Talk:Quote of the Week - Revision history

Stux: this should count as an inactive checklist and is superceded by the checklist in Talk:Toons

Stux — Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:19:32 GMT

this should count as an inactive checklist and is superceded by the checklist in Talk:Toons

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 6 June 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{featuredarticle}}		{{featuredarticle}}

-	{{talkchecklist\|Checklist for new Weeklies:}}	+	{{talkchecklist\|Checklist for new Weeklies:\|inactive=true}}
	*Add appropriate new entries to [[Quote of the Week]], [[Weekly Fanstuff]] and [[Sketchbook]].		*Add appropriate new entries to [[Quote of the Week]], [[Weekly Fanstuff]] and [[Sketchbook]].
	*Add a new {{tl\|qotw}} line to the Quote of the Week character's page.		*Add a new {{tl\|qotw}} line to the Quote of the Week character's page.
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Update {{tl\|whatsnew}} and [[HR.com updates {{CURRENTYEAR}}]]		Update {{tl\|whatsnew}} and [[HR.com updates {{CURRENTYEAR}}]]
	\|}<br/>		\|}<br/>
		+
	== Ja What? ==		== Ja What? ==

Wolf O'Donnel: /* Marking as inactive */

Wolf O'Donnel — Tue, 08 Feb 2022 04:25:39 GMT

Marking as inactive

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:25, 8 February 2022
Line 238:		Line 238:
	::Concur. Nothing has changed since the last time this was brought up. Maybe there will never be another QotW, ''but if there is'', we've got the procedure ready to go. Removing it does nothing except make us have to look for it when we need it. I'm not sure that we need the inactive label at all, but as long as there ''could'' be a new one, this is not inactive. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)		::Concur. Nothing has changed since the last time this was brought up. Maybe there will never be another QotW, ''but if there is'', we've got the procedure ready to go. Removing it does nothing except make us have to look for it when we need it. I'm not sure that we need the inactive label at all, but as long as there ''could'' be a new one, this is not inactive. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
	:::Yes, I agree. {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Quote_of_the_Week&diff=769258&oldid=769255 That's exactly what I've said earlier.}} {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)		:::Yes, I agree. {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Quote_of_the_Week&diff=769258&oldid=769255 That's exactly what I've said earlier.}} {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Not Working==
		+
		+	Quote of the Week doesn't seem to work on the new site. [[User:Wolf O'Donnel\|Wolf O'Donnel]] 04:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* Marking as inactive */ agree with Heimstern and Dot com

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Mon, 02 Oct 2017 04:11:58 GMT

Marking as inactive: agree with Heimstern and Dot com

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:11, 2 October 2017
Line 237:		Line 237:
	:I don't see why that would be helpful. We mark some of our internal processes, such as FAS, as inactive because their activity is dependent entirely on our own userbase and will not be restarted without a decision made here. By contrast, usage of our weeklies checklist is based entirely on an external factor and thus its activity or lack thereof is not based on what we do. I don't see any value in marking it inactive. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)		:I don't see why that would be helpful. We mark some of our internal processes, such as FAS, as inactive because their activity is dependent entirely on our own userbase and will not be restarted without a decision made here. By contrast, usage of our weeklies checklist is based entirely on an external factor and thus its activity or lack thereof is not based on what we do. I don't see any value in marking it inactive. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
	::Concur. Nothing has changed since the last time this was brought up. Maybe there will never be another QotW, ''but if there is'', we've got the procedure ready to go. Removing it does nothing except make us have to look for it when we need it. I'm not sure that we need the inactive label at all, but as long as there ''could'' be a new one, this is not inactive. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)		::Concur. Nothing has changed since the last time this was brought up. Maybe there will never be another QotW, ''but if there is'', we've got the procedure ready to go. Removing it does nothing except make us have to look for it when we need it. I'm not sure that we need the inactive label at all, but as long as there ''could'' be a new one, this is not inactive. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
		+	:::Yes, I agree. {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Quote_of_the_Week&diff=769258&oldid=769255 That's exactly what I've said earlier.}} {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

It's dot com: /* Marking as inactive */ comment

It's dot com — Mon, 02 Oct 2017 02:44:51 GMT

Marking as inactive: comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 2 October 2017
Line 236:		Line 236:
	I brought this up in an above thread, but now that 1) it's been even longer and 2) [[@StrongBadActual]] seems to have replaced the Weeklies, I more strongly believe that the checklist should be <s>removed</s> marked as inactive. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)		I brought this up in an above thread, but now that 1) it's been even longer and 2) [[@StrongBadActual]] seems to have replaced the Weeklies, I more strongly believe that the checklist should be <s>removed</s> marked as inactive. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
	:I don't see why that would be helpful. We mark some of our internal processes, such as FAS, as inactive because their activity is dependent entirely on our own userbase and will not be restarted without a decision made here. By contrast, usage of our weeklies checklist is based entirely on an external factor and thus its activity or lack thereof is not based on what we do. I don't see any value in marking it inactive. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)		:I don't see why that would be helpful. We mark some of our internal processes, such as FAS, as inactive because their activity is dependent entirely on our own userbase and will not be restarted without a decision made here. By contrast, usage of our weeklies checklist is based entirely on an external factor and thus its activity or lack thereof is not based on what we do. I don't see any value in marking it inactive. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
		+	::Concur. Nothing has changed since the last time this was brought up. Maybe there will never be another QotW, ''but if there is'', we've got the procedure ready to go. Removing it does nothing except make us have to look for it when we need it. I'm not sure that we need the inactive label at all, but as long as there ''could'' be a new one, this is not inactive. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /* Marking as inactive */ reply

Heimstern Läufer — Mon, 02 Oct 2017 02:07:07 GMT

Marking as inactive: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:07, 2 October 2017
Line 235:		Line 235:

	I brought this up in an above thread, but now that 1) it's been even longer and 2) [[@StrongBadActual]] seems to have replaced the Weeklies, I more strongly believe that the checklist should be <s>removed</s> marked as inactive. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)		I brought this up in an above thread, but now that 1) it's been even longer and 2) [[@StrongBadActual]] seems to have replaced the Weeklies, I more strongly believe that the checklist should be <s>removed</s> marked as inactive. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
		+	:I don't see why that would be helpful. We mark some of our internal processes, such as FAS, as inactive because their activity is dependent entirely on our own userbase and will not be restarted without a decision made here. By contrast, usage of our weeklies checklist is based entirely on an external factor and thus its activity or lack thereof is not based on what we do. I don't see any value in marking it inactive. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 02:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

RickTommy: /**/Marking as inactive

RickTommy — Mon, 02 Oct 2017 01:32:29 GMT

: Marking as inactive

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:32, 2 October 2017
Line 231:		Line 231:
	Down in the fun facts, we note how the quote is related to the sketchbook released the same day. I'm wondering if we should move these notes on specific quotes into their own column up in the table itself. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 18:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)		Down in the fun facts, we note how the quote is related to the sketchbook released the same day. I'm wondering if we should move these notes on specific quotes into their own column up in the table itself. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 18:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
	: I actually think that makes more sense than what we're currently doing, so I second the motion. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)		: I actually think that makes more sense than what we're currently doing, so I second the motion. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Marking as inactive ==
		+
		+	I brought this up in an above thread, but now that 1) it's been even longer and 2) [[@StrongBadActual]] seems to have replaced the Weeklies, I more strongly believe that the checklist should be <s>removed</s> marked as inactive. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: rv; Inactive, yes, but not ended. FA and Podstar are gone for good (unless someone decides to start them up again). QOTW, on the other hand, could POTENTIALLY be updated any time.

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Thu, 14 Sep 2017 04:15:40 GMT

rv; Inactive, yes, but not ended. FA and Podstar are gone for good (unless someone decides to start them up again). QOTW, on the other hand, could POTENTIALLY be updated any time.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 14 September 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{featuredarticle}}		{{featuredarticle}}

-	{{talkchecklist\|Checklist for new Weeklies:~~\|inactive=true~~}}	+	{{talkchecklist\|Checklist for new Weeklies:}}
	*Add appropriate new entries to [[Quote of the Week]], [[Weekly Fanstuff]] and [[Sketchbook]].		*Add appropriate new entries to [[Quote of the Week]], [[Weekly Fanstuff]] and [[Sketchbook]].
	*Add a new {{tl\|qotw}} line to the Quote of the Week character's page.		*Add a new {{tl\|qotw}} line to the Quote of the Week character's page.

RickTommy: undid revision 768550; well, it definitely seems that way

RickTommy — Thu, 14 Sep 2017 03:42:13 GMT

undid revision 768550; well, it definitely seems that way

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:42, 14 September 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{featuredarticle}}		{{featuredarticle}}

-	{{talkchecklist\|Checklist for new Weeklies:}}	+	{{talkchecklist\|Checklist for new Weeklies:\|inactive=true}}
	*Add appropriate new entries to [[Quote of the Week]], [[Weekly Fanstuff]] and [[Sketchbook]].		*Add appropriate new entries to [[Quote of the Week]], [[Weekly Fanstuff]] and [[Sketchbook]].
	*Add a new {{tl\|qotw}} line to the Quote of the Week character's page.		*Add a new {{tl\|qotw}} line to the Quote of the Week character's page.

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: Not necessarily. Podstar Runner and Featured Articles have been permanently discontinued, unlike weeklies.

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Wed, 30 Aug 2017 21:35:19 GMT

Not necessarily. Podstar Runner and Featured Articles have been permanently discontinued, unlike weeklies.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 30 August 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{featuredarticle}}		{{featuredarticle}}

-	{{talkchecklist\|Checklist for new Weeklies:~~\|inactive=true~~}}	+	{{talkchecklist\|Checklist for new Weeklies:}}
	*Add appropriate new entries to [[Quote of the Week]], [[Weekly Fanstuff]] and [[Sketchbook]].		*Add appropriate new entries to [[Quote of the Week]], [[Weekly Fanstuff]] and [[Sketchbook]].
	*Add a new {{tl\|qotw}} line to the Quote of the Week character's page.		*Add a new {{tl\|qotw}} line to the Quote of the Week character's page.

RickTommy at 21:15, 30 August 2017

RickTommy — Wed, 30 Aug 2017 21:15:44 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 30 August 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{featuredarticle}}		{{featuredarticle}}

-	{{talkchecklist\|Checklist for new Weeklies:}}	+	{{talkchecklist\|Checklist for new Weeklies:\|inactive=true}}
	*Add appropriate new entries to [[Quote of the Week]], [[Weekly Fanstuff]] and [[Sketchbook]].		*Add appropriate new entries to [[Quote of the Week]], [[Weekly Fanstuff]] and [[Sketchbook]].
	*Add a new {{tl\|qotw}} line to the Quote of the Week character's page.		*Add a new {{tl\|qotw}} line to the Quote of the Week character's page.