Talk:LLC,,. - Revision history

Jellote: Sorry that I started this.

Jellote — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:07:27 GMT

Sorry that I started this.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 9 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Necessary? ==		== Necessary? ==

-	What the crap-make? What is this? WHY is this? Why did you even add this garglemesh? I don't understand! Or maybe I sort of do... but do we need this? --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 19:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)	+	<strike>What the crap-make? What is this? WHY is this? Why did you even add this garglemesh? I don't understand! Or maybe I sort of do... but do we need this? --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 19:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)</strike> Alright, I understand why we have this now. The ,,. thing is original. Sorry. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 00:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
	:Well, it is a running gag, and there's three appearances. When there was just two, we could just say Totalsoft was a reference to Thoraxcorp, but with three, it's a running joke in its own right. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 22:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)		:Well, it is a running gag, and there's three appearances. When there was just two, we could just say Totalsoft was a reference to Thoraxcorp, but with three, it's a running joke in its own right. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 22:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
	::Yeah, I consider this a perfectly fine article. Could do with a screenshot and a category that isn't TBD, but it can stay. --[[User:Jay\|<span style = "color: #9999FF">''JJC''</span>]][[User talk:Jay\|<span style = "color: #006633"><small>,,.</small></span>]] 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)		::Yeah, I consider this a perfectly fine article. Could do with a screenshot and a category that isn't TBD, but it can stay. --[[User:Jay\|<span style = "color: #9999FF">''JJC''</span>]][[User talk:Jay\|<span style = "color: #006633"><small>,,.</small></span>]] 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

The Chort: 9 keeps means a consensus has been reached. removing template

The Chort — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:46:37 GMT

9 keeps means a consensus has been reached. removing template

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 4 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{ttbd}}~~
	== Necessary? ==		== Necessary? ==

Elcool: /* Explanation */ siggity-sig

Elcool — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 05:47:38 GMT

Explanation: siggity-sig

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:47, 4 April 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== Explanation ==		== Explanation ==

-	I'm just wondering, since I don't know much about legalese - Is there any way to actually construct this type of punctuation? Or something similar? (only one comma, for example, or two dots and one comma)	+	I'm just wondering, since I don't know much about legalese - Is there any way to actually construct this type of punctuation? Or something similar? (only one comma, for example, or two dots and one comma) {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Elcool: /**/Explanation

Elcool — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 05:47:22 GMT

: Explanation

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:47, 4 April 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::::::'''Keep.''' The irregular punctuation makes it out of the ordinary and the three (now four) appearances of it makes it count as a running gags. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)		::::::::'''Keep.''' The irregular punctuation makes it out of the ordinary and the three (now four) appearances of it makes it count as a running gags. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::::'''Keep.''' Nowhere else on the Internet will you see this exact punctuation other than H*R. Probably. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)		:::::::::'''Keep.''' Nowhere else on the Internet will you see this exact punctuation other than H*R. Probably. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Explanation ==
		+
		+	I'm just wondering, since I don't know much about legalese - Is there any way to actually construct this type of punctuation? Or something similar? (only one comma, for example, or two dots and one comma)

The Chort: /* Necessary? */ Keep

The Chort — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:39:26 GMT

Necessary?: Keep

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 2 April 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::::Might I add that you current sig, Sir Hiney Rabbit Honey-squire Durr DeFender Piffle, works pretty well on this page. Especially with the most recent toon. Needs an "LLC,,." in it though. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		::::::Might I add that you current sig, Sir Hiney Rabbit Honey-squire Durr DeFender Piffle, works pretty well on this page. Especially with the most recent toon. Needs an "LLC,,." in it though. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::I vote "Keep". There are now four LLC,,.s in the H*R universe. {{User:Dagoth/sig}} 08:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		:::::::I vote "Keep". There are now four LLC,,.s in the H*R universe. {{User:Dagoth/sig}} 08:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
-	::::::::'''Keep. The irregular punctuation makes it out of the ordinary and the three (now four) appearances of it makes it count as a running gags. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)	+	::::::::'''Keep.''' The irregular punctuation makes it out of the ordinary and the three (now four) appearances of it makes it count as a running gags. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::'''Keep.''' Nowhere else on the Internet will you see this exact punctuation other than H*R. Probably. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 18:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Homestar-Winner: /* Necessary? */ keep

Homestar-Winner — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:27:46 GMT

Necessary?: keep

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 2 April 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::::Might I add that you current sig, Sir Hiney Rabbit Honey-squire Durr DeFender Piffle, works pretty well on this page. Especially with the most recent toon. Needs an "LLC,,." in it though. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		::::::Might I add that you current sig, Sir Hiney Rabbit Honey-squire Durr DeFender Piffle, works pretty well on this page. Especially with the most recent toon. Needs an "LLC,,." in it though. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::I vote "Keep". There are now four LLC,,.s in the H*R universe. {{User:Dagoth/sig}} 08:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		:::::::I vote "Keep". There are now four LLC,,.s in the H*R universe. {{User:Dagoth/sig}} 08:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::'''Keep. The irregular punctuation makes it out of the ordinary and the three (now four) appearances of it makes it count as a running gags. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Dagoth at 08:47, 1 April 2009

Dagoth — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:47:42 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:47, 1 April 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::::Definate keeper. It is a running gag and should be kept. 8:15 p.m. March 31, 2009		:::::Definate keeper. It is a running gag and should be kept. 8:15 p.m. March 31, 2009
	::::::Might I add that you current sig, Sir Hiney Rabbit Honey-squire Durr DeFender Piffle, works pretty well on this page. Especially with the most recent toon. Needs an "LLC,,." in it though. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		::::::Might I add that you current sig, Sir Hiney Rabbit Honey-squire Durr DeFender Piffle, works pretty well on this page. Especially with the most recent toon. Needs an "LLC,,." in it though. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::I vote "Keep". There are now four LLC,,.s in the H*R universe. {{User:Dagoth/sig}} 08:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Jay: /* Necessary? */

Jay — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:39:53 GMT

Necessary?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:39, 1 April 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::Nice article, could use more info but nice article. '''Keep'''--{{User:Record307/sig}} 21:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)		::::Nice article, could use more info but nice article. '''Keep'''--{{User:Record307/sig}} 21:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
	:::::Definate keeper. It is a running gag and should be kept. 8:15 p.m. March 31, 2009		:::::Definate keeper. It is a running gag and should be kept. 8:15 p.m. March 31, 2009
		+	::::::Might I add that you current sig, Sir Hiney Rabbit Honey-squire Durr DeFender Piffle, works pretty well on this page. Especially with the most recent toon. Needs an "LLC,,." in it though. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Lord High Awesomeparty: /* Necessary? */

Lord High Awesomeparty — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:16:27 GMT

Necessary?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 1 April 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::Certainly valid. '''Keep''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)		:::Certainly valid. '''Keep''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
	::::Nice article, could use more info but nice article. '''Keep'''--{{User:Record307/sig}} 21:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)		::::Nice article, could use more info but nice article. '''Keep'''--{{User:Record307/sig}} 21:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::Definate keeper. It is a running gag and should be kept. 8:15 p.m. March 31, 2009

Record307: keep

Record307 — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:34:46 GMT

keep

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 31 March 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::Yeah, I consider this a perfectly fine article. Could do with a screenshot and a category that isn't TBD, but it can stay. --[[User:Jay\|<span style = "color: #9999FF">''JJC''</span>]][[User talk:Jay\|<span style = "color: #006633"><small>,,.</small></span>]] 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)		::Yeah, I consider this a perfectly fine article. Could do with a screenshot and a category that isn't TBD, but it can stay. --[[User:Jay\|<span style = "color: #9999FF">''JJC''</span>]][[User talk:Jay\|<span style = "color: #006633"><small>,,.</small></span>]] 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
	:::Certainly valid. '''Keep''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)		:::Certainly valid. '''Keep''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::Nice article, could use more info but nice article. '''Keep'''--{{User:Record307/sig}} 21:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)