Talk:Parents - Revision history

Defender1031: She's right. This is forum material.

Defender1031 — Sun, 27 Dec 2015 08:57:16 GMT

She's right. This is forum material.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 27 December 2015
Line 53:		Line 53:
	:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
	:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)		:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-	~~== Both Her Fathers? ==~~
-
-	~~What's Her Face has two fathers? Does this mean she was~~
-	~~Adopted by two gay men? if so, that's awesome. [[Special:Contributions/70.195.64.139\|70.195.64.139]] 21:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)~~
-	~~:It's either:~~
-	~~:1. Her mother divorced her first husband~~
-	~~:2. It's a joke and you're overthinking it.~~
-	~~: - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)~~
-	~~::And to clarify, the reason for that is because she "wants a new stepdad" in Issue 6. The second "father" would be her stepdad. --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 22:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)~~
-	::: Look, I posted this and I want it gone. And I realized this is NOT good for a talk page, we can argue about it on the forum. [[User:XXEmoElephantXx\|XXEmoElephantXx]] 02:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Catjaz63: rv

Catjaz63 — Sun, 27 Dec 2015 02:16:21 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 27 December 2015
Line 53:		Line 53:
	:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
	:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)		:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Both Her Fathers? ==
		+
		+	What's Her Face has two fathers? Does this mean she was
		+	Adopted by two gay men? if so, that's awesome. [[Special:Contributions/70.195.64.139\|70.195.64.139]] 21:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	:It's either:
		+	:1. Her mother divorced her first husband
		+	:2. It's a joke and you're overthinking it.
		+	: - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	::And to clarify, the reason for that is because she "wants a new stepdad" in Issue 6. The second "father" would be her stepdad. --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 22:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	::: Look, I posted this and I want it gone. And I realized this is NOT good for a talk page, we can argue about it on the forum. [[User:XXEmoElephantXx\|XXEmoElephantXx]] 02:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

XXEmoElephantXx: /* Both Her Fathers? */

XXEmoElephantXx — Sun, 27 Dec 2015 02:12:08 GMT

Both Her Fathers?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 27 December 2015
Line 53:		Line 53:
	:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
	:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)		:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-	~~== Both Her Fathers? ==~~
-
-	~~What's Her Face has two fathers? Does this mean she was~~
-	~~Adopted by two gay men? if so, that's awesome. [[Special:Contributions/70.195.64.139\|70.195.64.139]] 21:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)~~
-	~~:It's either:~~
-	~~:1. Her mother divorced her first husband~~
-	~~:2. It's a joke and you're overthinking it.~~
-	~~: - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)~~
-	~~::And to clarify, the reason for that is because she "wants a new stepdad" in Issue 6. The second "father" would be her stepdad. --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 22:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)~~
-	::: Look, I posted this and I want it gone. And I realized this is NOT good for a talk page, we can argue about it on the forum. [[User:XXEmoElephantXx\|XXEmoElephantXx]] 02:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

XXEmoElephantXx: /* Both Her Fathers? */

XXEmoElephantXx — Sun, 27 Dec 2015 02:11:27 GMT

Both Her Fathers?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:11, 27 December 2015
Line 63:		Line 63:
	: - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)		: - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
	::And to clarify, the reason for that is because she "wants a new stepdad" in Issue 6. The second "father" would be her stepdad. --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 22:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)		::And to clarify, the reason for that is because she "wants a new stepdad" in Issue 6. The second "father" would be her stepdad. --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 22:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	::: Look, I posted this and I want it gone. And I realized this is NOT good for a talk page, we can argue about it on the forum. [[User:XXEmoElephantXx\|XXEmoElephantXx]] 02:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Catjaz63: rv; Don't remove other people's talk posts.

Catjaz63 — Sun, 27 Dec 2015 02:04:16 GMT

rv; Don't remove other people's talk posts.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 27 December 2015
Line 53:		Line 53:
	:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
	:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)		:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Both Her Fathers? ==
		+
		+	What's Her Face has two fathers? Does this mean she was
		+	Adopted by two gay men? if so, that's awesome. [[Special:Contributions/70.195.64.139\|70.195.64.139]] 21:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	:It's either:
		+	:1. Her mother divorced her first husband
		+	:2. It's a joke and you're overthinking it.
		+	: - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	::And to clarify, the reason for that is because she "wants a new stepdad" in Issue 6. The second "father" would be her stepdad. --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 22:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

XXEmoElephantXx: It could be either way, let's just shut up about it.

XXEmoElephantXx — Sun, 27 Dec 2015 02:03:35 GMT

It could be either way, let's just shut up about it.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 27 December 2015
Line 53:		Line 53:
	:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
	:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)		:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-	~~== Both Her Fathers? ==~~
-
-	~~What's Her Face has two fathers? Does this mean she was~~
-	~~Adopted by two gay men? if so, that's awesome. [[Special:Contributions/70.195.64.139\|70.195.64.139]] 21:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)~~
-	~~:It's either:~~
-	~~:1. Her mother divorced her first husband~~
-	~~:2. It's a joke and you're overthinking it.~~
-	~~: - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)~~
-	~~::And to clarify, the reason for that is because she "wants a new stepdad" in Issue 6. The second "father" would be her stepdad. --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 22:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)~~

Purple Wrench: yeah, i'm overthinking this too

Purple Wrench — Fri, 25 Dec 2015 22:18:27 GMT

yeah, i'm overthinking this too

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 25 December 2015
Line 62:		Line 62:
	:2. It's a joke and you're overthinking it.		:2. It's a joke and you're overthinking it.
	: - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)		: - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	::And to clarify, the reason for that is because she "wants a new stepdad" in Issue 6. The second "father" would be her stepdad. --{{User:Purple Wrench/sig}} 22:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Catjaz63: /* Both Her Fathers? */

Catjaz63 — Fri, 25 Dec 2015 21:18:41 GMT

Both Her Fathers?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 25 December 2015
Line 58:		Line 58:
	What's Her Face has two fathers? Does this mean she was		What's Her Face has two fathers? Does this mean she was
	Adopted by two gay men? if so, that's awesome. [[Special:Contributions/70.195.64.139\|70.195.64.139]] 21:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)		Adopted by two gay men? if so, that's awesome. [[Special:Contributions/70.195.64.139\|70.195.64.139]] 21:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	:It's either:
		+	:1. Her mother divorced her first husband
		+	:2. It's a joke and you're overthinking it.
		+	: - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 21:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

70.195.64.139: /* Example order */

70.195.64.139 — Fri, 25 Dec 2015 21:16:27 GMT

Example order

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 25 December 2015
Line 53:		Line 53:
	:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
	:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)		:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Both Her Fathers? ==
		+
		+	What's Her Face has two fathers? Does this mean she was
		+	Adopted by two gay men? if so, that's awesome. [[Special:Contributions/70.195.64.139\|70.195.64.139]] 21:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

LikeAsItself: /* Example order */

LikeAsItself — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:17:38 GMT

Example order

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:17, 5 March 2008
Line 52:		Line 52:
	::I didn't want to "overdo" the headings, but if simplicity and clarity call for another depth of subheadings (or greater number), I am not opposed. As for environment and mini-golf... I have no idea what I was thinking when I put those there. They've been fixed. As for Weclome back, I didn't watch the toons again for this, I only went with the transcript, and at first it wasn't obvious that Strong Bad was talking to the audience. Since I didn't want a subsection with only one item, it's in Minor Characters. If it's still not right, it could have its own header. This is closely tied to the issue of whether or not we want further individial subheadings: one for each main character mentioned. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 04:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		::I didn't want to "overdo" the headings, but if simplicity and clarity call for another depth of subheadings (or greater number), I am not opposed. As for environment and mini-golf... I have no idea what I was thinking when I put those there. They've been fixed. As for Weclome back, I didn't watch the toons again for this, I only went with the transcript, and at first it wasn't obvious that Strong Bad was talking to the audience. Since I didn't want a subsection with only one item, it's in Minor Characters. If it's still not right, it could have its own header. This is closely tied to the issue of whether or not we want further individial subheadings: one for each main character mentioned. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 04:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
	:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)		:::Actually, my thought was that Weclome Back's example was directed at the main characters gathered, but not at a specific one, so it's really not appropriate for "Minor Characters" either. I'm not sure where to go with it now. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 04:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
		+	:I think it would be a much better organization technique to put them in chronological order, because anytime someone finds a new one, they're going to assume that's what the order is and add to the bottom of the list (as has happened in the time since you brought this up), which could (and did) result in duplicate facts. I can understand the inclination toward grouping by characters, but this would just result in a mess unless you actually use subheadings, and there just aren't enough facts per character to justify doing this. [[User:LikeAsItself\|LikeAsItself]] 20:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)