Talk:Rabbit Algebra - Revision history

Jay: /* Was this ever on the Videlectrix site? */

Jay — Tue, 02 May 2006 18:17:47 GMT

Was this ever on the Videlectrix site?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 2 May 2006
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Or did [[Thy Dungeonman 3]] replace it because an old edit said it was available for preview, just not for play?		Or did [[Thy Dungeonman 3]] replace it because an old edit said it was available for preview, just not for play?
	--[[User:146.9.223.86\|146.9.223.86]] 17:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)		--[[User:146.9.223.86\|146.9.223.86]] 17:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
		+	:Dot com added that it was on the website, but the page only mentions two equations it showed, both of which are accounted for without the website (between Pay Plus! and PQPreview.) I can't even remember it what it looked like on the site and think Dot com might just have been mistaken. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

DorianGray — Tue, 02 May 2006 18:15:55 GMT

Newest on the bottom

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 2 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~==Was this ever on the Videlectrix site?==~~
-	~~Or did [[Thy Dungeonman 3]] replace it because an old edit said it was available for preview, just not for play?~~
-	~~--[[User:146.9.223.86\|146.9.223.86]] 17:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)~~
-
	==Solutions==		==Solutions==

Line 26:		Line 22:

	Wanted to restate with less equations and more English. Good catch. -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 19:02, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)		Wanted to restate with less equations and more English. Good catch. -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 19:02, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Was this ever on the Videlectrix site?==
		+	Or did [[Thy Dungeonman 3]] replace it because an old edit said it was available for preview, just not for play?
		+	--[[User:146.9.223.86\|146.9.223.86]] 17:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

146.9.223.86 — Tue, 02 May 2006 17:51:05 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 2 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Was this ever on the Videlectrix site?==
		+	Or did [[Thy Dungeonman 3]] replace it because an old edit said it was available for preview, just not for play?
		+	--[[User:146.9.223.86\|146.9.223.86]] 17:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
		+
	==Solutions==		==Solutions==

tomstiff — Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:02:38 GMT

False Claims

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 9 June 2005
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Exactly what was said above. Thanks for leaving something resembling this in the article.		Exactly what was said above. Thanks for leaving something resembling this in the article.
		+
		+	Wanted to restate with less equations and more English. Good catch. -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 19:02, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

tomstiff — Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:51:36 GMT

False Claims

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 9 June 2005
Line 17:		Line 17:
	x=14 is the only integer value of x that yields an integer result. No one said x had to be an integer -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 14:44, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)		x=14 is the only integer value of x that yields an integer result. No one said x had to be an integer -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 14:44, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

-	You don't even need a calculator to verify. The log of a number is the power to which the base much be raised to equal the number. If the base is the square root of 14, the power to which that number much be raised to equal 14 is 2. The same applies for all integer ~~values of n~~. -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 14:45, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)	+	You don't even need a calculator to verify. The log of a number is the power to which the base much be raised to equal the number. If the base is the square root of 14, the power to which that number much be raised to equal 14 is 2. The same applies for all integer roots (e.g. cube root). -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 14:45, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	Exactly what was said above. Thanks for leaving something resembling this in the article.		Exactly what was said above. Thanks for leaving something resembling this in the article.

tomstiff — Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:44:47 GMT

False Claims: tweak

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 9 June 2005
Line 17:		Line 17:
	x=14 is the only integer value of x that yields an integer result. No one said x had to be an integer -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 14:44, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)		x=14 is the only integer value of x that yields an integer result. No one said x had to be an integer -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 14:44, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

-	You don't even need a calculator to verify. The log of a number is the power to which the base much be raised to equal the number. If ~~n=2,~~ the base ~~b(n)~~ is the square root of 14~~. The~~ power to which that number much be raised to equal 14 is 2. The same applies for all integer values of n. -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 14:45, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)	+	You don't even need a calculator to verify. The log of a number is the power to which the base much be raised to equal the number. If the base is the square root of 14, the power to which that number much be raised to equal 14 is 2. The same applies for all integer values of n. -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 14:45, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	Exactly what was said above. Thanks for leaving something resembling this in the article.		Exactly what was said above. Thanks for leaving something resembling this in the article.

tomstiff — Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:24:16 GMT

Soultions: typo

tomstiff — Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:23:14 GMT

sectioned

tomstiff — Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:12:23 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:12, 9 June 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Yup. And you have 3 mans.--[[User:Tiggera\|Tiggera]] 17:38, 28 Nov 2004 (MST)		Yup. And you have 3 mans.--[[User:Tiggera\|Tiggera]] 17:38, 28 Nov 2004 (MST)
		+
		+	==Square Root of 81==

	Why does the article say 'If solved, X equals ±9.'? Isn't is exactly 9? [[User:Kvb\|Kvb]] 16:10, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)		Why does the article say 'If solved, X equals ±9.'? Isn't is exactly 9? [[User:Kvb\|Kvb]] 16:10, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

tomstiff — Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:11:30 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 9 June 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Why does the article say 'If solved, X equals ±9.'? Isn't is exactly 9? [[User:Kvb\|Kvb]] 16:10, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)		Why does the article say 'If solved, X equals ±9.'? Isn't is exactly 9? [[User:Kvb\|Kvb]] 16:10, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	Multiply 9 x 9 ... you get 81. Multiply -9 x -9 ... what do you get? -- [[User:tomstiff\|tomstiff]] 16:11, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

	== False Claims ==		== False Claims ==