimes says stuff twice. Or maybe Strong Bad's email intros in #129 and #191. --[[Special:Contributions/66.82.9.100\|66.82.9.100]] 15:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC) (Char. Jr. since I can't seem to enable cookies)
		+	::::Just a note that the essay on Spoons is referring to common objects, and thus it isn't really applicable here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

66.82.9.100: /* Discussion */

66.82.9.100 — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:18:50 GMT

Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 23 August 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Agreed. It's more of a [[HRW:SPOON\|spoon]] sort of thing than anything else. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 06:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)		:Agreed. It's more of a [[HRW:SPOON\|spoon]] sort of thing than anything else. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 06:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
	::I guess it doesn't hurt to give the article a little time and see how it fleshes out, but I honestly don't see much prospect in it. What it appears this article is aiming to document is a common comedic device. We don't have an article, say, for all the puns, all the exaggerations, all the slapstick, etc. {{User:GreenHelmet/sig}} 15:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)		::I guess it doesn't hurt to give the article a little time and see how it fleshes out, but I honestly don't see much prospect in it. What it appears this article is aiming to document is a common comedic device. We don't have an article, say, for all the puns, all the exaggerations, all the slapstick, etc. {{User:GreenHelmet/sig}} 15:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::When I first saw the words 'Repeated Sentences,' I figured it would have something wherein Strong Mad sometimes says stuff twice. Or maybe Strong Bad's email intros in #129 and #191. --[[Special:Contributions/66.82.9.100\|66.82.9.100]] 15:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC) (Char. Jr. since I can't seem to enable cookies)

GreenHelmet: /* Discussion */ meh

GreenHelmet — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:14:35 GMT

Discussion: meh

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 18 August 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	This doesn't seem notable, it seems to just be instances of people using the same phrase twice in a sentence... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)		This doesn't seem notable, it seems to just be instances of people using the same phrase twice in a sentence... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
	:Agreed. It's more of a [[HRW:SPOON\|spoon]] sort of thing than anything else. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 06:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)		:Agreed. It's more of a [[HRW:SPOON\|spoon]] sort of thing than anything else. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 06:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
		+	::I guess it doesn't hurt to give the article a little time and see how it fleshes out, but I honestly don't see much prospect in it. What it appears this article is aiming to document is a common comedic device. We don't have an article, say, for all the puns, all the exaggerations, all the slapstick, etc. {{User:GreenHelmet/sig}} 15:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Super Martyo Brother: /* Discussion */ reply

Super Martyo Brother — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:55:29 GMT

Discussion: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 18 August 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Discussion ==		== Discussion ==
	This doesn't seem notable, it seems to just be instances of people using the same phrase twice in a sentence... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)		This doesn't seem notable, it seems to just be instances of people using the same phrase twice in a sentence... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
		+	:Agreed. It's more of a [[HRW:SPOON\|spoon]] sort of thing than anything else. --{{User:Super Martyo Brother/sig}} 06:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: New page: {{ttbd}} == Discussion == This doesn't seem notable, it seems to just be instances of people using the same phrase twice in a sentence... ~~~~

Defender1031 — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:42:56 GMT

New page: {{ttbd}} == Discussion == This doesn't seem notable, it seems to just be instances of people using the same phrase twice in a sentence... ~~~~

New page

{{ttbd}}
== Discussion ==
This doesn't seem notable, it seems to just be instances of people using the same phrase twice in a sentence... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 05:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)