HRWiki talk:Users - Revision history

MichaelXX2: rv/v

MichaelXX2 — Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:03:42 GMT

rv/v

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:03, 12 March 2011
Line 1:	Line 1:
-	+	== Needed? ==
	+	I don't see the need to fix ''every'' red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for [[HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users]]. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think [[Special:ListGroupRights]] would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say delete both. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	+	:The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	+	::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	+	:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	+	::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]], or insert a redirect.) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
	+	:::::Fixing them whatever way is best is fine by me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 13:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
	+	I Think This Page should stay

Hom0wngige: blanked the page

Hom0wngige — Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:32:58 GMT

blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 12 March 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~== Needed? ==~~	+
-	I don't see the need to fix ''every'' red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for [[HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users]]. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think [[Special:ListGroupRights]] would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say delete both. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)	+
-	:The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)	+
-	~~::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)~~	+
-	:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)	+
-	::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]], or insert a redirect.) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)	+
-	~~:::::Fixing them whatever way is best is fine by me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 13:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~I Think This Page should stay~~	+

Hom0wngige: /* Needed? */

Hom0wngige — Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:55:47 GMT

Needed?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:55, 9 March 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]], or insert a redirect.) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)		::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]], or insert a redirect.) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
	:::::Fixing them whatever way is best is fine by me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 13:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)		:::::Fixing them whatever way is best is fine by me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 13:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
		+	I Think This Page should stay

It's dot com: parallel verbs

It's dot com — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:14:27 GMT

parallel verbs

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:14, 27 January 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
-	::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]], or ~~using~~ a redirect.) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)	+	::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]], or insert a redirect.) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
	:::::Fixing them whatever way is best is fine by me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 13:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)		:::::Fixing them whatever way is best is fine by me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 13:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: also a fine solution

Heimstern Läufer — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:27:17 GMT

also a fine solution

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:27, 27 January 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]], or using a redirect.) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)		::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]], or using a redirect.) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
		+	:::::Fixing them whatever way is best is fine by me. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 13:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

It's dot com: also

It's dot com — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:21:34 GMT

also

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 27 January 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
-	::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]].) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)	+	::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]], or using a redirect.) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

It's dot com: yes, we should eliminate red links, but not necessarily by making pages

It's dot com — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:21:01 GMT

yes, we should eliminate red links, but not necessarily by making pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 27 January 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
		+	::::Yes, we should eliminate red links on official pages. (Note that this doesn't always mean making a page. Sometimes we can just remove the link, [[MediaWiki:Listgrouprights-summary\|as I did in this case]].) Red links are unsightly and on the unprofessional side. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Soiled Bargains: Whoops. Apparently I wandered around in the wikitext and modified Heim's post. Fix'd!

Soiled Bargains — Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:27:36 GMT

Whoops. Apparently I wandered around in the wikitext and modified Heim's post. Fix'd!

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 26 January 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I don't see the need to fix ''every'' red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for [[HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users]]. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think [[Special:ListGroupRights]] would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say delete both. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		I don't see the need to fix ''every'' red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for [[HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users]]. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think [[Special:ListGroupRights]] would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say delete both. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	:The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		:The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
-	::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on ~~tho since it's linked to from se~~ grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)	+	::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Soiled Bargains: /* Needed? */ Reply: Keep both; don't continue fixing red links in the interface.

Soiled Bargains — Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:24:58 GMT

Needed?: Reply: Keep both; don't continue fixing red links in the interface.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 26 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Needed? ==		== Needed? ==
-	I don't see the need to fix ''every'' red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for [[HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users]]. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think [[Special:ListGroupRights]] would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say ~~'''~~delete both~~'''~~. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)	+	I don't see the need to fix ''every'' red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for [[HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users]]. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think [[Special:ListGroupRights]] would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say delete both. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	:The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		:The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
-	::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on ~~those~~ grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)	+	::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on tho since it's linked to from se grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
		+	:::So you think that we should create [[Help:Group rights]], just because there's another red link in [[Special:ListGroupRights]]? I don't see the point of that. I agree with Dot com, since they're already created, there's no point in deleting them. Deleting these pages and creating new ones to fill holes in the interface would only further add what I would consider to be unneeded entries in the database. '''Keep both; don't continue to fix red links in the interface.''' {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 23:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /* Needed? */ red links = ugly

Heimstern Läufer — Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:10:47 GMT

Needed?: red links = ugly

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 26 January 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I don't see the need to fix ''every'' red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for [[HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users]]. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think [[Special:ListGroupRights]] would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say '''delete both'''. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		I don't see the need to fix ''every'' red link in our interface just 'cause. Why do we need this? Doesn't the name of the group speak for itself? Same thing for [[HRWiki:Autoconfirmed users]]. Sure, that page could be used to answer the age old question of "Why can't I x yet?" But, if a standard, short explanation would even require a link, I think [[Special:ListGroupRights]] would easily suffice instead. Unless someone is able to give these pages a better purpose besides filling a void, I say '''delete both'''. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 00:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC), last edited 01:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
	:The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)		:The red links probably weren't hurting, but now that the pages have been created, I see no reason to delete them. Filling them with basic content and maybe a link is probably better than nothing. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
		+	::I think red links in the interface are pretty ugly, and on those grounds alone say '''keep'''. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 11:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)