Talk:Office of The Brothers Chaps - Revision history

The Cheatbot: autoreplace: Decemberween Dangeresque → Dangeresque Puppet Squad: The Hot Jones Hijack

The Cheatbot — Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:14:28 GMT

autoreplace: Decemberween Dangeresque → Dangeresque Puppet Squad: The Hot Jones Hijack

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 20 December 2022
Line 63:		Line 63:
	* [[:File:@StrongBadActual profile01.jpg\|@StrongBadActual's profile picture]]		* [[:File:@StrongBadActual profile01.jpg\|@StrongBadActual's profile picture]]
	* [[@StrongBadActual Tweets 2015#635895701835137024\|A video of "the Videlectrix office"]] shows off the clearest view of the workspace.		* [[@StrongBadActual Tweets 2015#635895701835137024\|A video of "the Videlectrix office"]] shows off the clearest view of the workspace.
-	* [[Decemberween Dangeresque]] - notably, when Dangeresque jumps up to pound the table you can see the room has the same ceiling details as that Vox photo.	+	* [[Dangeresque Puppet Squad: The Hot Jones Hijack\|Decemberween Dangeresque]] - notably, when Dangeresque jumps up to pound the table you can see the room has the same ceiling details as that Vox photo.

	If I am missing anything that shows they still are at the same place (or more definite confirmation that they moved) please do share! But, assuming TBC are working out of a new office, what would be the best way to address this? Make a new article and move this to "Prior Office of The Brothers Chaps"? Make the current article a subsection under "Prior Office" and add a new section detailing the new location? --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 19:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)		If I am missing anything that shows they still are at the same place (or more definite confirmation that they moved) please do share! But, assuming TBC are working out of a new office, what would be the best way to address this? Make a new article and move this to "Prior Office of The Brothers Chaps"? Make the current article a subsection under "Prior Office" and add a new section detailing the new location? --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 19:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
	:Nice findings! I'm not sure how much there if there's enough to say about the new office to warrant a full page, so it could probably fit under a subsection for now. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 20:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)		:Nice findings! I'm not sure how much there if there's enough to say about the new office to warrant a full page, so it could probably fit under a subsection for now. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 20:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* Current status - a different office? */ reply

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Fri, 08 Oct 2021 20:44:10 GMT

Current status - a different office?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 8 October 2021
Line 66:		Line 66:

	If I am missing anything that shows they still are at the same place (or more definite confirmation that they moved) please do share! But, assuming TBC are working out of a new office, what would be the best way to address this? Make a new article and move this to "Prior Office of The Brothers Chaps"? Make the current article a subsection under "Prior Office" and add a new section detailing the new location? --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 19:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)		If I am missing anything that shows they still are at the same place (or more definite confirmation that they moved) please do share! But, assuming TBC are working out of a new office, what would be the best way to address this? Make a new article and move this to "Prior Office of The Brothers Chaps"? Make the current article a subsection under "Prior Office" and add a new section detailing the new location? --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 19:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
		+	:Nice findings! I'm not sure how much there if there's enough to say about the new office to warrant a full page, so it could probably fit under a subsection for now. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 20:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Bleu Ninja: /* Current status - a different office? */ more details

Bleu Ninja — Thu, 07 Oct 2021 20:19:58 GMT

Current status - a different office?: more details

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 7 October 2021
Line 55:		Line 55:
	* Potentially [[Sbemailiarized!]] (March 2009) - the brief live-action segment might be in the office though I don't recognize the particular room; it could also be in one of their homes.		* Potentially [[Sbemailiarized!]] (March 2009) - the brief live-action segment might be in the office though I don't recognize the particular room; it could also be in one of their homes.

-	~~In [[Vox Interview - 6 Oct 2015\|a '''2015''' Vox interview]]~~, there are a few things that make me suspect that at some point they stopped renting this office:	+	As of 2014, there are a few things that make me suspect that at some point they stopped renting this office:
-	* Matt moved out to Los Angeles ~~"for a few years"~~ before returning to Georgia (he also [[The Jeff Rubin Jeff Rubin Show Interview - 7 July 2014\|mentioned this in a '''2014''' interview]]); it is likely Mike would not feel the need to continue paying for a multi-room office if he would be the solo occupant (especially since [[HRWiki:Hiatuses\|the site was on hiatus]]).	+	* [[Gizmodo Interview - 24 Jan 2017\|The Gizmodo interview]] says that Matt moved out to Los Angeles around 2011-2014 before returning to Georgia (he also [[The Jeff Rubin Jeff Rubin Show Interview - 7 July 2014\|mentioned this in a '''2014''' interview]]); it is likely Mike would not feel the need to continue paying for a multi-room office if he would be the solo occupant (especially since [[HRWiki:Hiatuses\|the site was on hiatus]]).
-	* The Vox interview [https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4129828/140098_0222.jpg includes a photo of TBC at work recording music and voice]. Although the picture itself is likely staged the location seems to be a real workspace - but notably it is ''not'' the sound room as seen in [[Sample of Style]].	+	* [[Vox Interview - 6 Oct 2015\|The Vox interview]] [https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4129828/140098_0222.jpg includes a photo of TBC at work recording music and voice]. Although the picture itself is likely staged the location seems to be a real workspace - but notably it is ''not'' the sound room as seen in [[Sample of Style]].
		+	* [[Screenland - 24 Apr 2017\|The Screenland profile]] provides the clearest visual of this space (around 3:42).

	Several recent indoor sightings seem to have this same office. It can be identified by the beige wall color, gray carpet, wooden trim, and white ceiling; sometimes a rust-colored curtain can be seen.		Several recent indoor sightings seem to have this same office. It can be identified by the beige wall color, gray carpet, wooden trim, and white ceiling; sometimes a rust-colored curtain can be seen.

Bleu Ninja: /**/Current status - a different office?

Bleu Ninja — Thu, 07 Oct 2021 19:45:52 GMT

: Current status - a different office?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 7 October 2021
Line 47:		Line 47:

	Why doesen't the Emotion Eric Interview have a page on the Wiki? Someone create it please, and put the page in the [[Interviews]] page. And when doing, upload all images from emotioneric.com/ae/?adv=theinterview to the Wiki so they can be posted on the page, and then we can use some of those images (mainly the storage room closet image), on this page. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 05:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		Why doesen't the Emotion Eric Interview have a page on the Wiki? Someone create it please, and put the page in the [[Interviews]] page. And when doing, upload all images from emotioneric.com/ae/?adv=theinterview to the Wiki so they can be posted on the page, and then we can use some of those images (mainly the storage room closet image), on this page. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 05:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Current status - a different office? ==
		+
		+	I don't think TBC use this workspace anymore. In general I am referencing the many photos from [[Eric Conveys An Emotion: The Interview\|the Eric interview]] to see what the rooms looked like. The last "confirmed sighting" in the office that I can find is prior to 2010:
		+	* Eric Conveys an Emotion interview (early 2008)
		+	* [[Workin' on the Game]] (May 2008)
		+	* Potentially [[Sbemailiarized!]] (March 2009) - the brief live-action segment might be in the office though I don't recognize the particular room; it could also be in one of their homes.
		+
		+	In [[Vox Interview - 6 Oct 2015\|a '''2015''' Vox interview]], there are a few things that make me suspect that at some point they stopped renting this office:
		+	* Matt moved out to Los Angeles "for a few years" before returning to Georgia (he also [[The Jeff Rubin Jeff Rubin Show Interview - 7 July 2014\|mentioned this in a '''2014''' interview]]); it is likely Mike would not feel the need to continue paying for a multi-room office if he would be the solo occupant (especially since [[HRWiki:Hiatuses\|the site was on hiatus]]).
		+	* The Vox interview [https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4129828/140098_0222.jpg includes a photo of TBC at work recording music and voice]. Although the picture itself is likely staged the location seems to be a real workspace - but notably it is ''not'' the sound room as seen in [[Sample of Style]].
		+
		+	Several recent indoor sightings seem to have this same office. It can be identified by the beige wall color, gray carpet, wooden trim, and white ceiling; sometimes a rust-colored curtain can be seen.
		+	* [[:File:@StrongBadActual profile01.jpg\|@StrongBadActual's profile picture]]
		+	* [[@StrongBadActual Tweets 2015#635895701835137024\|A video of "the Videlectrix office"]] shows off the clearest view of the workspace.
		+	* [[Decemberween Dangeresque]] - notably, when Dangeresque jumps up to pound the table you can see the room has the same ceiling details as that Vox photo.
		+
		+	If I am missing anything that shows they still are at the same place (or more definite confirmation that they moved) please do share! But, assuming TBC are working out of a new office, what would be the best way to address this? Make a new article and move this to "Prior Office of The Brothers Chaps"? Make the current article a subsection under "Prior Office" and add a new section detailing the new location? --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 19:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Mas12806 at 05:03, 3 November 2008

Mas12806 — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 05:03:23 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 3 November 2008
Line 45:		Line 45:

	In [http://www.emotioneric.com/ae/?adv=theinterview this installment] of ''Eric Conveys an Emotion'', there are some different camera angles that might help in describing this place. There even seems to be a storage room(?) (complete with mini fridge and microwave) that I haven't seen anywhere else. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 00:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)		In [http://www.emotioneric.com/ae/?adv=theinterview this installment] of ''Eric Conveys an Emotion'', there are some different camera angles that might help in describing this place. There even seems to be a storage room(?) (complete with mini fridge and microwave) that I haven't seen anywhere else. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 00:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	Why doesen't the Emotion Eric Interview have a page on the Wiki? Someone create it please, and put the page in the [[Interviews]] page. And when doing, upload all images from emotioneric.com/ae/?adv=theinterview to the Wiki so they can be posted on the page, and then we can use some of those images (mainly the storage room closet image), on this page. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 05:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

OptimisticFool: /**/Eric Conveys an Emotion

OptimisticFool — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:05:46 GMT

: Eric Conveys an Emotion

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 8 October 2008
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:::No problem at all!{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)		:::No problem at all!{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
	::::I just trimmed some of the article down, and added some extra info about the office as well. Do you think we should still add some of the more descriptive details about the office (such as computers' actual names and companies from whence they came, extra prop info, etc.)? {{User:DevonM/sig}} 23:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)		::::I just trimmed some of the article down, and added some extra info about the office as well. Do you think we should still add some of the more descriptive details about the office (such as computers' actual names and companies from whence they came, extra prop info, etc.)? {{User:DevonM/sig}} 23:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Eric Conveys an Emotion ==
		+
		+	In [http://www.emotioneric.com/ae/?adv=theinterview this installment] of ''Eric Conveys an Emotion'', there are some different camera angles that might help in describing this place. There even seems to be a storage room(?) (complete with mini fridge and microwave) that I haven't seen anywhere else. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 00:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

DevonM: /* Cleanup */

DevonM — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:23:34 GMT

Cleanup

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:23, 7 October 2008
Line 40:		Line 40:
	::Got it Loafing. Sorry about that. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 22:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)		::Got it Loafing. Sorry about that. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 22:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
	:::No problem at all!{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)		:::No problem at all!{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::I just trimmed some of the article down, and added some extra info about the office as well. Do you think we should still add some of the more descriptive details about the office (such as computers' actual names and companies from whence they came, extra prop info, etc.)? {{User:DevonM/sig}} 23:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Loafing: reply

Loafing — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:08:09 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 7 October 2008
Line 39:		Line 39:
	:He tagged it for deletion so he could move the original page there. Moving an article to a new name is the way to go, as it preserves the article's history. Your approach of creating a new copy of the article would leave us with two versions of it! Also, please note that he then decided to move the article to ''Office'' instead of ''Workplace'', as this is actually what was discussed here on the talk page (and also more appropriate). He also redirected the "workplace" article to the new one to make sure there is really only one copy. In conclusion: if an article is to be renamed, moving it is the way to go. And never move an article to a new name before it's been discussed properly on a talk page and a consensus has been reached.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)		:He tagged it for deletion so he could move the original page there. Moving an article to a new name is the way to go, as it preserves the article's history. Your approach of creating a new copy of the article would leave us with two versions of it! Also, please note that he then decided to move the article to ''Office'' instead of ''Workplace'', as this is actually what was discussed here on the talk page (and also more appropriate). He also redirected the "workplace" article to the new one to make sure there is really only one copy. In conclusion: if an article is to be renamed, moving it is the way to go. And never move an article to a new name before it's been discussed properly on a talk page and a consensus has been reached.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
	::Got it Loafing. Sorry about that. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 22:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)		::Got it Loafing. Sorry about that. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 22:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::No problem at all!{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: really, there's no reason to remove this and without it the conversation doesn't follow

Defender1031 — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:06:14 GMT

really, there's no reason to remove this and without it the conversation doesn't follow

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 7 October 2008
Line 36:		Line 36:
	:I'd wait until we reach a consensus on the "deleted status" of the page. I actually feel it's a good page and should be kept (for some reason, I'm kind of amazed no one's thought of this page before now). {{User:DevonM/sig}} 23:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)		:I'd wait until we reach a consensus on the "deleted status" of the page. I actually feel it's a good page and should be kept (for some reason, I'm kind of amazed no one's thought of this page before now). {{User:DevonM/sig}} 23:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

		+	WHOA WHOA WHOA Defender1031 slow down! The new page should not be pending deletion! Why did you do that? {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 22:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
	:He tagged it for deletion so he could move the original page there. Moving an article to a new name is the way to go, as it preserves the article's history. Your approach of creating a new copy of the article would leave us with two versions of it! Also, please note that he then decided to move the article to ''Office'' instead of ''Workplace'', as this is actually what was discussed here on the talk page (and also more appropriate). He also redirected the "workplace" article to the new one to make sure there is really only one copy. In conclusion: if an article is to be renamed, moving it is the way to go. And never move an article to a new name before it's been discussed properly on a talk page and a consensus has been reached.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)		:He tagged it for deletion so he could move the original page there. Moving an article to a new name is the way to go, as it preserves the article's history. Your approach of creating a new copy of the article would leave us with two versions of it! Also, please note that he then decided to move the article to ''Office'' instead of ''Workplace'', as this is actually what was discussed here on the talk page (and also more appropriate). He also redirected the "workplace" article to the new one to make sure there is really only one copy. In conclusion: if an article is to be renamed, moving it is the way to go. And never move an article to a new name before it's been discussed properly on a talk page and a consensus has been reached.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
-		+	::Got it Loafing. Sorry about that. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 22:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
-	Got it Loafing. Sorry about that. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 22:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)	+

Mas12806 at 22:53, 7 October 2008

Mas12806 — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:53:48 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 7 October 2008
Line 36:		Line 36:
	:I'd wait until we reach a consensus on the "deleted status" of the page. I actually feel it's a good page and should be kept (for some reason, I'm kind of amazed no one's thought of this page before now). {{User:DevonM/sig}} 23:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)		:I'd wait until we reach a consensus on the "deleted status" of the page. I actually feel it's a good page and should be kept (for some reason, I'm kind of amazed no one's thought of this page before now). {{User:DevonM/sig}} 23:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

-	~~WHOA WHOA WHOA Defender1031 slow down! The new page should not be pending deletion! Why did you do that? {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 22:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)~~
	:He tagged it for deletion so he could move the original page there. Moving an article to a new name is the way to go, as it preserves the article's history. Your approach of creating a new copy of the article would leave us with two versions of it! Also, please note that he then decided to move the article to ''Office'' instead of ''Workplace'', as this is actually what was discussed here on the talk page (and also more appropriate). He also redirected the "workplace" article to the new one to make sure there is really only one copy. In conclusion: if an article is to be renamed, moving it is the way to go. And never move an article to a new name before it's been discussed properly on a talk page and a consensus has been reached.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)		:He tagged it for deletion so he could move the original page there. Moving an article to a new name is the way to go, as it preserves the article's history. Your approach of creating a new copy of the article would leave us with two versions of it! Also, please note that he then decided to move the article to ''Office'' instead of ''Workplace'', as this is actually what was discussed here on the talk page (and also more appropriate). He also redirected the "workplace" article to the new one to make sure there is really only one copy. In conclusion: if an article is to be renamed, moving it is the way to go. And never move an article to a new name before it's been discussed properly on a talk page and a consensus has been reached.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
-	::Got it Loafing. Sorry about that. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 22:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)	+
		+	Got it Loafing. Sorry about that. {{User:Mas12806/sig}} 22:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)