Talk:Monopoly Money - Revision history

Defender1031: consensus seems to have been move and rescope. That was done. This is a keep.

Defender1031 — Sat, 22 Aug 2015 18:50:58 GMT

consensus seems to have been move and rescope. That was done. This is a keep.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 22 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{tbd}}~~
	== Go to delete. Go directly to delete. Do not pass [[Main Page\|go]]. Do not collect 200 edits. ==		== Go to delete. Go directly to delete. Do not pass [[Main Page\|go]]. Do not collect 200 edits. ==
	I'm unconvinced about several appearances in this article.		I'm unconvinced about several appearances in this article.

Broncotroll at 17:51, 22 August 2015

Broncotroll — Sat, 22 Aug 2015 17:51:42 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 22 August 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::::I agree with Heimstern and the people who said the page should be moved. As such, I removed the items that didn't fit and moved the page. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:56, 31 March 2011 (UTC)		:::::I agree with Heimstern and the people who said the page should be moved. As such, I removed the items that didn't fit and moved the page. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:56, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
	:'''Delete.''' Yes, I created the article, but now I think it should be deleted. The intro is still about Monopoly as a whole, and there's still one reference in the article that's not about money. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)		:'''Delete.''' Yes, I created the article, but now I think it should be deleted. The intro is still about Monopoly as a whole, and there's still one reference in the article that's not about money. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
		+	:: [[nightlife\|Don't be so hard on yourself]]. I think as monopoly money it's a decent article. I say '''keep'''. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 17:51, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

RickTommy: /* Go to delete. Go directly to delete. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 edits. */

RickTommy — Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:41:46 GMT

Go to delete. Go directly to delete. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 edits.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 13 April 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::I suppose if it were a monopoly money article would be better. I mean strong sad did finance his entire independant film with monopoly money. Monopoly itself, however doesn't really need to be brought up, but a monopoly money page would be good. Maybe this page needs to '''Think of a better commando name''' instead. Sheesh, "firebert" that's the worst commando name ever.--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 15:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)		::::I suppose if it were a monopoly money article would be better. I mean strong sad did finance his entire independant film with monopoly money. Monopoly itself, however doesn't really need to be brought up, but a monopoly money page would be good. Maybe this page needs to '''Think of a better commando name''' instead. Sheesh, "firebert" that's the worst commando name ever.--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 15:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
	:::::I agree with Heimstern and the people who said the page should be moved. As such, I removed the items that didn't fit and moved the page. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:56, 31 March 2011 (UTC)		:::::I agree with Heimstern and the people who said the page should be moved. As such, I removed the items that didn't fit and moved the page. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:56, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
		+	:'''Delete.''' Yes, I created the article, but now I think it should be deleted. The intro is still about Monopoly as a whole, and there's still one reference in the article that's not about money. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

It's dot com: what I did

It's dot com — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:56:16 GMT

what I did

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 31 March 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::::An article about Monopoly money sounds OK to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:17, 23 March 2011 (UTC)		::::::An article about Monopoly money sounds OK to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:17, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
	::::I suppose if it were a monopoly money article would be better. I mean strong sad did finance his entire independant film with monopoly money. Monopoly itself, however doesn't really need to be brought up, but a monopoly money page would be good. Maybe this page needs to '''Think of a better commando name''' instead. Sheesh, "firebert" that's the worst commando name ever.--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 15:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)		::::I suppose if it were a monopoly money article would be better. I mean strong sad did finance his entire independant film with monopoly money. Monopoly itself, however doesn't really need to be brought up, but a monopoly money page would be good. Maybe this page needs to '''Think of a better commando name''' instead. Sheesh, "firebert" that's the worst commando name ever.--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 15:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
		+	:::::I agree with Heimstern and the people who said the page should be moved. As such, I removed the items that didn't fit and moved the page. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:56, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

It's dot com: moved Talk:Monopoly to Talk:Monopoly Money: all remaining entries are for Monopoly money; more or less a consensus to move

It's dot com — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:55:17 GMT

moved Talk:Monopoly to Talk:Monopoly Money: all remaining entries are for Monopoly money; more or less a consensus to move

← Older revision

Revision as of 20:55, 31 March 2011

Safariventureman: /* Go to delete. Go directly to delete. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 edits. */

Safariventureman — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:06:25 GMT

Go to delete. Go directly to delete. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 edits.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 23 March 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::Also, articles don't need pictures in order to be considered viable. Plenty of really good articles don't. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)		:::::Also, articles don't need pictures in order to be considered viable. Plenty of really good articles don't. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
	::::::An article about Monopoly money sounds OK to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:17, 23 March 2011 (UTC)		::::::An article about Monopoly money sounds OK to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:17, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
		+	::::I suppose if it were a monopoly money article would be better. I mean strong sad did finance his entire independant film with monopoly money. Monopoly itself, however doesn't really need to be brought up, but a monopoly money page would be good. Maybe this page needs to '''Think of a better commando name''' instead. Sheesh, "firebert" that's the worst commando name ever.--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 15:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /* Go to delete. Go directly to delete. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 edits. */ nothing I'd be enthusiastic for, but also no problem with it

Heimstern Läufer — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:17:44 GMT

Go to delete. Go directly to delete. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 edits.: nothing I'd be enthusiastic for, but also no problem with it

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:17, 23 March 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::"Monopoly" (the game) isn't a spoon; it's a brand name. Besides, don't funding a movie with its currency, running an economy with its currency, using the currency as a music video prop, using a cameo of the character (if we accept that), and using the token for a fanmade figurine count as "novel uses"? No one's ever seen just ''playing'' the game, after all. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)		::::"Monopoly" (the game) isn't a spoon; it's a brand name. Besides, don't funding a movie with its currency, running an economy with its currency, using the currency as a music video prop, using a cameo of the character (if we accept that), and using the token for a fanmade figurine count as "novel uses"? No one's ever seen just ''playing'' the game, after all. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
	:::::Also, articles don't need pictures in order to be considered viable. Plenty of really good articles don't. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)		:::::Also, articles don't need pictures in order to be considered viable. Plenty of really good articles don't. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
		+	::::::An article about Monopoly money sounds OK to me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:17, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Go to delete. Go directly to delete. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 edits. */ i wasn't aware that we required all articles to have pictures.

Defender1031 — Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:53:49 GMT

Go to delete. Go directly to delete. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 edits.: i wasn't aware that we required all articles to have pictures.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 22 March 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::This is a fine example of the [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoons]] theory developed by the hrwiki. Just because an real life everyday object or brand name is referred to occasionally doesn't mean it's necessary to make an article about it. This is the '''Homestar runner''' wiki not '''Wikipedia'''. Unless this would be like, say, [[Mountain Dew]] which actually held a good signifacance to the homestar universe, is expressed in an interesting way, or holds a good amount of trivial/interesting facts related to homestar, the article is not worth while. Besides this page lacks content and doesn't even have a picture. I'd say '''delete it.'''--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 19:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)		:::This is a fine example of the [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoons]] theory developed by the hrwiki. Just because an real life everyday object or brand name is referred to occasionally doesn't mean it's necessary to make an article about it. This is the '''Homestar runner''' wiki not '''Wikipedia'''. Unless this would be like, say, [[Mountain Dew]] which actually held a good signifacance to the homestar universe, is expressed in an interesting way, or holds a good amount of trivial/interesting facts related to homestar, the article is not worth while. Besides this page lacks content and doesn't even have a picture. I'd say '''delete it.'''--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 19:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
	::::"Monopoly" (the game) isn't a spoon; it's a brand name. Besides, don't funding a movie with its currency, running an economy with its currency, using the currency as a music video prop, using a cameo of the character (if we accept that), and using the token for a fanmade figurine count as "novel uses"? No one's ever seen just ''playing'' the game, after all. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)		::::"Monopoly" (the game) isn't a spoon; it's a brand name. Besides, don't funding a movie with its currency, running an economy with its currency, using the currency as a music video prop, using a cameo of the character (if we accept that), and using the token for a fanmade figurine count as "novel uses"? No one's ever seen just ''playing'' the game, after all. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
		+	:::::Also, articles don't need pictures in order to be considered viable. Plenty of really good articles don't. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Jay at 19:50, 22 March 2011

Jay — Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:50:12 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 22 March 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::I'm fine with the article, but in a mostly-neutral kind of sense. But if not this page, "Monopoly money" would be a perfectly fine option. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)		:::I'm fine with the article, but in a mostly-neutral kind of sense. But if not this page, "Monopoly money" would be a perfectly fine option. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
	:::This is a fine example of the [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoons]] theory developed by the hrwiki. Just because an real life everyday object or brand name is referred to occasionally doesn't mean it's necessary to make an article about it. This is the '''Homestar runner''' wiki not '''Wikipedia'''. Unless this would be like, say, [[Mountain Dew]] which actually held a good signifacance to the homestar universe, is expressed in an interesting way, or holds a good amount of trivial/interesting facts related to homestar, the article is not worth while. Besides this page lacks content and doesn't even have a picture. I'd say '''delete it.'''--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 19:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)		:::This is a fine example of the [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoons]] theory developed by the hrwiki. Just because an real life everyday object or brand name is referred to occasionally doesn't mean it's necessary to make an article about it. This is the '''Homestar runner''' wiki not '''Wikipedia'''. Unless this would be like, say, [[Mountain Dew]] which actually held a good signifacance to the homestar universe, is expressed in an interesting way, or holds a good amount of trivial/interesting facts related to homestar, the article is not worth while. Besides this page lacks content and doesn't even have a picture. I'd say '''delete it.'''--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 19:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
-	::::"Monopoly" (the game) isn't a spoon; it's a brand name. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)	+	::::"Monopoly" (the game) isn't a spoon; it's a brand name. Besides, don't funding a movie with its currency, running an economy with its currency, using the currency as a music video prop, using a cameo of the character (if we accept that), and using the token for a fanmade figurine count as "novel uses"? No one's ever seen just ''playing'' the game, after all. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Jay at 19:47, 22 March 2011

Jay — Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:47:49 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 22 March 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::I'm fine with the article, but in a mostly-neutral kind of sense. But if not this page, "Monopoly money" would be a perfectly fine option. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)		:::I'm fine with the article, but in a mostly-neutral kind of sense. But if not this page, "Monopoly money" would be a perfectly fine option. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
	:::This is a fine example of the [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoons]] theory developed by the hrwiki. Just because an real life everyday object or brand name is referred to occasionally doesn't mean it's necessary to make an article about it. This is the '''Homestar runner''' wiki not '''Wikipedia'''. Unless this would be like, say, [[Mountain Dew]] which actually held a good signifacance to the homestar universe, is expressed in an interesting way, or holds a good amount of trivial/interesting facts related to homestar, the article is not worth while. Besides this page lacks content and doesn't even have a picture. I'd say '''delete it.'''--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 19:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)		:::This is a fine example of the [[HRWiki:Spoons\|Spoons]] theory developed by the hrwiki. Just because an real life everyday object or brand name is referred to occasionally doesn't mean it's necessary to make an article about it. This is the '''Homestar runner''' wiki not '''Wikipedia'''. Unless this would be like, say, [[Mountain Dew]] which actually held a good signifacance to the homestar universe, is expressed in an interesting way, or holds a good amount of trivial/interesting facts related to homestar, the article is not worth while. Besides this page lacks content and doesn't even have a picture. I'd say '''delete it.'''--[[user:safariventureman\|<span style="color:F90 ;">safariventureman</span>]] 19:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
		+	::::"Monopoly" (the game) isn't a spoon; it's a brand name. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)