Talk:Authorless Books - Revision history

Heimstern Läufer: rm tag, comment

Heimstern Läufer — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 01:34:45 GMT

rm tag, comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 2 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{tbd}}~~
	Wouldn't just [[Books]] be a more obvious page title? (At least you put all those images to good use, I was getting worried what you were up to) {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC)		Wouldn't just [[Books]] be a more obvious page title? (At least you put all those images to good use, I was getting worried what you were up to) {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Line 47:		Line 46:

	:I say we '''move the page to [[Books]]''' — books aren't really a significant topic to have separate pages for minor and major ones, at least in my, er, book. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)		:I say we '''move the page to [[Books]]''' — books aren't really a significant topic to have separate pages for minor and major ones, at least in my, er, book. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	::I've gone ahead and removed the TBD tag, as there seems to be no real interest in eliminating this article. There seems to be some interest in moving it, though I don't see a consensus for this yet. Either way, the TBD tag isn't needed anymore, methinks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Trey56: /* To be discussed... discussion */ move to Books

Trey56 — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:40:49 GMT

To be discussed... discussion: move to Books

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 31 August 2007
Line 45:		Line 45:
	:::Books ''might'' be more inclusive, I admit. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)		:::Books ''might'' be more inclusive, I admit. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
	::::First, just because there hasn't been an edit in a year is no grounds for action. If it seems to be useless, that's another thing. But is it useless? It lists the book titles found in various toons, and I think they deserve mention somehow. In a thread above, someone suggested the scope of the page was books with unknown authors, but I think that's a foolish and unnecessary distinction. Calling this Books would mean including all books found in the H*RU. Is that what we want? Alternately, we could have a Books page for major books which play into plots, such as the coloring book or the pop-up book. Then rename this to something of more relevance to what it is - theae are not necessarily "authorless", we just don't know, and again that's not really the distinction anyway. Minor Books? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 07:03, 12 August 2007 (UTC)		::::First, just because there hasn't been an edit in a year is no grounds for action. If it seems to be useless, that's another thing. But is it useless? It lists the book titles found in various toons, and I think they deserve mention somehow. In a thread above, someone suggested the scope of the page was books with unknown authors, but I think that's a foolish and unnecessary distinction. Calling this Books would mean including all books found in the H*RU. Is that what we want? Alternately, we could have a Books page for major books which play into plots, such as the coloring book or the pop-up book. Then rename this to something of more relevance to what it is - theae are not necessarily "authorless", we just don't know, and again that's not really the distinction anyway. Minor Books? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 07:03, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	:I say we '''move the page to [[Books]]''' — books aren't really a significant topic to have separate pages for minor and major ones, at least in my, er, book. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Qermaq: /* To be discussed... discussion */ thoughts

Qermaq — Sun, 12 Aug 2007 07:03:43 GMT

To be discussed... discussion: thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:03, 12 August 2007
Line 44:		Line 44:
	You mean rename the page books? Because right now if you search books it just brings you to this page. --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 03:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)		You mean rename the page books? Because right now if you search books it just brings you to this page. --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 03:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
	:::Books ''might'' be more inclusive, I admit. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)		:::Books ''might'' be more inclusive, I admit. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	::::First, just because there hasn't been an edit in a year is no grounds for action. If it seems to be useless, that's another thing. But is it useless? It lists the book titles found in various toons, and I think they deserve mention somehow. In a thread above, someone suggested the scope of the page was books with unknown authors, but I think that's a foolish and unnecessary distinction. Calling this Books would mean including all books found in the H*RU. Is that what we want? Alternately, we could have a Books page for major books which play into plots, such as the coloring book or the pop-up book. Then rename this to something of more relevance to what it is - theae are not necessarily "authorless", we just don't know, and again that's not really the distinction anyway. Minor Books? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 07:03, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

DorianGray: /* To be discussed... discussion */ Maybe

DorianGray — Sat, 04 Aug 2007 04:47:30 GMT

To be discussed... discussion: Maybe

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:47, 4 August 2007
Line 43:		Line 43:

	You mean rename the page books? Because right now if you search books it just brings you to this page. --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 03:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)		You mean rename the page books? Because right now if you search books it just brings you to this page. --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 03:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::Books ''might'' be more inclusive, I admit. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Acam30: /* To be discussed... discussion */

Acam30 — Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:26:55 GMT

To be discussed... discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:26, 4 August 2007
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:Just coz it's not added to often, it should be deleted. D= I think it's a fine page. All the books are needed to be noted somewheres. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 18:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)		:Just coz it's not added to often, it should be deleted. D= I think it's a fine page. All the books are needed to be noted somewheres. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 18:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
	::Meh, I still think we need to at least move it to [[Books]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 18:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)		::Meh, I still think we need to at least move it to [[Books]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 18:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	You mean rename the page books? Because right now if you search books it just brings you to this page. --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 03:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Bluebry: /* To be discussed... discussion */ reply

Bluebry — Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:48:11 GMT

To be discussed... discussion: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 3 August 2007
Line 40:		Line 40:
	This page hasn't had a real edit since April of aught six, and, it seems like a useless list. I think we should either A) move this to [[Books]] (which at the moment redirects to this page) where it lists all books not major enough to have their own page, or B) delete the page. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 18:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)		This page hasn't had a real edit since April of aught six, and, it seems like a useless list. I think we should either A) move this to [[Books]] (which at the moment redirects to this page) where it lists all books not major enough to have their own page, or B) delete the page. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 18:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
	:Just coz it's not added to often, it should be deleted. D= I think it's a fine page. All the books are needed to be noted somewheres. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 18:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)		:Just coz it's not added to often, it should be deleted. D= I think it's a fine page. All the books are needed to be noted somewheres. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 18:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Meh, I still think we need to at least move it to [[Books]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 18:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

DorianGray: /* To be discussed... discussion */ Reply

DorianGray — Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:46:30 GMT

To be discussed... discussion: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 3 August 2007
Line 39:		Line 39:
	==To be discussed... discussion==		==To be discussed... discussion==
	This page hasn't had a real edit since April of aught six, and, it seems like a useless list. I think we should either A) move this to [[Books]] (which at the moment redirects to this page) where it lists all books not major enough to have their own page, or B) delete the page. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 18:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)		This page hasn't had a real edit since April of aught six, and, it seems like a useless list. I think we should either A) move this to [[Books]] (which at the moment redirects to this page) where it lists all books not major enough to have their own page, or B) delete the page. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 18:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Just coz it's not added to often, it should be deleted. D= I think it's a fine page. All the books are needed to be noted somewheres. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 18:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Bluebry: tbd

Bluebry — Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:41:41 GMT

tbd

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 3 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{tbd}}
	Wouldn't just [[Books]] be a more obvious page title? (At least you put all those images to good use, I was getting worried what you were up to) {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC)		Wouldn't just [[Books]] be a more obvious page title? (At least you put all those images to good use, I was getting worried what you were up to) {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 22:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Line 35:		Line 36:

	What do you think? {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 19:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)		What do you think? {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 19:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	==To be discussed... discussion==
		+	This page hasn't had a real edit since April of aught six, and, it seems like a useless list. I think we should either A) move this to [[Books]] (which at the moment redirects to this page) where it lists all books not major enough to have their own page, or B) delete the page. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 18:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Bluebry: Yearbook?

Bluebry — Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:04:17 GMT

Yearbook?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 5 February 2006
Line 27:		Line 27:
	::But only the rampage ones. The That A Ghost ones are fine. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 02:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)		::But only the rampage ones. The That A Ghost ones are fine. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 02:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
	:::I fixed the blurry images. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 18:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)		:::I fixed the blurry images. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 18:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Yearbook? ==
		+
		+	Wait, guys, I added the Yearbook, and, now that I think about it, it isn't minor, which is one of the things required.
		+
		+	Taken from page: ''This is a list of all '''''minor''''' books that have titles, but do not have authors.''
		+
		+	What do you think? {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 19:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Bluebry: /* Tiny Titles */

Bluebry — Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:59:34 GMT

Tiny Titles

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 5 February 2006
Line 26:		Line 26:
	:Perhaps if you zoomed in on the Flash file before taking a screen shot... --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]		:Perhaps if you zoomed in on the Flash file before taking a screen shot... --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]
	::But only the rampage ones. The That A Ghost ones are fine. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 02:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)		::But only the rampage ones. The That A Ghost ones are fine. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 02:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
		+	:::I fixed the blurry images. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 18:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)