Talk:Babies - Revision history

Chipwich at 01:49, 1 April 2008

Chipwich — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:49:54 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 1 April 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	::::::Agree with HL, no merge[[User:DAGRON\|DAGRON]] 21:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)		::::::Agree with HL, no merge[[User:DAGRON\|DAGRON]] 21:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::Merge with children.		:::::::Merge with children.
-		+	::::Merge!'''NOW!!!'''
	Any of those who supported keeping this page before the suggestion of the merge: would you consider commenting if you agree or disagree with the merge? I think we can safely say this article will not be deleted, but the merge decision isn't so clear yet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)		Any of those who supported keeping this page before the suggestion of the merge: would you consider commenting if you agree or disagree with the merge? I think we can safely say this article will not be deleted, but the merge decision isn't so clear yet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
	:I"m against merging with Children. If anything, that article should be discussed, not this one. The stereotypical baby (big head, wearing almost always nothing but a diaper, drooling, goo-goo-gaa-gaa speaking) is shown in many places and therefor deserves it's own page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 12:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)		:I"m against merging with Children. If anything, that article should be discussed, not this one. The stereotypical baby (big head, wearing almost always nothing but a diaper, drooling, goo-goo-gaa-gaa speaking) is shown in many places and therefor deserves it's own page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 12:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
	::As there's been no real consensus to merge, I'm removing the tags and leaving the article as is. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)		::As there's been no real consensus to merge, I'm removing the tags and leaving the article as is. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: remove tbd and comment on close

Heimstern Läufer — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:04:37 GMT

remove tbd and comment on close

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 28 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{ttbd}}~~
	==delete?==		==delete?==
	<s>[[HRWiki:spoons]] and yes it is. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)</s>		<s>[[HRWiki:spoons]] and yes it is. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)</s>
Line 24:		Line 23:
	Any of those who supported keeping this page before the suggestion of the merge: would you consider commenting if you agree or disagree with the merge? I think we can safely say this article will not be deleted, but the merge decision isn't so clear yet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)		Any of those who supported keeping this page before the suggestion of the merge: would you consider commenting if you agree or disagree with the merge? I think we can safely say this article will not be deleted, but the merge decision isn't so clear yet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
	:I"m against merging with Children. If anything, that article should be discussed, not this one. The stereotypical baby (big head, wearing almost always nothing but a diaper, drooling, goo-goo-gaa-gaa speaking) is shown in many places and therefor deserves it's own page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 12:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)		:I"m against merging with Children. If anything, that article should be discussed, not this one. The stereotypical baby (big head, wearing almost always nothing but a diaper, drooling, goo-goo-gaa-gaa speaking) is shown in many places and therefor deserves it's own page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 12:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	::As there's been no real consensus to merge, I'm removing the tags and leaving the article as is. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 23:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Elcool: /* delete? */ late, but a reply

Elcool — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:16:03 GMT

delete?: late, but a reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 28 December 2007
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Any of those who supported keeping this page before the suggestion of the merge: would you consider commenting if you agree or disagree with the merge? I think we can safely say this article will not be deleted, but the merge decision isn't so clear yet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)		Any of those who supported keeping this page before the suggestion of the merge: would you consider commenting if you agree or disagree with the merge? I think we can safely say this article will not be deleted, but the merge decision isn't so clear yet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	:I"m against merging with Children. If anything, that article should be discussed, not this one. The stereotypical baby (big head, wearing almost always nothing but a diaper, drooling, goo-goo-gaa-gaa speaking) is shown in many places and therefor deserves it's own page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 12:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /* delete? */ comment

Heimstern Läufer — Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:55:04 GMT

delete?: comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 22 December 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:::::I dunno, I think keeping it separate is better. Yes, babies are children, but the use of babies on the site is quite different from how children are used. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)		:::::I dunno, I think keeping it separate is better. Yes, babies are children, but the use of babies on the site is quite different from how children are used. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
	::::::Agree with HL, no merge[[User:DAGRON\|DAGRON]] 21:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)		::::::Agree with HL, no merge[[User:DAGRON\|DAGRON]] 21:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
-	~~::::::::~~:::::::Merge with children.	+	:::::::Merge with children.
		+
		+	Any of those who supported keeping this page before the suggestion of the merge: would you consider commenting if you agree or disagree with the merge? I think we can safely say this article will not be deleted, but the merge decision isn't so clear yet. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Awexome at 20:33, 1 December 2007

Awexome — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:33:48 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 1 December 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:::::I dunno, I think keeping it separate is better. Yes, babies are children, but the use of babies on the site is quite different from how children are used. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)		:::::I dunno, I think keeping it separate is better. Yes, babies are children, but the use of babies on the site is quite different from how children are used. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
	::::::Agree with HL, no merge[[User:DAGRON\|DAGRON]] 21:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)		::::::Agree with HL, no merge[[User:DAGRON\|DAGRON]] 21:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::::::::Merge with children.

DAGRON at 21:48, 28 November 2007

DAGRON — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:48:38 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:48, 28 November 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::::I agree — this seems like a good solution. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)		::::I agree — this seems like a good solution. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
	:::::I dunno, I think keeping it separate is better. Yes, babies are children, but the use of babies on the site is quite different from how children are used. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)		:::::I dunno, I think keeping it separate is better. Yes, babies are children, but the use of babies on the site is quite different from how children are used. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
		+	::::::Agree with HL, no merge[[User:DAGRON\|DAGRON]] 21:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /* delete? */ no merge

Heimstern Läufer — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:07:06 GMT

delete?: no merge

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 28 November 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:

	::::I agree — this seems like a good solution. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)		::::I agree — this seems like a good solution. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::::I dunno, I think keeping it separate is better. Yes, babies are children, but the use of babies on the site is quite different from how children are used. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Trey56: /* delete? */ merge

Trey56 — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 03:12:10 GMT

delete?: merge

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 28 November 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::I'm okay with '''merge''', but I also have no problem with simply keeping the page here. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)		::I'm okay with '''merge''', but I also have no problem with simply keeping the page here. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
	:::I agree with merging with [[Children]]. It's just... logical. --[[User:Jnelson09\|Jnelson09]] 22:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)		:::I agree with merging with [[Children]]. It's just... logical. --[[User:Jnelson09\|Jnelson09]] 22:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::::I agree — this seems like a good solution. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Jnelson09: /* delete? */

Jnelson09 — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:41:23 GMT

delete?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 27 November 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:Good idea. I vote '''merge''' with [[Children]]. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)		:Good idea. I vote '''merge''' with [[Children]]. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
	::I'm okay with '''merge''', but I also have no problem with simply keeping the page here. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)		::I'm okay with '''merge''', but I also have no problem with simply keeping the page here. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::I agree with merging with [[Children]]. It's just... logical. --[[User:Jnelson09\|Jnelson09]] 22:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Bluebry: /* delete? */ my take

Bluebry — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:36:52 GMT

delete?: my take

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:36, 24 November 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	OH!!! I just had an idea: MERGE CHILDREN WITH BABIES. Good idea or bad idea? [[user:haldo\|Haldo]]		OH!!! I just had an idea: MERGE CHILDREN WITH BABIES. Good idea or bad idea? [[user:haldo\|Haldo]]
	:Good idea. I vote '''merge''' with [[Children]]. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)		:Good idea. I vote '''merge''' with [[Children]]. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
		+	::I'm okay with '''merge''', but I also have no problem with simply keeping the page here. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 01:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)