Talk:Extensions - Revision history

The Chort: template

The Chort — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:10:34 GMT

template

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 9 March 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{deletedtalk}}	+	{{deletedtalk\|merge=Links}}
	I highly suggest, mainly because some research was put into this, not to completely delete this page, but to clean it up and merge it with [[Links]]. What do you say? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)		I highly suggest, mainly because some research was put into this, not to completely delete this page, but to clean it up and merge it with [[Links]]. What do you say? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
	:I would second that, but I heard that some of these are actually rip-offs of the real scripts. The All-in-one script (which i just deleted from that article), for example. Maybe Tom can give some feedback about this?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 12:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)		:I would second that, but I heard that some of these are actually rip-offs of the real scripts. The All-in-one script (which i just deleted from that article), for example. Maybe Tom can give some feedback about this?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 12:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Homestar-Winner: {{ttbd}} --> {{deletedtalk}}

Homestar-Winner — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:35:42 GMT

{{ttbd}} --> {{deletedtalk}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:35, 31 January 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}
	I highly suggest, mainly because some research was put into this, not to completely delete this page, but to clean it up and merge it with [[Links]]. What do you say? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)		I highly suggest, mainly because some research was put into this, not to completely delete this page, but to clean it up and merge it with [[Links]]. What do you say? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
	:I would second that, but I heard that some of these are actually rip-offs of the real scripts. The All-in-one script (which i just deleted from that article), for example. Maybe Tom can give some feedback about this?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 12:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)		:I would second that, but I heard that some of these are actually rip-offs of the real scripts. The All-in-one script (which i just deleted from that article), for example. Maybe Tom can give some feedback about this?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 12:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Qermaq: merge

Qermaq — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:37:01 GMT

merge

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 22 January 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::If there were a greater variety of such extensions, I would support merging this page with [[Links]], but I agree that there's not enough info currently. Unless more varied examples are provided, I would support del teation. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)		::If there were a greater variety of such extensions, I would support merging this page with [[Links]], but I agree that there's not enough info currently. Unless more varied examples are provided, I would support del teation. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
	:::We should go ahead and just '''merge''' it. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)		:::We should go ahead and just '''merge''' it. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::'''Merge'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Homestar-Winner at 02:38, 19 January 2008

Homestar-Winner — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:38:56 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:38, 19 January 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Concurence with the <b>Merge</b>. Unwieldy, and not especially useful as a stand-alone article — [[User:Flashfight\|Flashfight]] 01:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)		:Concurence with the <b>Merge</b>. Unwieldy, and not especially useful as a stand-alone article — [[User:Flashfight\|Flashfight]] 01:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
	::If there were a greater variety of such extensions, I would support merging this page with [[Links]], but I agree that there's not enough info currently. Unless more varied examples are provided, I would support del teation. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)		::If there were a greater variety of such extensions, I would support merging this page with [[Links]], but I agree that there's not enough info currently. Unless more varied examples are provided, I would support del teation. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::We should go ahead and just '''merge''' it. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Trey56: thoughts

Trey56 — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:49:14 GMT

thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 19 January 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::*The fact that the [[User:Phlip/Greasemonkey\|official page for Phlip's script]] wasn't included (and it's pretty much the only thing that need be included) makes me think the creator of the page simply searched for "homestar" at http://userscripts.org/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/. Also the creator calls things "extensions" and "extensions and plug-ins" when they're really Firefox add-ons and Greasemonkey scripts, so I'm not too sure they were really concerned about doing the best of research. I don't think this page needs to exist at all (I don't think we need to report on every time someone does something Homestar Runner related on the Internet, especially in light of my points above), but I'm not sure if it should be deleted outright or redirected somewhere. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 18:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)		::*The fact that the [[User:Phlip/Greasemonkey\|official page for Phlip's script]] wasn't included (and it's pretty much the only thing that need be included) makes me think the creator of the page simply searched for "homestar" at http://userscripts.org/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/. Also the creator calls things "extensions" and "extensions and plug-ins" when they're really Firefox add-ons and Greasemonkey scripts, so I'm not too sure they were really concerned about doing the best of research. I don't think this page needs to exist at all (I don't think we need to report on every time someone does something Homestar Runner related on the Internet, especially in light of my points above), but I'm not sure if it should be deleted outright or redirected somewhere. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 18:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
	:Concurence with the <b>Merge</b>. Unwieldy, and not especially useful as a stand-alone article — [[User:Flashfight\|Flashfight]] 01:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)		:Concurence with the <b>Merge</b>. Unwieldy, and not especially useful as a stand-alone article — [[User:Flashfight\|Flashfight]] 01:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
		+	::If there were a greater variety of such extensions, I would support merging this page with [[Links]], but I agree that there's not enough info currently. Unless more varied examples are provided, I would support del teation. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 01:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Flashfight at 01:42, 19 January 2008

Flashfight — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:42:01 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:42, 19 January 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::*[http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/1015 Homestar Runner - StrongBad Emails: Prev & Next script] by unknown is also included in a different implimentation in Phlip's script.		::*[http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/1015 Homestar Runner - StrongBad Emails: Prev & Next script] by unknown is also included in a different implimentation in Phlip's script.
	::*The fact that the [[User:Phlip/Greasemonkey\|official page for Phlip's script]] wasn't included (and it's pretty much the only thing that need be included) makes me think the creator of the page simply searched for "homestar" at http://userscripts.org/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/. Also the creator calls things "extensions" and "extensions and plug-ins" when they're really Firefox add-ons and Greasemonkey scripts, so I'm not too sure they were really concerned about doing the best of research. I don't think this page needs to exist at all (I don't think we need to report on every time someone does something Homestar Runner related on the Internet, especially in light of my points above), but I'm not sure if it should be deleted outright or redirected somewhere. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 18:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)		::*The fact that the [[User:Phlip/Greasemonkey\|official page for Phlip's script]] wasn't included (and it's pretty much the only thing that need be included) makes me think the creator of the page simply searched for "homestar" at http://userscripts.org/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/. Also the creator calls things "extensions" and "extensions and plug-ins" when they're really Firefox add-ons and Greasemonkey scripts, so I'm not too sure they were really concerned about doing the best of research. I don't think this page needs to exist at all (I don't think we need to report on every time someone does something Homestar Runner related on the Internet, especially in light of my points above), but I'm not sure if it should be deleted outright or redirected somewhere. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 18:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Concurence with the <b>Merge</b>. Unwieldy, and not especially useful as a stand-alone article — [[User:Flashfight\|Flashfight]] 01:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Trey56: Talk:extentions moved to Talk:Extensions: Not sure how long this page will last, but I'll move it to the correct spelling nonetheless

Trey56 — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:40:00 GMT

Talk:extentions moved to Talk:Extensions: Not sure how long this page will last, but I'll move it to the correct spelling nonetheless

← Older revision

Revision as of 01:40, 19 January 2008

Tom: Reply for Elcool/Loafing.

Tom — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:17:49 GMT

Reply for Elcool/Loafing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 31 December 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I highly suggest, mainly because some research was put into this, not to completely delete this page, but to clean it up and merge it with [[Links]]. What do you say? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)		I highly suggest, mainly because some research was put into this, not to completely delete this page, but to clean it up and merge it with [[Links]]. What do you say? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
	:I would second that, but I heard that some of these are actually rip-offs of the real scripts. The All-in-one script (which i just deleted from that article), for example. Maybe Tom can give some feedback about this?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 12:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)		:I would second that, but I heard that some of these are actually rip-offs of the real scripts. The All-in-one script (which i just deleted from that article), for example. Maybe Tom can give some feedback about this?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 12:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::*[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1696 Full Screen Homestar Runner] is [http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/633 Homestar-Fullon by Tim Rice] converted into an add-on. I don't see any notification that the add-on is released under the GPL, nor do I see any credit given to Tim on the add-on page. When it was first created I brought this to the attention of the author in the comments but my comment was deleted and a nasty note telling me to mind my own business was the only notification my message was received.
		+	::[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2478 HR Toolbar] is a toolbar thing, lots of feature overlap with Phlip's script; I personally don't care for it, but that's me.
		+	::*The ({{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=extentions&diff=530689&oldid=530673 removed}}) [http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/5166 Homestar All-In-One] link on userscripts.org is Phlip's page there; it seems on the level as it links to [http://userscripts.org/users/2334 Phlip's profile there] and is well documented.
		+	::*Tim Rice's [http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/633 Homestar-Fullon script] is also linked. It is included in Phlip's script.
		+	::*[http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/1015 Homestar Runner - StrongBad Emails: Prev & Next script] by unknown is also included in a different implimentation in Phlip's script.
		+	::*The fact that the [[User:Phlip/Greasemonkey\|official page for Phlip's script]] wasn't included (and it's pretty much the only thing that need be included) makes me think the creator of the page simply searched for "homestar" at http://userscripts.org/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/. Also the creator calls things "extensions" and "extensions and plug-ins" when they're really Firefox add-ons and Greasemonkey scripts, so I'm not too sure they were really concerned about doing the best of research. I don't think this page needs to exist at all (I don't think we need to report on every time someone does something Homestar Runner related on the Internet, especially in light of my points above), but I'm not sure if it should be deleted outright or redirected somewhere. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 18:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Loafing: yeah,m but

Loafing — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:27:07 GMT

yeah,m but

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 26 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{ttbd}}		{{ttbd}}
	I highly suggest, mainly because some research was put into this, not to completely delete this page, but to clean it up and merge it with [[Links]]. What do you say? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)		I highly suggest, mainly because some research was put into this, not to completely delete this page, but to clean it up and merge it with [[Links]]. What do you say? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	:I would second that, but I heard that some of these are actually rip-offs of the real scripts. The All-in-one script (which i just deleted from that article), for example. Maybe Tom can give some feedback about this?{{User:Loafing/sig}} 12:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Elcool: merge with Links

Elcool — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 08:01:23 GMT

merge with Links

New page

{{ttbd}}
I highly suggest, mainly because some research was put into this, not to completely delete this page, but to clean it up and merge it with [[Links]]. What do you say? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 08:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)