Talk:Flashforward Interview - 10 Feb 2006 - Revision history

Elcool: /* A jorb well done */ make him king

Elcool — Thu, 23 Feb 2006 07:01:35 GMT

A jorb well done: make him king

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:01, 23 February 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	== A jorb well done ==		== A jorb well done ==
-
	We got this thing done! Great job all, esp. Phlip! {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 06:39, 23 February 2006 (UTC)		We got this thing done! Great job all, esp. Phlip! {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 06:39, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Yeah! Putting the ''inprogress'' tag and after two hours finishing it... Just wow. Philip, you deserve an award! {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 07:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Qermaq: A jorb well done

Qermaq — Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:39:11 GMT

A jorb well done

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:39, 23 February 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:

	:Sounds good, thanks. Everybody's got their own little way of transcribing, the funny thing about this interview is that half a dozen people have taken turns, meaning the transcribing style changes at least as many times through it. Thanks for the help though, I only transcribed one minute of this thusfar. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 14:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC)		:Sounds good, thanks. Everybody's got their own little way of transcribing, the funny thing about this interview is that half a dozen people have taken turns, meaning the transcribing style changes at least as many times through it. Thanks for the help though, I only transcribed one minute of this thusfar. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 14:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== A jorb well done ==
		+
		+	We got this thing done! Great job all, esp. Phlip! {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 06:39, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Thunderbird L17: /* Muttering */ - Reply.

Thunderbird L17 — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:06:11 GMT

Muttering: - Reply.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:06, 22 February 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:

	In the bits I've transcribed, I've left out any "um, like, you know", and stuttered words and the like... feel free to go through and add them if you think it's worth the effort... Also, in case you can't guess, ''{?}'' means I can't make out what's being said... {{User:Phlip/sig}} 14:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)		In the bits I've transcribed, I've left out any "um, like, you know", and stuttered words and the like... feel free to go through and add them if you think it's worth the effort... Also, in case you can't guess, ''{?}'' means I can't make out what's being said... {{User:Phlip/sig}} 14:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Sounds good, thanks. Everybody's got their own little way of transcribing, the funny thing about this interview is that half a dozen people have taken turns, meaning the transcribing style changes at least as many times through it. Thanks for the help though, I only transcribed one minute of this thusfar. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 14:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Phlip: Muttering

Phlip — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:02:43 GMT

Muttering

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 22 February 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:

	I added some subsections because it's going to be a VERY long transcription when it's done. Titles can certainly be improved if anyone desires. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 20:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)		I added some subsections because it's going to be a VERY long transcription when it's done. Titles can certainly be improved if anyone desires. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 20:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Muttering ==
		+
		+	In the bits I've transcribed, I've left out any "um, like, you know", and stuttered words and the like... feel free to go through and add them if you think it's worth the effort... Also, in case you can't guess, ''{?}'' means I can't make out what's being said... {{User:Phlip/sig}} 14:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Qermaq: Subsections

Qermaq — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:30:54 GMT

Subsections

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 21 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	As far as I can tell from [http://blog.flashforwardconference.com/2006/02/10/podcast-chapman-brothers-interview/ here], the date they posted it was the 10th of February. Or am I reading it wrong? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)		As far as I can tell from [http://blog.flashforwardconference.com/2006/02/10/podcast-chapman-brothers-interview/ here], the date they posted it was the 10th of February. Or am I reading it wrong? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
	:<s>Sounds</s> Looks right to me. - {{User:Kookykman/sig}}		:<s>Sounds</s> Looks right to me. - {{User:Kookykman/sig}}
		+
		+	== Subsections ==
		+
		+	I added some subsections because it's going to be a VERY long transcription when it's done. Titles can certainly be improved if anyone desires. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 20:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Thunderbird L17: Talk:Flashforward Interview - 10 February 2006 moved to Talk:Flashforward Interview - 10 Feb 2006

Thunderbird L17 — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:33:18 GMT

Talk:Flashforward Interview - 10 February 2006 moved to Talk:Flashforward Interview - 10 Feb 2006

← Older revision

Revision as of 22:33, 20 February 2006

Kookykman: Code

Kookykman — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:15:40 GMT

Code

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 20 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	As far as I can tell from [http://blog.flashforwardconference.com/2006/02/10/podcast-chapman-brothers-interview/ here], the date they posted it was the 10th of February. Or am I reading it wrong? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)		As far as I can tell from [http://blog.flashforwardconference.com/2006/02/10/podcast-chapman-brothers-interview/ here], the date they posted it was the 10th of February. Or am I reading it wrong? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
-	:<s>Sounds</b> Looks right to me. - {{User:Kookykman/sig}}	+	:<s>Sounds</s> Looks right to me. - {{User:Kookykman/sig}}

Kookykman: Looks right.

Kookykman — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:15:28 GMT

Looks right.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 20 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	As far as I can tell from [http://blog.flashforwardconference.com/2006/02/10/podcast-chapman-brothers-interview/ here], the date they posted it was the 10th of February. Or am I reading it wrong? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)		As far as I can tell from [http://blog.flashforwardconference.com/2006/02/10/podcast-chapman-brothers-interview/ here], the date they posted it was the 10th of February. Or am I reading it wrong? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
		+	:<s>Sounds</b> Looks right to me. - {{User:Kookykman/sig}}

Thunderbird L17: Date?

Thunderbird L17 — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:14:21 GMT

Date?

New page

As far as I can tell from [http://blog.flashforwardconference.com/2006/02/10/podcast-chapman-brothers-interview/ here], the date they posted it was the 10th of February. Or am I reading it wrong? {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)