Talk:Beth - Revision history

DorianGray: {{deletedtalk}}

DorianGray — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:37:54 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:37, 13 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}
	Too minor, far too minor. The instances aren't even linked in any way. It's just a name. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		Too minor, far too minor. The instances aren't even linked in any way. It's just a name. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
	:Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		:Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Johnny Jupiter: come on, people! come on, palm trees!

Johnny Jupiter — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:05:00 GMT

come on, people! come on, palm trees!

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 22 August 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	It's only a name. DELETE. --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 01:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)		It's only a name. DELETE. --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 01:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	'''Delete'''- This article makes it sound like he's talking about the same person. Which is unlikely unless Strong Bad personally knows [[Leomard Sportsinterviews]] and/or the girl who inspired that page in the book, assuming it's even a real girl, and assuming the girl he mentions in [[the process]] is a real girl, which is also unlikely.... .... .... too much. This page is ridiculous.--[[User:Antisexy\|Antisexy]] 02:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Acam30 at 01:55, 22 August 2007

Acam30 — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:55:53 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 22 August 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Not enough appearances. '''DELETE'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		:Not enough appearances. '''DELETE'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
	::Definitely a coincidence. '''Delete'''. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 14:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		::Definitely a coincidence. '''Delete'''. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 14:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	It's only a name. DELETE. --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 01:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Homestar-Winner: delete

Homestar-Winner — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:53:58 GMT

delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 21 August 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	'''Delete''': does not measure up to our inclusion guidelines: only two occurrances and not notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		'''Delete''': does not measure up to our inclusion guidelines: only two occurrances and not notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
	:Not enough appearances. '''DELETE'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)		:Not enough appearances. '''DELETE'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Definitely a coincidence. '''Delete'''. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 14:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

The Chort: delete

The Chort — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:50:00 GMT

delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 21 August 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::I have nothing against anonymous edits per se (I did that for a couple years before getting an account), but I feel that if something as major as page creation should be left to those with accounts, or at least anonymous page creations should be more closely scrutinized. Mainly it is about accountability (why was the page made? Is there a point? Does it add something to the Wiki as a whole?). A named user can be held accountable and shown what to do better than an IP address. Vandalism or even frivolous page creations (as it appears this page is) should be discouraged, and it is more likely to come from anonymous contributors. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 18:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		:::I have nothing against anonymous edits per se (I did that for a couple years before getting an account), but I feel that if something as major as page creation should be left to those with accounts, or at least anonymous page creations should be more closely scrutinized. Mainly it is about accountability (why was the page made? Is there a point? Does it add something to the Wiki as a whole?). A named user can be held accountable and shown what to do better than an IP address. Vandalism or even frivolous page creations (as it appears this page is) should be discouraged, and it is more likely to come from anonymous contributors. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 18:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
	'''Delete''': does not measure up to our inclusion guidelines: only two occurrances and not notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		'''Delete''': does not measure up to our inclusion guidelines: only two occurrances and not notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Not enough appearances. '''DELETE'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 14:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Loafing: delete

Loafing — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:56:18 GMT

delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 13 August 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Poor format can be fixed and should not be a concern, and bias against anonnies is intolerable. Please do not put down a page or an edit just because you see some numbers instead of a name, anonnies can be just as good at editing as named users can, and i don't like prejudice. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		::Poor format can be fixed and should not be a concern, and bias against anonnies is intolerable. Please do not put down a page or an edit just because you see some numbers instead of a name, anonnies can be just as good at editing as named users can, and i don't like prejudice. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
	:::I have nothing against anonymous edits per se (I did that for a couple years before getting an account), but I feel that if something as major as page creation should be left to those with accounts, or at least anonymous page creations should be more closely scrutinized. Mainly it is about accountability (why was the page made? Is there a point? Does it add something to the Wiki as a whole?). A named user can be held accountable and shown what to do better than an IP address. Vandalism or even frivolous page creations (as it appears this page is) should be discouraged, and it is more likely to come from anonymous contributors. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 18:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		:::I have nothing against anonymous edits per se (I did that for a couple years before getting an account), but I feel that if something as major as page creation should be left to those with accounts, or at least anonymous page creations should be more closely scrutinized. Mainly it is about accountability (why was the page made? Is there a point? Does it add something to the Wiki as a whole?). A named user can be held accountable and shown what to do better than an IP address. Vandalism or even frivolous page creations (as it appears this page is) should be discouraged, and it is more likely to come from anonymous contributors. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 18:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	'''Delete''': does not measure up to our inclusion guidelines: only two occurrances and not notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Wbwolf: My wiki philosophy

Wbwolf — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:30:55 GMT

My wiki philosophy

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 13 August 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		:Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
	::Poor format can be fixed and should not be a concern, and bias against anonnies is intolerable. Please do not put down a page or an edit just because you see some numbers instead of a name, anonnies can be just as good at editing as named users can, and i don't like prejudice. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		::Poor format can be fixed and should not be a concern, and bias against anonnies is intolerable. Please do not put down a page or an edit just because you see some numbers instead of a name, anonnies can be just as good at editing as named users can, and i don't like prejudice. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::I have nothing against anonymous edits per se (I did that for a couple years before getting an account), but I feel that if something as major as page creation should be left to those with accounts, or at least anonymous page creations should be more closely scrutinized. Mainly it is about accountability (why was the page made? Is there a point? Does it add something to the Wiki as a whole?). A named user can be held accountable and shown what to do better than an IP address. Vandalism or even frivolous page creations (as it appears this page is) should be discouraged, and it is more likely to come from anonymous contributors. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 18:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Defender1031: oops

Defender1031 — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:58:40 GMT

oops

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:58, 13 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Too minor, far too minor. The instances aren't even linked in any way. It's just a name. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		Too minor, far too minor. The instances aren't even linked in any way. It's just a name. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
	:Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		:Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
-	::Poor format can be fixed and should not be a concern, and bias ~~towards~~ anonnies is intolerable. Please do not put down a page or an edit just because you see some numbers instead of a name, anonnies can be just as good at editing as named users can, and i don't like prejudice. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)	+	::Poor format can be fixed and should not be a concern, and bias against anonnies is intolerable. Please do not put down a page or an edit just because you see some numbers instead of a name, anonnies can be just as good at editing as named users can, and i don't like prejudice. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Defender1031: don't go hatin the anonnies just cause they not users

Defender1031 — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:55:08 GMT

don't go hatin the anonnies just cause they not users

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:55, 13 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Too minor, far too minor. The instances aren't even linked in any way. It's just a name. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		Too minor, far too minor. The instances aren't even linked in any way. It's just a name. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
	:Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		:Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Poor format can be fixed and should not be a concern, and bias towards anonnies is intolerable. Please do not put down a page or an edit just because you see some numbers instead of a name, anonnies can be just as good at editing as named users can, and i don't like prejudice. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Wbwolf at 17:42, 13 August 2007

Wbwolf — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:42:12 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 13 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{ttbd}}		{{ttbd}}
	Too minor, far too minor. The instances aren't even linked in any way. It's just a name. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)		Too minor, far too minor. The instances aren't even linked in any way. It's just a name. '''delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 17:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Moreover, unlike [[Dan]], there are only two instances, so it falls below the notability threshold. Not to mention poor format and creation by an anony. '''delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)