Talk:Peacey P - Revision history

Essence of Ghost Water: /* A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads? */

Essence of Ghost Water — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:02:16 GMT

A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 19 April 2010
Line 59:		Line 59:
	::But then that begs the question: does Crack Stuntman really need his own filmography? My own opinion: a person should only get a separate filmography if their list of appearances begins to clutter their main page. With Peacey P and Crack Stuntman only having a few, I think it would be best to list their appearances on their main pages rather than separately. Also, I can't help but notice that both of these guys have illegal drugs as part of their name.		::But then that begs the question: does Crack Stuntman really need his own filmography? My own opinion: a person should only get a separate filmography if their list of appearances begins to clutter their main page. With Peacey P and Crack Stuntman only having a few, I think it would be best to list their appearances on their main pages rather than separately. Also, I can't help but notice that both of these guys have illegal drugs as part of their name.

-	I know this is an old discussion, but I'm starting a new one on the same topic. Anyways, I really don't think he deserves a filmography. Case of point: [[~~The~~ Horrible Painting]]. It has seven entries and it doesn't have a filmography. So, I say we scrap the category and place it all on his article. --[[User:Essence of Ghost Water\|Essence of Ghost Water]] 11:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)	+	I know this is an old discussion, but I'm starting a new one on the same topic. Anyways, I really don't think he deserves a filmography. Case of point: The [[Horrible Painting]]. It has seven entries and it doesn't have a filmography. So, I say we scrap the category and place it all on his article. --[[User:Essence of Ghost Water\|Essence of Ghost Water]] 11:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

	== Next Sursdai.... ==		== Next Sursdai.... ==

	Maybe 'Sursdai' is a made up day of the week, since TBC seems to do that sorta thing. Like in the one SBemail, (I can't remember the name of it, silly me!) where SB tells all the peoples what he does on the other days of the week, and when it cuts back to the calendar, the month is not titled, but instead, 'A Month' is put up there, not a real one, like March, or November. He also does it with FCUSA. He won't tell what state he is located in, and so, TBC made up FCUSA! Think about it. I think Peacy P could say 'Thursday'. [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]] 19:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)		Maybe 'Sursdai' is a made up day of the week, since TBC seems to do that sorta thing. Like in the one SBemail, (I can't remember the name of it, silly me!) where SB tells all the peoples what he does on the other days of the week, and when it cuts back to the calendar, the month is not titled, but instead, 'A Month' is put up there, not a real one, like March, or November. He also does it with FCUSA. He won't tell what state he is located in, and so, TBC made up FCUSA! Think about it. I think Peacy P could say 'Thursday'. [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]] 19:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Essence of Ghost Water: /* A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads? */

Essence of Ghost Water — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:59:48 GMT

A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 19 April 2010
Line 58:		Line 58:
	:I'd think so. After all, he has the same amount of appearances as Crack Stuntman, and he has a filmography. [[User:Monkeytender\|Monkeytender]] 22:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		:I'd think so. After all, he has the same amount of appearances as Crack Stuntman, and he has a filmography. [[User:Monkeytender\|Monkeytender]] 22:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
	::But then that begs the question: does Crack Stuntman really need his own filmography? My own opinion: a person should only get a separate filmography if their list of appearances begins to clutter their main page. With Peacey P and Crack Stuntman only having a few, I think it would be best to list their appearances on their main pages rather than separately. Also, I can't help but notice that both of these guys have illegal drugs as part of their name.		::But then that begs the question: does Crack Stuntman really need his own filmography? My own opinion: a person should only get a separate filmography if their list of appearances begins to clutter their main page. With Peacey P and Crack Stuntman only having a few, I think it would be best to list their appearances on their main pages rather than separately. Also, I can't help but notice that both of these guys have illegal drugs as part of their name.
		+
		+	I know this is an old discussion, but I'm starting a new one on the same topic. Anyways, I really don't think he deserves a filmography. Case of point: [[The Horrible Painting]]. It has seven entries and it doesn't have a filmography. So, I say we scrap the category and place it all on his article. --[[User:Essence of Ghost Water\|Essence of Ghost Water]] 11:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

	== Next Sursdai.... ==		== Next Sursdai.... ==

	Maybe 'Sursdai' is a made up day of the week, since TBC seems to do that sorta thing. Like in the one SBemail, (I can't remember the name of it, silly me!) where SB tells all the peoples what he does on the other days of the week, and when it cuts back to the calendar, the month is not titled, but instead, 'A Month' is put up there, not a real one, like March, or November. He also does it with FCUSA. He won't tell what state he is located in, and so, TBC made up FCUSA! Think about it. I think Peacy P could say 'Thursday'. [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]] 19:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)		Maybe 'Sursdai' is a made up day of the week, since TBC seems to do that sorta thing. Like in the one SBemail, (I can't remember the name of it, silly me!) where SB tells all the peoples what he does on the other days of the week, and when it cuts back to the calendar, the month is not titled, but instead, 'A Month' is put up there, not a real one, like March, or November. He also does it with FCUSA. He won't tell what state he is located in, and so, TBC made up FCUSA! Think about it. I think Peacy P could say 'Thursday'. [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]] 19:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Jibblejibblejibble: /**/Next Sursdai....

Jibblejibblejibble — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:02:07 GMT

: Next Sursdai....

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 19 February 2010
Line 58:		Line 58:
	:I'd think so. After all, he has the same amount of appearances as Crack Stuntman, and he has a filmography. [[User:Monkeytender\|Monkeytender]] 22:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		:I'd think so. After all, he has the same amount of appearances as Crack Stuntman, and he has a filmography. [[User:Monkeytender\|Monkeytender]] 22:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
	::But then that begs the question: does Crack Stuntman really need his own filmography? My own opinion: a person should only get a separate filmography if their list of appearances begins to clutter their main page. With Peacey P and Crack Stuntman only having a few, I think it would be best to list their appearances on their main pages rather than separately. Also, I can't help but notice that both of these guys have illegal drugs as part of their name.		::But then that begs the question: does Crack Stuntman really need his own filmography? My own opinion: a person should only get a separate filmography if their list of appearances begins to clutter their main page. With Peacey P and Crack Stuntman only having a few, I think it would be best to list their appearances on their main pages rather than separately. Also, I can't help but notice that both of these guys have illegal drugs as part of their name.
		+
		+	== Next Sursdai.... ==
		+
		+	Maybe 'Sursdai' is a made up day of the week, since TBC seems to do that sorta thing. Like in the one SBemail, (I can't remember the name of it, silly me!) where SB tells all the peoples what he does on the other days of the week, and when it cuts back to the calendar, the month is not titled, but instead, 'A Month' is put up there, not a real one, like March, or November. He also does it with FCUSA. He won't tell what state he is located in, and so, TBC made up FCUSA! Think about it. I think Peacy P could say 'Thursday'. [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]] 19:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

24.117.107.182: /* A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads? */

24.117.107.182 — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:04:09 GMT

A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 29 July 2009
Line 57:		Line 57:
	Has Peacey P had enough appearances to count to have a filmography now? [[:Category:Tompkins Filmography\|Tompkins]] does... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 21:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		Has Peacey P had enough appearances to count to have a filmography now? [[:Category:Tompkins Filmography\|Tompkins]] does... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 21:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
	:I'd think so. After all, he has the same amount of appearances as Crack Stuntman, and he has a filmography. [[User:Monkeytender\|Monkeytender]] 22:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		:I'd think so. After all, he has the same amount of appearances as Crack Stuntman, and he has a filmography. [[User:Monkeytender\|Monkeytender]] 22:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
		+	::But then that begs the question: does Crack Stuntman really need his own filmography? My own opinion: a person should only get a separate filmography if their list of appearances begins to clutter their main page. With Peacey P and Crack Stuntman only having a few, I think it would be best to list their appearances on their main pages rather than separately. Also, I can't help but notice that both of these guys have illegal drugs as part of their name.

Monkeytender: /* A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads? */

Monkeytender — Mon, 11 May 2009 22:54:12 GMT

A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 11 May 2009
Line 56:		Line 56:

	Has Peacey P had enough appearances to count to have a filmography now? [[:Category:Tompkins Filmography\|Tompkins]] does... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 21:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		Has Peacey P had enough appearances to count to have a filmography now? [[:Category:Tompkins Filmography\|Tompkins]] does... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 21:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
		+	:I'd think so. After all, he has the same amount of appearances as Crack Stuntman, and he has a filmography. [[User:Monkeytender\|Monkeytender]] 22:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Wbwolf: /**/A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads?

Wbwolf — Mon, 11 May 2009 21:01:49 GMT

: A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 11 May 2009
Line 52:		Line 52:
	I'm not going to argue the fact that "ya'll" is how it always appears in print on the site. Do we change ALL y'all's to ya'll then? Or do we leave all non-ya'll related occurrences to remain the more correct y'all, as they are in abundance? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)		I'm not going to argue the fact that "ya'll" is how it always appears in print on the site. Do we change ALL y'all's to ya'll then? Or do we leave all non-ya'll related occurrences to remain the more correct y'all, as they are in abundance? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
	:If it's spelled out, use the visible spelling for that specific instance. If spoken but not written, use "y'all", the correct form. Same as any word, like "alright"/"all right" and "woah"/"whoa". --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)		:If it's spelled out, use the visible spelling for that specific instance. If spoken but not written, use "y'all", the correct form. Same as any word, like "alright"/"all right" and "woah"/"whoa". --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== A filmography, ya'll biscuitheads? ==
		+
		+	Has Peacey P had enough appearances to count to have a filmography now? [[:Category:Tompkins Filmography\|Tompkins]] does... {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 21:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

DorianGray: /* Ya'll vs y'all */ Reply

DorianGray — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:08:37 GMT

Ya'll vs y'all: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:08, 18 June 2008
Line 51:		Line 51:

	I'm not going to argue the fact that "ya'll" is how it always appears in print on the site. Do we change ALL y'all's to ya'll then? Or do we leave all non-ya'll related occurrences to remain the more correct y'all, as they are in abundance? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)		I'm not going to argue the fact that "ya'll" is how it always appears in print on the site. Do we change ALL y'all's to ya'll then? Or do we leave all non-ya'll related occurrences to remain the more correct y'all, as they are in abundance? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	:If it's spelled out, use the visible spelling for that specific instance. If spoken but not written, use "y'all", the correct form. Same as any word, like "alright"/"all right" and "woah"/"whoa". --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Qermaq: /**/Ya'll vs y'all

Qermaq — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:06:34 GMT

: Ya'll vs y'all

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 18 June 2008
Line 47:		Line 47:
	:::Yeah, I guess that makes sense. [[User:0rion\|0rion]] 07:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)		:::Yeah, I guess that makes sense. [[User:0rion\|0rion]] 07:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
	::::Clearly Matt voices the "real" version, while Mike voices the PBTC version. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 06:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)		::::Clearly Matt voices the "real" version, while Mike voices the PBTC version. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 06:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Ya'll vs y'all ==
		+
		+	I'm not going to argue the fact that "ya'll" is how it always appears in print on the site. Do we change ALL y'all's to ya'll then? Or do we leave all non-ya'll related occurrences to remain the more correct y'all, as they are in abundance? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* What's this jargle? */ my apologies trogga, i misunderstood you

Defender1031 — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:26:11 GMT

What's this jargle?: my apologies trogga, i misunderstood you

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 25 November 2007
Line 32:		Line 32:

	::::::::::You gave your reason on your edit summary when you reverted me. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 23:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)		::::::::::You gave your reason on your edit summary when you reverted me. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 23:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::::::::::Oh... THAT'S what you meant... yes, but an edit summary isn't a replacement for a talk post, hence i posted here too. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:26, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

	== Sketch ==		== Sketch ==

Trogga: /* What's this jargle? */ Seriously, DeFender1031, what do you against me?

Trogga — Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:24:37 GMT

What's this jargle?: Seriously, DeFender1031, what do you against me?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 25 November 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:

	:::::::::So suddenly my opinion doesn't count for anything? What are you trying to say? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)		:::::::::So suddenly my opinion doesn't count for anything? What are you trying to say? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::::::::::You gave your reason on your edit summary when you reverted me. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 23:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

	== Sketch ==		== Sketch ==