Talk:Litigation Jackson - Revision history

160.39.213.200: /**/The Background of the LJ2 Poster

160.39.213.200 — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:03:12 GMT

: The Background of the LJ2 Poster

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 15 October 2008
Line 31:		Line 31:

	How can we be so sure that Litigation Jackson was made Videlectrix Films from one, vague line of dialogue? "People" doesn't have to refer to one group of people. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 21:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)		How can we be so sure that Litigation Jackson was made Videlectrix Films from one, vague line of dialogue? "People" doesn't have to refer to one group of people. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 21:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== The Background of the LJ2 Poster ==
		+
		+	The background of the LJ2 poster is identified as the New York Stock Exchange. It is in fact an image of 60 Centre Street, in Manhattan, NY, which houses the Supreme Court of New York, Manhattan County.
		+	I tried to edit this on the wiki page itself, but I don't have an account, and apparently can't edit the actual page text unless I make one.

Trogga: /**/Videlectrix Films

Trogga — Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:23:23 GMT

: Videlectrix Films

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 4 July 2007
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Should we have an "appearances" list? I would add one, but I don't know how. [[User:Coveredinharmony\|CoveredinSuudzu]] 15:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)		Should we have an "appearances" list? I would add one, but I don't know how. [[User:Coveredinharmony\|CoveredinSuudzu]] 15:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Videlectrix Films ==
		+
		+	How can we be so sure that Litigation Jackson was made Videlectrix Films from one, vague line of dialogue? "People" doesn't have to refer to one group of people. --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 21:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Coveredinharmony: /**/Keeping up Appearances

Coveredinharmony — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:14:14 GMT

: Keeping up Appearances

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 1 June 2007
Line 23:		Line 23:

	He looks more like [[Matt]] to me. Also, remember to sign your posts. --[[User:Jnelson09\|Jnelson09]] 17:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)		He looks more like [[Matt]] to me. Also, remember to sign your posts. --[[User:Jnelson09\|Jnelson09]] 17:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Keeping up Appearances ==
		+
		+	Should we have an "appearances" list? I would add one, but I don't know how. [[User:Coveredinharmony\|CoveredinSuudzu]] 15:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Jnelson09: /* Litigation Jackson 2 = Dominic Masters */

Jnelson09 — Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:49:37 GMT

Litigation Jackson 2 = Dominic Masters

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 4 April 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:

	This is probably not really relevant to anything, but on the poster for Litigation Jackson 2, he looks rather like Dominic Masters, the singer of british band 'The Others'.		This is probably not really relevant to anything, but on the poster for Litigation Jackson 2, he looks rather like Dominic Masters, the singer of british band 'The Others'.
		+
		+	He looks more like [[Matt]] to me. Also, remember to sign your posts. --[[User:Jnelson09\|Jnelson09]] 17:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

88.108.203.159: /**/Litigation Jackson 2 = Dominic Masters

88.108.203.159 — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:29:22 GMT

: Litigation Jackson 2 = Dominic Masters

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 21 December 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Litigation Jackson: Taking your bill to Capitol Hill! [[User:24.17.18.66\|24.17.18.66]] 12:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC) + Sweetandy		Litigation Jackson: Taking your bill to Capitol Hill! [[User:24.17.18.66\|24.17.18.66]] 12:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC) + Sweetandy
		+
		+	== Litigation Jackson 2 = Dominic Masters ==
		+
		+	This is probably not really relevant to anything, but on the poster for Litigation Jackson 2, he looks rather like Dominic Masters, the singer of british band 'The Others'.

24.17.18.66 at 12:23, 24 November 2006

24.17.18.66 — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:23:08 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 24 November 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:Oh, you're right. It could be either of the Sportsinterviewses. The poster was made two years before Crazy Prof. was explicitly first mentioned, and three years before Bev was explicitly mentioned. So it's most likely Lem, because he's also a director. But we don't know for sure.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)		:Oh, you're right. It could be either of the Sportsinterviewses. The poster was made two years before Crazy Prof. was explicitly first mentioned, and three years before Bev was explicitly mentioned. So it's most likely Lem, because he's also a director. But we don't know for sure.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
	:Personally I'm kinda surprised TBC didn't attribute the movies in question to a "[[Wikipedia:Steven Spielberg\|''Steven'' Sportinterviews]]." ;) [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 00:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)		:Personally I'm kinda surprised TBC didn't attribute the movies in question to a "[[Wikipedia:Steven Spielberg\|''Steven'' Sportinterviews]]." ;) [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 00:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Litigation Jackson! ==
		+
		+	Litigation Jackson: Taking your bill to Capitol Hill! [[User:24.17.18.66\|24.17.18.66]] 12:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC) + Sweetandy

Octan: /* Lem... or Bev? */

Octan — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:48:47 GMT

Lem... or Bev?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:48, 11 October 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:
	THe article says the poster mentions Lem, but of course it simply gives the last name. THat last name could be either of 2 people (perhaps 3). I'd rewrite it myself but I haven't the brainpower ar the moment. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 10:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)		THe article says the poster mentions Lem, but of course it simply gives the last name. THat last name could be either of 2 people (perhaps 3). I'd rewrite it myself but I haven't the brainpower ar the moment. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 10:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
	:Oh, you're right. It could be either of the Sportsinterviewses. The poster was made two years before Crazy Prof. was explicitly first mentioned, and three years before Bev was explicitly mentioned. So it's most likely Lem, because he's also a director. But we don't know for sure.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)		:Oh, you're right. It could be either of the Sportsinterviewses. The poster was made two years before Crazy Prof. was explicitly first mentioned, and three years before Bev was explicitly mentioned. So it's most likely Lem, because he's also a director. But we don't know for sure.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
		+	:Personally I'm kinda surprised TBC didn't attribute the movies in question to a "[[Wikipedia:Steven Spielberg\|''Steven'' Sportinterviews]]." ;) [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 00:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Loafing: /* Lem... or Bev? */ reply

Loafing — Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:12:24 GMT

Lem... or Bev?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 23 September 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:

	THe article says the poster mentions Lem, but of course it simply gives the last name. THat last name could be either of 2 people (perhaps 3). I'd rewrite it myself but I haven't the brainpower ar the moment. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 10:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)		THe article says the poster mentions Lem, but of course it simply gives the last name. THat last name could be either of 2 people (perhaps 3). I'd rewrite it myself but I haven't the brainpower ar the moment. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 10:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
		+	:Oh, you're right. It could be either of the Sportsinterviewses. The poster was made two years before Crazy Prof. was explicitly first mentioned, and three years before Bev was explicitly mentioned. So it's most likely Lem, because he's also a director. But we don't know for sure.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 11:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Qermaq: Lem... or Bev?

Qermaq — Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:56:11 GMT

Lem... or Bev?

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 23 September 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::"this is an American cartoon" - I was going to add that in as a "fair enough" comment, but I kinda forgot to as I was deep in research - Id hate to have written all that and have been totally and humiliatingly wrong :-)		::"this is an American cartoon" - I was going to add that in as a "fair enough" comment, but I kinda forgot to as I was deep in research - Id hate to have written all that and have been totally and humiliatingly wrong :-)
		+
		+	== Lem... or Bev? ==
		+
		+	THe article says the poster mentions Lem, but of course it simply gives the last name. THat last name could be either of 2 people (perhaps 3). I'd rewrite it myself but I haven't the brainpower ar the moment. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 10:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

It's dot com: Reverted edit of 131.247.98.80, changed back to last version by 62.254.0.14

It's dot com — Wed, 02 Nov 2005 19:18:00 GMT

Reverted edit of 131.247.98.80, changed back to last version by 62.254.0.14

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 2 November 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::"this is an American cartoon" - I was going to add that in as a "fair enough" comment, but I kinda forgot to as I was deep in research - Id hate to have written all that and have been totally and humiliatingly wrong :-)		::"this is an American cartoon" - I was going to add that in as a "fair enough" comment, but I kinda forgot to as I was deep in research - Id hate to have written all that and have been totally and humiliatingly wrong :-)
-
-	~~'''COMING SOON TO THEATRES!: PUNCTUATION JACKSON!'''~~
-	~~Seiriously guys. Shut up.~~