HRWiki talk:STUFF - Revision history

It's dot com: /* How Did I Get Here? */ this redirect doesn't work anymore

It's dot com — Fri, 25 Aug 2017 03:51:58 GMT

How Did I Get Here?: this redirect doesn't work anymore

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:51, 25 August 2017
Line 77:		Line 77:
	* [[The Stick]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:09, 6 Jul 2005 (UTC)		* [[The Stick]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 00:09, 6 Jul 2005 (UTC)
	** Not bad, not bad. Clicking two links vs. typing one search. I'll have to decide. Thanks, Jay. [[User:single deuce\|single deuce]] 00:51, 6 Jul 2005 (UTC)		** Not bad, not bad. Clicking two links vs. typing one search. I'll have to decide. Thanks, Jay. [[User:single deuce\|single deuce]] 00:51, 6 Jul 2005 (UTC)
-	***Plus, [[STUFF]] redirects here. That's only five letters! - {{User:Kookykman/sig}}	+	***Plus, [[HRWiki:STUFF\|STUFF]] redirects here ''[update: not anymore]''. That's only five letters! - {{User:Kookykman/sig}}
-	****Incidentally, so does [[stuff]]. That doesn't even require ''shift''. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]]	+	****Incidentally, so does [[HRWiki:STUFF\|stuff]] ''[update: not anymore]''. That doesn't even require ''shift''. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]]

	== Fake User Names or Unlogged Regulars? ==		== Fake User Names or Unlogged Regulars? ==

Guard Duck: /* Protest */

Guard Duck — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:58:35 GMT

Protest

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:58, 20 February 2009
Line 501:		Line 501:

	BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! I LIKE VOTING! --[[User:Fangoriously\|Fangoriously]] 22:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)		BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! I LIKE VOTING! --[[User:Fangoriously\|Fangoriously]] 22:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
		+	:STUFF was decommissioned for a good reason, and if you want to read the discussion leading to its closure, you can go [[HRwiki talk:STUFF#Decommission\|here]]. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 22:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Fangoriously: /**/Protest

Fangoriously — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:23:28 GMT

: Protest

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 20 February 2009
Line 497:		Line 497:
	Since STUFF has been gone now for a few months, should we remove the links to this page, or at least the ones that talk about the STUFF process like [[HRWiki:Standards#Fun_Facts\|here]] and [[Help:Contents#Specific_Help\|here]]? We don't want new users to be misguided, but we also don't want them to not have a way to know what STUFF was when they look at an older toon's talk page, so I'm not sure whether or not to be bold here. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 18:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)		Since STUFF has been gone now for a few months, should we remove the links to this page, or at least the ones that talk about the STUFF process like [[HRWiki:Standards#Fun_Facts\|here]] and [[Help:Contents#Specific_Help\|here]]? We don't want new users to be misguided, but we also don't want them to not have a way to know what STUFF was when they look at an older toon's talk page, so I'm not sure whether or not to be bold here. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 18:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
	:Right, we don't want it to appear as though it's still active. I've removed the direct links in the spots you mention (while keeping the one that points to the [[HRWiki:STUFF/About\|advice]]). — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)		:Right, we don't want it to appear as though it's still active. I've removed the direct links in the spots you mention (while keeping the one that points to the [[HRWiki:STUFF/About\|advice]]). — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Protest ==
		+
		+	BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! BRING BACK STUFF! I LIKE VOTING! --[[User:Fangoriously\|Fangoriously]] 22:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

It's dot com: /* Removing Links */ reply for Brightstar

It's dot com — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:53:19 GMT

Removing Links: reply for Brightstar

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 12 November 2008
Line 496:		Line 496:

	Since STUFF has been gone now for a few months, should we remove the links to this page, or at least the ones that talk about the STUFF process like [[HRWiki:Standards#Fun_Facts\|here]] and [[Help:Contents#Specific_Help\|here]]? We don't want new users to be misguided, but we also don't want them to not have a way to know what STUFF was when they look at an older toon's talk page, so I'm not sure whether or not to be bold here. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 18:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)		Since STUFF has been gone now for a few months, should we remove the links to this page, or at least the ones that talk about the STUFF process like [[HRWiki:Standards#Fun_Facts\|here]] and [[Help:Contents#Specific_Help\|here]]? We don't want new users to be misguided, but we also don't want them to not have a way to know what STUFF was when they look at an older toon's talk page, so I'm not sure whether or not to be bold here. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 18:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
		+	:Right, we don't want it to appear as though it's still active. I've removed the direct links in the spots you mention (while keeping the one that points to the [[HRWiki:STUFF/About\|advice]]). — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Brightstar Shiner: /**/Removing Links

Brightstar Shiner — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:31:05 GMT

: Removing Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 20 October 2008
Line 492:		Line 492:
	::I'm not saying they go completely unnoticed, just that very few people participate (at least for those discussions farther down the page). In STUFF, generally a lot of people participate, which I think gives us a better and more accurate consensus. Anyway, that whole "80%" thing was just an opinion based on my observations. I'm not going to claim that it's a proven fact. That's just what I think and how it appears to me. {{User:That Guy Over There/sig}} 02:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::I'm not saying they go completely unnoticed, just that very few people participate (at least for those discussions farther down the page). In STUFF, generally a lot of people participate, which I think gives us a better and more accurate consensus. Anyway, that whole "80%" thing was just an opinion based on my observations. I'm not going to claim that it's a proven fact. That's just what I think and how it appears to me. {{User:That Guy Over There/sig}} 02:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
	Based on the discussion, I have now officially decommissioned STUFF. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 21:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)		Based on the discussion, I have now officially decommissioned STUFF. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 21:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Removing Links ==
		+
		+	Since STUFF has been gone now for a few months, should we remove the links to this page, or at least the ones that talk about the STUFF process like [[HRWiki:Standards#Fun_Facts\|here]] and [[Help:Contents#Specific_Help\|here]]? We don't want new users to be misguided, but we also don't want them to not have a way to know what STUFF was when they look at an older toon's talk page, so I'm not sure whether or not to be bold here. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 18:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

It's dot com: /* Decommission */ done and done

It's dot com — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:29:28 GMT

Decommission: done and done

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 12 August 2008
Line 491:		Line 491:
	::<small>How did I not know this was going on for months? I hate being gone...</small> I agree with decommissioning STUFF. I don't know how much Open Discussions is being used, but hopefully it can fill STUFF's remaining niche smoothly and without mass chaos. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 19:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		::<small>How did I not know this was going on for months? I hate being gone...</small> I agree with decommissioning STUFF. I don't know how much Open Discussions is being used, but hopefully it can fill STUFF's remaining niche smoothly and without mass chaos. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 19:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
	::I'm not saying they go completely unnoticed, just that very few people participate (at least for those discussions farther down the page). In STUFF, generally a lot of people participate, which I think gives us a better and more accurate consensus. Anyway, that whole "80%" thing was just an opinion based on my observations. I'm not going to claim that it's a proven fact. That's just what I think and how it appears to me. {{User:That Guy Over There/sig}} 02:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::I'm not saying they go completely unnoticed, just that very few people participate (at least for those discussions farther down the page). In STUFF, generally a lot of people participate, which I think gives us a better and more accurate consensus. Anyway, that whole "80%" thing was just an opinion based on my observations. I'm not going to claim that it's a proven fact. That's just what I think and how it appears to me. {{User:That Guy Over There/sig}} 02:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+	Based on the discussion, I have now officially decommissioned STUFF. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 21:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: this doesn't belong here

Defender1031 — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 06:07:29 GMT

this doesn't belong here

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:07, 7 August 2008
Line 491:		Line 491:
	::<small>How did I not know this was going on for months? I hate being gone...</small> I agree with decommissioning STUFF. I don't know how much Open Discussions is being used, but hopefully it can fill STUFF's remaining niche smoothly and without mass chaos. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 19:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		::<small>How did I not know this was going on for months? I hate being gone...</small> I agree with decommissioning STUFF. I don't know how much Open Discussions is being used, but hopefully it can fill STUFF's remaining niche smoothly and without mass chaos. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 19:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
	::I'm not saying they go completely unnoticed, just that very few people participate (at least for those discussions farther down the page). In STUFF, generally a lot of people participate, which I think gives us a better and more accurate consensus. Anyway, that whole "80%" thing was just an opinion based on my observations. I'm not going to claim that it's a proven fact. That's just what I think and how it appears to me. {{User:That Guy Over There/sig}} 02:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::I'm not saying they go completely unnoticed, just that very few people participate (at least for those discussions farther down the page). In STUFF, generally a lot of people participate, which I think gives us a better and more accurate consensus. Anyway, that whole "80%" thing was just an opinion based on my observations. I'm not going to claim that it's a proven fact. That's just what I think and how it appears to me. {{User:That Guy Over There/sig}} 02:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
-
-	~~== Perhaps someone can help me ==~~
-
-	~~What is going on? Why doesn't the Homestar Runner Wiki Forum work? I don't understand. Thank you for your time and happy belated Trogday!~~
-	~~:Please read [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/Talk:Main_Page#Read-Only_Forum this] for more information. {{User:DevonM/sig}} 05:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)~~

DevonM: /* Perhaps someone can help me */

DevonM — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:59:44 GMT

Perhaps someone can help me

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:59, 7 August 2008
Line 495:		Line 495:

	What is going on? Why doesn't the Homestar Runner Wiki Forum work? I don't understand. Thank you for your time and happy belated Trogday!		What is going on? Why doesn't the Homestar Runner Wiki Forum work? I don't understand. Thank you for your time and happy belated Trogday!
		+	:Please read [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/Talk:Main_Page#Read-Only_Forum this] for more information. {{User:DevonM/sig}} 05:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

98.111.114.133: /**/Perhaps someone can help me

98.111.114.133 — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:55:51 GMT

: Perhaps someone can help me

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:55, 7 August 2008
Line 491:		Line 491:
	::<small>How did I not know this was going on for months? I hate being gone...</small> I agree with decommissioning STUFF. I don't know how much Open Discussions is being used, but hopefully it can fill STUFF's remaining niche smoothly and without mass chaos. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 19:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		::<small>How did I not know this was going on for months? I hate being gone...</small> I agree with decommissioning STUFF. I don't know how much Open Discussions is being used, but hopefully it can fill STUFF's remaining niche smoothly and without mass chaos. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 19:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
	::I'm not saying they go completely unnoticed, just that very few people participate (at least for those discussions farther down the page). In STUFF, generally a lot of people participate, which I think gives us a better and more accurate consensus. Anyway, that whole "80%" thing was just an opinion based on my observations. I'm not going to claim that it's a proven fact. That's just what I think and how it appears to me. {{User:That Guy Over There/sig}} 02:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::I'm not saying they go completely unnoticed, just that very few people participate (at least for those discussions farther down the page). In STUFF, generally a lot of people participate, which I think gives us a better and more accurate consensus. Anyway, that whole "80%" thing was just an opinion based on my observations. I'm not going to claim that it's a proven fact. That's just what I think and how it appears to me. {{User:That Guy Over There/sig}} 02:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Perhaps someone can help me ==
		+
		+	What is going on? Why doesn't the Homestar Runner Wiki Forum work? I don't understand. Thank you for your time and happy belated Trogday!

Heimstern Läufer: Reverted edits by 98.111.114.133 (Talk); changed back to last version by That Guy Over There

Heimstern Läufer — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:53:56 GMT

Reverted edits by 98.111.114.133 (Talk); changed back to last version by That Guy Over There

Show changes